People

10° London Hi 14°C / Lo 8°C

Revealed: the woman who terrified the British Empire

A new biography explains how Jind Kaur, last queen of the Punjab, died in Victorian London

By Jerome Taylor

Maharani Jind Kaur, the beauty who fought the empire and reminded her son  Maharajah Duleep Singh of his heritage

Maharani Jind Kaur, the beauty who fought the empire and reminded her son Maharajah Duleep Singh of his heritage

On 1 August 1863, shortly after 6:15 in the evening, a frail and partially-blind queen who had spent much of her life raging against the British Empire, died in her bed on the top floor of a Kensington townhouse.

It was a peculiar and remarkably quiet end for a woman once the scourge of the British Raj in India. Only 15 years earlier, Jind Kaur, the Maharani of the Punjab, had encouraged the Sikh Empire to wage two disastrous wars against the British which led to the annexation of the Punjab and Jind being torn from her son when he was just nine-years-old.

Adopted by a dour colonial surgeon, that son, Duleep Singh, swiftly shed his Punjabi customs, converted to Christianity and moved to England to live the life of a respectable country squire, shooting grouse on his estate and hosting decadent parties for Britain's Victorian elite.

The "Black Prince", as he was known in London, became firm friends with Queen Victoria, only to fall from grace after he was caught trying to persuade Russia to invade India and return his kingdom to him. His tale has been well documented.

But for the first time his mother's remarkable life has been uncovered by a British historian, Peter Bance, who publishes his findings this week in the book Maharajah Duleep Singh – Sovereign, Squire And Rebel.

While researching a tome on the Duleep Singh family, which lived in exile on a sprawling country estate near Thetford, Norfolk, Mr Bance stumbled upon the gravestone of Jind Kaur in the catacombs of the Kensal Green Dissenters' Chapel. Historians had assumed that the Maharani's cremation occurred in India but here was a simple white marble tombstone in London with her name on it.

As cremation was illegal in Britain at the time it appears that the Maharani's remains were kept in the chapel for nearly a year while Duleep arranged for her to be taken home. The astonishing relic of a person who made no secret of her dislike for the country where she eventually died lay hidden for more than a century.

Mr Bance has dug into who Jind Kaur really was, why she ended up dying in the capital of a country that was once her sworn enemy and how, as her life slipped away in a cold London townhouse, she reawakened her son's royal heritage and inspired him to take back his lost kingdom.

"It's an amazing find because Jind Kaur was only buried in Britain for little over year and yet someone went to the trouble of creating this very ornate gravestone for her," says Mr Bance. "The inscription is partly in English and partly in the Sikh Gurmukhi script and what makes it unusual is that very few people in Britain at the time would have been able to translate Gurmukhi, let alone carve it into marble. She is the first documented Sikh woman in Britain."

To say that Jind Kaur was a thorn in the side of the East India Company would be an understatement. She was born into humble origins, the daughter of the Royal Kennel Keeper at the Sikh court in Lahore, but she was ravishingly beautiful and soon caught the attention of the Punjab's greatest ruler, the one-eyed Ranjit Singh.

Having kept the British at bay for decades, Ranjit's empire began to crumble with his death in 1839. Following a series of bloody succession battles, Jind emerged as regent for Duleep who was less than a year old when his father died.

Concerned about the instability (and attracted to the kingdom's fabulous wealth) Britain began preparing to take the Punjab, goading the Sikh armies into two wars that eventually led to the disappearance of an indigenous Asian empire that stretched from the Khyber Pass to Kashmir.

Jind was instrumental in organising the Sikh resistance, rallying her generals to return to battle and plotting rebellion once the British finally took over the Punjab in 1849.

To halt her influence on the young Duleep, the Punjab's new colonial masters dragged the Queen away from her son and imprisoned her. The British press began a smear campaign against the Maharani, labelling her the "Messalina of the Punjab", portraying her as a licentious seductress who was too rebellious to control.

In a final act of defiance Jind Kaur escaped her jailers dressed as a slave girl and trekked 800 miles to Nepal where she was given begrudging asylum and a place in Sikh folklore as a national hero.

She was only allowed to see her son 13 years later when he returned to Kolkata for a tiger-hunting trip. Duleep asked to bring his mother from Kolkata to England. The British Government decided the last Queen of the Punjab no longer posed a threat and gave him permission.

But a number of historians now believe it was Jind Kaur's brief reunion with her son in the country she despised that rekindled Duleep's desire to take back his kingdom.

"In a way she had the last laugh," says Harbinder Singh, director of the Anglo-Sikh Heritage Trail. "When you look at the life of Duleep Singh the moment where he began to turn his back on Britain and rebel was immediately after meeting his mother. The British assumed that this frail looking woman, who was nearly blind and had lost her looks, was no longer a force to be reckoned with. But she reminded her son of who he was and where his kingdom really lay."

In the end, Duleep's attempts to persuade the Tsar of Russia to invade India backfired spectacularly because British spies had followed his every move. Publicly humiliated, Duleep lived his final years in a Paris hotel room desperately seeking the forgiveness of Victoria.

"The whole family's story is desperately tragic," says Mr Bance. "None of Duleep's children gave birth to an heir and his lineage died out within a generation. But what gives me some comfort is the idea that, just before she died, this frail but formidable woman made him remember who he was."

Ousted emperors: Deposed by the British

*Mukarram Jah The final Nizam of Hyderabad lives in Turkey. After his kingdom was subsumed by India in 1948, Jah went to the Australian outback. In 1949 he was said to be the world's richest man but much of his wealth was lost in bad business deals.

*Bahadur Shah Zafar The Last Mughal Emperor was exiled to Burma after he supported the sepoys during the Indian Rebellion of 1857. Three lineages of descendents survive today.

*Tippu Sultan Called the Tiger of Mysore, his armies fought the British in south India until his death in 1799. His family was exiled to Kolkata.

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

Jind Kaur, last queen of the Punjab
[info]sweetbriar12 wrote:
Monday, 25 May 2009 at 12:58 am (UTC)
Justice has been well and truly visited upon the British Empire with its current financial woes. The British Empire upon which the sun never set, was nothing more than a big dream run by fanatical idolisers of a false God - i.e king or queen sitting on the throne in London.
There were no men with sound financial skills to reap the rewards to give the greater population of the UK anything of the vast riches exploited from the nations the Empire vanquished.

[info]fakhry wrote:
Monday, 25 May 2009 at 08:24 am (UTC)
nothing stay on the top,justice will keep the empire longer.
Jind Kaur, last queen of the Punjab
[info]lovegb5 wrote:
Monday, 25 May 2009 at 09:14 am (UTC)
Truly magnificent lady...signifies the Never say die spirit of Punjabis. There should be more research on the subject .
Re: Jind Kaur, last queen of the Punjab
[info]badalandabad wrote:
Monday, 25 May 2009 at 08:14 pm (UTC)
Why don't you do it? You seem to be interested very much.
How strange
[info]larkspur_14 wrote:
Monday, 25 May 2009 at 10:36 am (UTC)
that we should remember as "heroic" someone who inspired so many futile and disastrous conflicts, and who must have been responsible for the deaths of thousands. This gives comfort? Only to the delusionally nationalistic and violent. India has far better heroes and teachers.
jind kaur
[info]staar_39 wrote:
Monday, 25 May 2009 at 11:20 am (UTC)
the heroes you are referring to might they be the bollywood actors or the other 5% of population that are super rich while everybody else who has just enough money to live or the slum residents who have nothing please tell what heroes are you talking about
Futile?
[info]smileycyulture wrote:
Monday, 25 May 2009 at 11:25 am (UTC)
In response to the earlier comment.. in remembering this woman it highlights the sheer duplicitous nature of the British Empire and how they , with their goading of the Sikh armies in an attempt to take Punjab for their riches caused the unnessacery deaths of thousands of innocents. India has far better teachers , but this womans sheer nerve to stand up for her people and reawaken her sons realisation of her sons heritage was indeed something that should be remembered also.
Descendents of Bahadur Shah Zafar
[info]kt001 wrote:
Monday, 25 May 2009 at 11:36 am (UTC)
At the end of the article on Maharani Jind Kaur, it is mentioned that there are 3 lineages of the Last Mughal Emperor. Who are they (as I am a genunine and recognized descendent and there are many more)?

Regards
Mirza Khurrum Bakht Taimuri Gurgani
Re: Descendents of Bahadur Shah Zafar
[info]jerome_taylor wrote:
Monday, 25 May 2009 at 03:04 pm (UTC)
Mirza,

My understanding is that their are three family lines, largely based in Kolkata, Hyderabad and Delhi.

They include the line of Jalaluddin Mirza in Bengal, who served at the court of the Maharaja of Dighapatia, and the Toluqari family.

I wasn't saying there are only three direct descendants left. If I'm wrong am more than happy to correct.

J
Jind Kaur
[info]colistro wrote:
Monday, 25 May 2009 at 11:43 am (UTC)

When I read this article, I thought, aren't English people ashamed of how they intruded into these cultures? The article tends to show she was a rebel, when she really had much more rights to be there than the English. I'm Uruguayan.
Re: Jind Kaur
[info]zahradelaplata wrote:
Monday, 25 May 2009 at 01:37 pm (UTC)
No, as any member of any Empire, no Briton, past or present realize that they didn't have the right to intrude in other people's culture. See what the Spaniards did with our own Native cultures. They thought, and still think, that other people who don't share their world view, are savages, and it's their God given right (or Reason-given right) to civilize us. Whether we like it or not. If the carrots doesn't do the trick, they can always use the stick, you know. Because after all, they know better, and they do it for our own good (and to line their pockets with our wealth or natural resources). They should beg on their knees for what they did, and still do. But they will never accept their crimes. I'm Argentine, btw.
Re: Jind Kaur
[info]ancientoneuk wrote:
Monday, 25 May 2009 at 02:03 pm (UTC)
And its the same justification over the years, there is little difference in goals of the British then and the Americans now, the British were intent on converting India and other lands to Christianity whilst stealing their resources, the Americans use the god called "democracy" as their banner whilst stealing their resources.

What woke Britain up to itself was the Indian Mutiny of 1849 and laid the foundation stones for reform in the colonies, it was also unusual that Victoria intervened on the Indians behalf and demanded that British soldiers committing atrocity should be punished, it did enable the British to start to see Indians and other colonists as more than just "savages".

Regardless of whether the British were right or wrong in those days and I do think that there was a modicum of philanthropy there not driven by greed or crusading tendencies especially in the later 19th century, the British were nation builders, more so than even the Romans and it was probably the whole reason for the British success in that colonial nations did possibly come out of the British empire in a lot better state than other imperial colonies.

The American's should have looked at imperial histories and realised that empires are always doomed to fall, a static empire collapses quickly whereas a growing empire collapses on itself over time, the only empire that really broke this rule is the British one, other imperial anomalies are that Britain survived intact empire and that Britain also laid down its empire peacefully without breaking up in insurrection
Re: Jind Kaur
[info]virginia_1976 wrote:
Monday, 25 May 2009 at 07:02 pm (UTC)
America had a good teacher. Look at yourselves. Now look at all the problems inherent in India, Pakistan (the partition, anyone), Sri Lanka and the Middle East as a whole and ask yourselves what part Britain had in that? A whole lot.

Before you start pointing a finger at the so-called American 'empire', take the mote out of your own eye and look at the damage the British Empire did, world-wide. There are countries whose very actions today harken back to mischief and deeply inherent prejudices propagated by you lot.

You're not so clean.
Re: Jind Kaur
[info]irishinrussia wrote:
Monday, 25 May 2009 at 09:23 pm (UTC)
damn right, the British didn't lay down its empire peacefully, India or any other country. My God, you really believe Britain laid down its empire peacefully? Zimbabwe, Suez, Ireland, India (does Amritsar mean anything to you?), the exit from the Middle East, the Mau Mau, the USA, Burma so on and on. The empire was created by blood and steel and kept the same way until its demise. Also your Empire did fall, even if Britain didn't - Russia and Turkey both survived the collapse of their empires. The one empire which bucks the trends you point to with some reason and thought, is China. As for the idea that states came out of the Empire better than they did from most empires, it is certainly true if you are reffering to the "white" colonies. The rest of us had to fight the British out before turning on ourselves, often because of some beautiful little time bomb the British left behind see Ireland, Cyprus, Israel, India/Pakistan, and I'm sure many more.
The French, with just as much justification. claim pretty much the same things, and perhaps with more justification as there has generally been less internal strife in former French colonies. That is no excuse for the savagery with which the colonies were taken and maintained (this is a personal point now not an attack on what you said ancien- I know you didn't claim the Empire was a peaceful institution).
Lakshmibai, The Rani of Jhansi, the queen of the Maratha-ruled
[info]famulla wrote:
Monday, 25 May 2009 at 11:44 am (UTC)
Jind Kaur, the Maharani of the Punjab, had encouraged the Sikh Empire to wage two disastrous wars against the British which led to the annexation of the Punjab and Jind being torn from her son when he was just nine-years-old.
Revealed: the woman who terrified the British Empire
I beg of the harmless all the state was my mind function in one wave length. Who is then this lady?
A new biography explains how Jind Kaur, last queen of the Punjab, died in Victorian London
By Jerome Taylor Lakshmi Bai, The Rani of Jhansi (c. 1828 ? 17 June 1858) (Hindi-Marathi- the queen of the Maratha-ruled princely state of Jhansi in North India, was one of the leading figures of the Indian Rebellion of 1857, and a symbol of resistance to British rule in India. She has gone down in history as a legendary figure, as India's "Joan of Arc."[1]
Rani died on 18 June, during the battle for Gwalior. She donned warrior's clothes and rode into battle to save Gwalior Fort, about 120 miles west of Lucknow in what is now the state of Madhya Pradesh.

Rani Lakshmibai - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Early life|
Annexation|
Death|
Influence
Lakshmibai, The Rani of Jhansi, the queen of the Maratha-ruled princely state of Jhansi in North India, was one of the leading figures of the Indian Rebellion of 1857, and a symbol of resistance to British rule in India.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rani_Lakshmibai - 63k - Cached
I swear she came to me. I plead innocence on all the counts. I know nothing about her after you found this out.
I thank you
Firozali A. Mulla
Re: Lakshmibai, The Rani of Jhansi, the queen of the Maratha-ruled
[info]badalandabad wrote:
Monday, 25 May 2009 at 08:17 pm (UTC)
?
Re: Lakshmibai, The Rani of Jhansi, the queen of the Maratha-ruled
[info]famulla wrote:
Monday, 25 May 2009 at 09:07 pm (UTC)
?????en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rani_Lakshmibai - 63k - Cached
Read that budyy or doll
Empire? What Empire?
[info]neil639 wrote:
Monday, 25 May 2009 at 12:03 pm (UTC)
The British Empire came into being because we had the maxim gun and they did not. It was held together by a strange mix of military bluff, a bluff which was raely called, and vicious racial bigotry. Both these factors were well and truly exposed for what they were on 15 February 1942 when "despised" Asiatics, the Japanese, easily outfought the British garrison at Singapore and forced it into ignominious surrender. After 1945 all other European colonial powers knew the "colonial game" was up and they concentrated their efforts on making life better for their own people. Britain, on the other hand, has still not come to terms with its loss of Empire and its "second rate" status in the world - the invasions of Iraq and Afghanistan are proof of this. We still hear British politicians and military people talking about the killing and maiming of the people of these countries by British troops as being for the good of the inhabitants of these countries and of the British soldiers who invaded and occupied them as "peacekeepers" who are working for local people. What utter nonsense. Jind Kaur was a brave lady - if she and her people had been as well armed as the British Army the story of what became The Raj would in all probability have been very, very different.
[info]zahradelaplata wrote:
Monday, 25 May 2009 at 01:31 pm (UTC)
[quote]that we should remember as "heroic" someone who inspired so many futile and disastrous conflicts, and who must have been responsible for the deaths of thousands. This gives comfort? Only to the delusionally nationalistic and violent. India has far better heroes and teachers.[/quote]

And so, people has to roll over and lick the hand of the Imperial master? That's what you are saying? Dude, you are delusional. If we were to follow that rationale, we should then say that the Englishmen who resisted the German Blitzkrieg over England shouldn't be regarded as heroic either. Or is it that the difference resides in that the Englishmen finally won the war, and the Punjabi didn't? The nature of people is in defending one's land. The fact that an invader had occupied didn't mean that opposition should stop. This is something that many Empires had to learn the hard way. See what happened to the US in Vietnam. Or the British, Portuguese and the Spaniards in America.
Only an idiot would think that keeping the national pride and the national right to exist is not worth of praise.
1230 BC now we look and weep that
[info]famulla wrote:
Monday, 25 May 2009 at 02:00 pm (UTC)
1230 BC now we look and weep that
I thank you
Firozali A. Mulla
Rational man?
[info]kodak321 wrote:
Monday, 25 May 2009 at 05:11 pm (UTC)
zahr. So you're voting BNP on June 4th??
Jind Kaur or Rani of Jhansi
[info]sikhsthetruth wrote:
Monday, 25 May 2009 at 05:29 pm (UTC)
Just a note to an earlier comment, although the Rani of Jhansi was indeed a brave lady who led a rebeilion during the mutiny of 1857, she was a never not an independent ruler of a State/country like Rani Jind Kaur. Rani of Jhansi belonged to a British protected State of Jhansi, as the previous rulers of Jhansi had became under the protection of the Empire. She bearly tried to free her territory along with other rebellions in India in 1857. Whereas Jind Kaur was an Indpendenr ruler of a independent country which the British wanted to take over and annex to India.
Jind Kaur
[info]pname wrote:
Monday, 25 May 2009 at 08:47 pm (UTC)
Amazing never knew she was in London at all... well the britsh soon found out the power and courage of the Sikhs as they recurited many in the army. Sill dont understand why maraja Ranjit Singhs chair is here though.. he ruled Punjab!
Now that she is dead, has she asked you for flowers
[info]famulla wrote:
Monday, 25 May 2009 at 09:41 pm (UTC)
Regards
Mirza Khurrum Bakht Taimuri Gurgani
You are welcome
sikhsthetruth wrote: Have you heard or read. She was smuggled and buried in UK
zahradelaplata wrote: You are right all the way. What were you saying?
zahradelaplata wrote :Only an idiot would think that keeping the national pride and the national right to exist is not worth of praise. I guess the English coming back in boxes from Iraq are better??
The British Empire came into being because we had the maxim gun and they did not. It was held together by a strange mix of military bluff, a bluff which was rarely called, and vicious racial bigotry
virginia_1976 wrote: At that time, Virgin Cola or Air did not exist.
ancientoneuk wrote No not Tomahawks it was the sickness of missing home India, Bharat if you want to call:
The American's should have looked at imperial histories and realised that empires are always doomed to fall; WE are not talking of 2008/2009 are we?
They did not know of the credit crunch we have now.
Now that she is dead, has she asked you for flowers like Lady Di? We visit the place and put dozens of roses to say how we love you. If you love the rani or the Maggie who is still alive. We read a lot about her. She is good.
This piece is a waste of space, literally.
As is this one. Both are crazy but it worth reading and laugh in the dismal times. Do you have Andy Cap book. No. I do not. Therefore at time so I read this sort of comics and write about the train fare to the place where I know the Ed has not been or he is not going to but the houses after reading this, he will be damn sacred. I save his money.
I thank you
Firozali A. Mulla
There she wants you at in the front
[info]famulla wrote:
Monday, 25 May 2009 at 09:51 pm (UTC)
Indian riots follow murder of Sikh leader in Austria
The Prime Minister, Manmohan Singh, himself a Sikh, appealed for calm as police and demonstrators clashed in several north Indian cities.
I thank you
Firozali A. Mulla
UNFORGETABLE SIKH WOMAN WARRIOR : RANI JINDA KAUR
[info]gudiya4444 wrote:
Thursday, 30 July 2009 at 07:13 am (UTC)
WELL, SHE SET AN EXAMPLE OF BOTH A GOOD QUEEN FOR HER KINGDOM AND A GOOD MOTHER FOR HER SON DULEEP SINGH. AS A MOTHER SHE MADE HER SON LIVE HIS OWN IDENTITY WHICH HE LOST IN HANDS OF BRITISHERS AND AS A GOOD QUEEN SHE MADE HER SON REALISE THAT HE IS THE PRINCE OF THE KINGDOM AND HE HAS TO FIGHT FOR IT AGAINST THOSE WHO MISGUIDED OR MISLEAD HIM AND GET IT BACK FROM THEM
THUS MAHARANI JINDA KAUR IS NOT PROVED TO BE A MOTHER, A QUEEN BUT ALSO AN TRENDSETTER FOR THE ENTIRE WOMAN ENTITY THAT IF A WOMAN SHE WISHES SHE CAN WIN EVERYTHING BACK DESPITE OF THE FACT WHATEVER IS THOUGHT ABOUT HER . AS THE BRITISHERS THOUGHT THAT SHE BEING OLD AND BLIND CANNOT DO ANYTHING BUT SHE SHOWED THEM WHAT SHE WAS ................................BOLE SONIHAL SATSRIAKAL.
Re: UNFORGETABLE SIKH WOMAN WARRIOR : RANI JINDA KAUR
[info]jindan wrote:
Thursday, 3 September 2009 at 01:03 am (UTC)
Hello friends,

I am the reincarnation of Jindan Kaur.
My son Duleep is now Rajneesh, see his photo's on Oshoragneesh.net
Ranjit Singh was the mystic Master Osho-Bhagwan Shree Rahneesh.
The prophecies will be fullfilled when Duleep Singh will unite the world in a Universal faith!
The Great one eyed Maharaja is with us
The book has been written with love,
Leslie Sutain aka Rani Jindan

Most popular

Article Archive

Day In a Page

Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat

Select date