People

Partly Sunny with Showers 9° London Hi 12°C / Lo 6°C

The homecoming of Simon Mann

Jailed in Africa for plotting a coup, he can now retreat to a £5m home – but uncomfortable questions will not go away

By Cahal Milmo

With its sweeping views over the Solent, Palladian architecture and 20 acres of Hampshire pasture, Inchmery House stands in stark contrast to the concrete prison cell in Equatorial Guinea which Simon Mann had, until yesterday, called home.

The Old Etonian and ex-SAS officer had expected to remain incarcerated in the notorious Black Beach jail until his 90th birthday. Last night he was on his way back to his £5m British country residence via a five-star hotel in the oil-rich west African country after being granted a pardon by the authoritarian leader he had tried to depose in a botched coup.

Mann, 57, was released by President Teodoro Obiang Nguema, along with four others who had conspired to seize control of the tiny petro-state in 2004. Their failed attempt became known as the "Wonga coup" for its hugely lucrative ambitions and the alleged backing of a colourful cast of players that included Mark Thatcher and a Lebanese oil billionaire. Mann had stood to gain £9m if the coup had succeeded.

An Equatorial Guinean government spokesman said that Mann, who led a team of more than 60 battle-hardened South African mercenaries, had been released on "humanitarian grounds", citing his need for medical attention after a hernia operation last year. He had served less than two years of a 34-year sentence imposed last June.

The father-of-seven was met yesterday by his wife, Amanda, and sister, Sarah, after two months of secret negotiations. But when he touches down today on board a private jet, he will face a barrage of questions.

As well as meeting for the first time his five-year-old son Arthur, who was born shortly after his arrest in March 2004, Mann can expect a phone call from officers of Scotland Yard's counter-terrorism command. Police yesterday confirmed that an investigation is still ongoing into whether any offences were committed in Britain during the planning of the coup. It is expected that Mann, the scion of a brewing dynasty whose father and grandfather captained the England cricket team, will be questioned as a witness.

The Foreign Office said it had been told that the release was a personal decision by Mr Obiang, an autocratic ruler previously accused of cannibalism, who has ruled the former Spanish colony since 1979. Equatorial Guinea sits on vast petro-chemical reserves which make it sub-Saharan Africa's third largest oil producer and earn it £40m a day. Critics point out that despite such wealth, the country's population remains one of the most impoverished on the planet.

It is understood that the pardon was the result of a private deal between Mr Obiang and Mann under which the Briton pleaded guilty to leading the coup and provided a comprehensive account of the plot which portrayed him as an "accomplice" to a coterie of international businessmen who had acted with the tacit approval of the governments of Spain and South Africa.

During his testimony, Mann implicated Mr Thatcher, the son of the former prime minister, as one of five "managers" of the plot along with Eli Calil, a Lebanese-Nigerian oil trader based in London. Mr Thatcher was convicted in South Africa in 2005 of unwittingly helping to finance the plot when he paid £140,000 for a helicopter.

Bungled coup: Lines of inquiry

* Will Simon Mann stand by his testimony to a court in Equatorial Guinea that Mark Thatcher was part of the "management team" for the coup?

* Will the mercenary also continue to insist that Ely Calil, the reclusive Lebanese oil billionaire, was "the Cardinal" – the powerful businessman who originated the coup plot?

* Did the CIA blow the whistle on the coup attempt to protect the interests of American oil companies?

* Did the Spanish authorities give tacit approval to the plan to replace President Obiang with Severo Moto, an opposition leader in exile in Madrid?

* What knowledge did Britain have of the plans for the coup and did London seek to warn the Obiang regime of what was happening?

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

Simple Simon
[info]stuarttootell wrote:
Wednesday, 4 November 2009 at 01:11 am (UTC)
Do we really think the truth will come out ?

No it will not, far too many vested interests political and businesswise (read oil) for the truth to emerge.

Look at the players involved.None of them would know the truth if it stood up in front of them and said hello.
[info]berthadeeblues wrote:
Wednesday, 4 November 2009 at 03:50 am (UTC)
Stuarttootel,
we will probably never know the whole truth but happily recriminations and score settling will ensure this story will not just go away.
I imagine the idiot son of an influential ex- politician will be quaking in his boots at the truth coming out. Will mummy, reportedly now frail and gaga, be able to save his skin a second time?. And will we find out the true identity of the mysterious financial backer with the same name as another ex-politician, proven liar and jailbird and now best selling author?.
Let's settle back and enjoy the entertainment.



West backs odious regimes
[info]alexweir1949 wrote:
Wednesday, 4 November 2009 at 04:57 am (UTC)
The West backs odious regimes.

Mr Alex Weir, Baghdad and Harare
thatcher
[info]panic2009 wrote:
Wednesday, 4 November 2009 at 05:36 am (UTC)
would love to see that no mark mark thatcher in the dock. the first thing he did in south africa was blow the whistle on his mates when he had half the chance , to save his own skin. maybe justice will prevail
Justice??
[info]stickytruth2 wrote:
Wednesday, 4 November 2009 at 07:46 am (UTC)
To many big names in the dark background for the truth to come out.
Party Time?
[info]rendevou5 wrote:
Wednesday, 4 November 2009 at 09:20 am (UTC)
I'll bet Mark Thatcher is absolutely thrilled to bits.
No doubt he's already planning the "welcome home" party.
Tories
[info]gollymolly44 wrote:
Wednesday, 4 November 2009 at 09:35 am (UTC)
What a great reminder for those who long for a return of the party that was once lead by a women who, allegedly, allowed her son to profit greatly and illegally from the influence derived from her office. Wouldn't it be great if the truth came out round about election time.........
Only being told half the story
[info]allenn007 wrote:
Wednesday, 4 November 2009 at 09:56 am (UTC)
All looks very murky. We have to read between the lines, and oil may muddying the waters as ever. Perhaps the British Government along with the oil companies had something to do with Mann's release. ie a payoff. We will probably never know, although someone might blow the whistle somewhere down the line.

As for Mark Thatcher, he should stand trial now.
Tories
[info]pamelasburden wrote:
Wednesday, 4 November 2009 at 11:28 am (UTC)
I don't see that the bunch of self serving cretins that currently sit on the governing side of the house are any better?
Re: Tories
[info]gollymolly44 wrote:
Thursday, 5 November 2009 at 12:03 pm (UTC)
So you seem to agree that the Tories are as bad as a bunch of self-serving cretins - my point exactly.

Most popular

Article Archive

Day In a Page

Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat

Select date