People

Rain (AM and PM) 10° London Hi 13°C / Lo 7°C

The Rolling Stone who gathered no money

Ronnie Wood divorced by wife Jo – but where's the fortune?

By Jonathan Brown

Ronnie Wood with his wife Jo. The couple had been married for 24 year

AP

Ronnie Wood with his wife Jo. The couple had been married for 24 years

After 24 years, which have included repeated stints in rehab to battle alcoholism (Ronnie), lines of heroin and cocaine (Ronnie), a replacement plastic septum for his cocaine-ravaged nose (Ronnie), multiple music tours of the world and even a joint arrest for cocaine possession in the Caribbean, one of rock's most enduring marriages ended yesterday at the High Court in London.

Ronnie and Jo Wood, who met at the height of the Rolling Stones' fame and whose union endured decades of the guitarist's notoriously excessive lifestyle, were granted a decree nisi after he admitted adultery.

Details of the financial settlement were not made public but it was reported that Mrs Wood, 54, will receive £6.5m from her husband's fortune, which was valued at £35m earlier this year – half what it was.

The couple split after the 62-year-old grandfather-of-six embarked on an affair with a 20-year-old Russian cocktail waitress, Ekaterina Ivanova, during a vodka drinking spree in Ireland last year. Ms Ivanova was not mentioned in the court documents released – one of 23 "quickie" cases heard by a judge yesterday – but the star admitted adultery to his wife shortly before they separated.

Mrs Wood, who describes herself as a rock chick turned eco-warrior and now markets her own range of organic beauty products, stated that the relationship had broken down and she found it intolerable to live with her former husband.

Although there had been considerable speculation surrounding the size of the payout following Sir Paul McCartney's £24.3m settlement with Heather Mills, legal experts said it was a misconception that spouses could expect half their former partner's fortune.

Mr Wood's money ran out at least twice during their marriage. In a recent interview he admitted: "I'm a terrible businessman ... but I do try." His failed ventures include the nightclub Woody's, and he has been known to spend up to £1,000 a week on flowers, more on drugs and at one point £170,000 a year on chauffeured cars. His son Jamie conceded: "Ronnie's absolutely hopeless with money. He doesn't have a clue. First, because he never spends any. And then every so often he'll go off on a spree and be really guilty because he'll spend £10,000."

The guitarist officially joined the Rolling Stones in December 1976 when their biggest hits were largely behind them. He only became a full partner in the business in 1990 and enjoys none of the lucrative songwriting royalties shared by Mick Jagger and Keith Richards.

However he has toured with the band since 1975 and has a number of solo albums to his name. He wasalso a key member of The Faces when Rod Stewart was lead singer.

Wood has bought a new home close to Sandown Park racecourse complete with an octagonal tower and sweeping views over the Thames Valley. He has been as well known in recent years for his painting as his music – he once sold a canvas to an American collector for over £1m.

Mrs Wood has continued to live at the couple's £10m mansion at Kingston upon Thames in Surrey since the separation. It is understood that Mr Wood's estate in Co Kildare, Ireland, valued at £3m, has been on the market for much of this year.

She was a director of Wood's music company Rockyarch and company secretary of the painting business Scream Art. She also acted as Mr Wood's personal assistant during Rolling Stones tours, picking his clothes and cooking organic food for him on a travelling oven in their hotel rooms.

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

THE ROLLING STONE WHO GATHER NO DOSH !!
[info]doug_piranha wrote:
Thursday, 12 November 2009 at 08:31 am (UTC)
write some decent headlines

your headlines sound like cryptic clues to a crossword !!
THE POUND UNDER BROWN IS CERTAINLY DOWN
[info]sidsnot wrote:
Thursday, 12 November 2009 at 08:45 am (UTC)
When 35m is considered by the headline as gathering "no money". Then you begin to see how the Pound has crashed under the "great" leadership of Gordon Brown and his bunch of idiots.
Re: THE POUND UNDER BROWN IS CERTAINLY DOWN
[info]ceej1979 wrote:
Thursday, 12 November 2009 at 03:23 pm (UTC)
Even for a loony tory, that's certainly stretching a story a bit!

Have you ever considered a career with The Sun or Fox news?
Re: THE POUND UNDER BROWN IS CERTAINLY DOWN
[info]ceej1979 wrote:
Thursday, 12 November 2009 at 03:26 pm (UTC)
Deary me.

Even for a tory that's a bit of a "stretch".

Maybe start a career with The Sun:

"Ronny Wood, destitute, because of Labour's awful economic policy".

Sub heading:

"He's had to sell one of his 8 solid gold guitars. Probably to raise money for some sort of helicopter for "our boys"
Ronnie Wood's Money
[info]scousekraus wrote:
Thursday, 12 November 2009 at 09:15 am (UTC)
How out of touch you must be if you think a fortune of Ł35 million pound is "no money". I suppose if you are a highly paid journalist on a newspaper that has consistently lost money since it was launched then you are bound to be as out of touch as this drug addled, hired hand guitarist (and by the way, perhaps it's no accident that the Stones have not made a decent record since he joined)
Jagger, Richards & Klein
[info]emma_townshend wrote:
Thursday, 12 November 2009 at 09:36 am (UTC)
Though Mick Jagger and Keith Richards have made the best of their touring earnings, "songwriting royalties" from many of their biggest hits don't go to them. Instead, the cash goes to ex-manager Allen Klein. Only songs from after 1971, when they broke with Klein, are exempt. Klein was a properly machiavellian character who went on to fall out with several members of the Beatles too. As he died earlier this year, I'm sure a juicy biography should be on its way....
/facepalm
[info]thelzdking wrote:
Thursday, 12 November 2009 at 10:22 am (UTC)
Read the headline properly you idiots. It says 'gathered no money' then points out that his Ł35m fortune is half what it was, hence he has gathered no money.

Sigh.
Re: /facepalm
[info]leedsman wrote:
Thursday, 12 November 2009 at 01:14 pm (UTC)
Don't spoil our fun!
Re: /facepalm
[info]thelzdking wrote:
Thursday, 12 November 2009 at 01:49 pm (UTC)
Heheheh, fair point!
[info]hebdenbiker wrote:
Thursday, 12 November 2009 at 12:40 pm (UTC)
Boo hoo.
I wish I had "no money"...
[info]leedsman wrote:
Thursday, 12 November 2009 at 01:13 pm (UTC)
Ł35 million is nothing??? Is this Zimbabwe?

On another note, did anyone see that thing in Australia where the guy had to pay his lover when they split up - even though he was married? I think I might have to go into business as a groupie or something. I can't imagine the Stones being that fussy these days :)
Re: I wish I had "no money"...
[info]tallbendyman wrote:
Thursday, 12 November 2009 at 03:50 pm (UTC)
Zimbabwe? No - not yet, but The Dear Leader is working on it.
Anyway, who cares a stuff?
[info]fumanchuria wrote:
Thursday, 12 November 2009 at 03:15 pm (UTC)
The whole bunch of them, including the beeetles, can self ignite and I wouldn't p*ss on them. I lived through that era and none of that bunch of self positioned, media induced bunch of nonentities made any difference to serious issues, well, maybe Lennon to some small extent.
Why does the media, whilst massaging the views of the weak minded, so glorify the banal whilst at the same time and in equal quantity, if not more so, trivialise really important matters?
Re: Anyway, who cares a stuff?
[info]leedsman wrote:
Thursday, 12 November 2009 at 04:09 pm (UTC)
You must be a laugh riot at parties

:)

Seriously though, I'm not sure what your point is. Should every column in every paper cover a serious issue in a serious way? The trouble is that no-one particularly wants to read that stuff. If you do, you buy the FT or the Washington Post or something. I don't think that papers massage the views of the weak, I think the weak choose the papers that seem to flatter them
Re: Anyway, who cares a stuff?
[info]fumanchuria wrote:
Friday, 13 November 2009 at 01:18 pm (UTC)

I tend to agree with your last sentence.
Also, it's probably difficult to appreciate the straights that a great %'age of the World's population find themselves in when one lives in Western Europe or North America.
I haven't changed my mind about most things since I was a VIth Former; Homo Sapiens is a greedy, warlike, selfish and self centred curse on creation, and I'm not religious, indeed a non believer. This is probably in line with Dawkins' views and the imperatives of 'The Selfish Gene'.
Re: Anyway, who cares a stuff?
[info]nigshakespeare wrote:
Thursday, 12 November 2009 at 07:59 pm (UTC)
Because the world would be a dismal place indeed if it was full of miserable types like you who are preoccupied with being "serious". They were entertainers, not dull politicians or agitprops. Jeez, life must be dull when the only time you get out is popping down to the local pharmacy for your prescription.
Re: Anyway, who cares a stuff?
[info]fumanchuria wrote:
Friday, 13 November 2009 at 01:05 pm (UTC)
Au contraire mon ami; I have a fabulous time, not one bit of which is created or amended by the small minded creeps who seem to have to have some sort of god-like figure to worship.
What makes people want to worship some really ugly little wan*er like jagger, who makes no noise worth putting one's hearing at risk for? I, on the other hand, notwithstanding being an atheist, get real joy from listening to the singing of say a blackbird and marvel at the power of thought of a genius like Stephen Hawkin. In this context, how does some single brain cell footballer "Have genius in his feet". Otherwise my Ferrari, Corvette and Mustang give me great fun.
Ugh, mankind, a very flawed species.
No dosh
[info]ceej1979 wrote:
Thursday, 12 November 2009 at 03:22 pm (UTC)
I'd say Ł35 million, for a sessions guitarist, is probably a bit far from "no dosh".

I think it's more the fact that the paper doesn't understand how royalties are split. Paul MCCartney and Lennon made 10x what Ringo did in the Beatles.

Bearing in mind Starr is "only" worth Ł100 million. And he was part of the band from the very start, and played on all of their huge selling tours, album and singles.

I'd say 35 million for a guy who hasn't played on a single hit record, or album is probably pretty decent
Madness
[info]nigshakespeare wrote:
Thursday, 12 November 2009 at 07:55 pm (UTC)
What on earth was Ronnie thinking?! Talk about an old age crisis. Jo is utterly adorable. He can't be thinking straight.
Re: Madness
[info]littleglimmer wrote:
Thursday, 12 November 2009 at 10:47 pm (UTC)
Having seen the Stones many times and Strictly just once, I can say that he moves his legs better than she does.
sdh
[info]sukeea wrote:
Thursday, 26 November 2009 at 05:05 am (UTC)
In 2008, a judge acquitted three police officers Runes of Magic Gold in the fatal shooting of Sean Bell, an unarmed man killed in a 50-shot barrage Rom Gold on his wedding day. Bell was killed outside a strip club on Nov. 25, 2006, as he was leaving Buy Rom Gold his bachelor party. Undercover officers investigating reports of prostitution at the club said they thought one of the men in Bell's group had a gun.

Also, Cheap Rom Gold I didn't find any of the secret levels on the snowy island. The shinies don't show up against a white Rom Power Levevling background. Can you tell me which paddocks to look at more closely?

EDITOR'S CHOICE


Most popular

Article Archive

Day In a Page

Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat

Select date