People

Showers (AM and PM) 15° London Hi 19°C / Lo 14°C

Peter Ayliffe: Watchdogs fire plastic bullets, but Visa will stick to its guns

The credit card giant is a consumer champion, says the chief executive, but some retailers won't agree and they may not share his vision of a cashless world

By Tim Webb

Normally irrepressibly cheerful, Peter Ayliffe looks traumatised for a moment. I have just told him that my local newsagent had charged me 50p that morning to use my Visa debit card to renew my Oyster travelcard.

He sighs. "You were clearly upset having to pay 50p," the chief executive of Visa Europe sympathises. It wasn't really that emotional but his concern for a humble Visa Delta cardholder is touching. "I don't blame you," he continues. "Why should you have to pay? Surcharging for consumers is ridiculous."

Visa is the world's largest card company, operating the infra-structure to process credit and debit card payments. Last year, its Visa Europe subsidiary, which is owned by 4,500 European banks, handled €1.2 trillion (£800bn) of payments.

Ayliffe makes an unlikely consumer champion. The fees imposed on retailers by the credit card providers to process these payments are the subject of multi-billion-dollar lawsuits in the US and several regulatory inquiries in the UK and continental Europe. Incredibly, if a Visa card issued to a consumer in one European country is used in another, the merchant bank representing the retailer is charged a default rate of around €0.26 by the issuing bank for each transaction. Separate fees for same-country transactions are not published and vary wildly, but the average charge for each retailer in the UK is likely to be of a similar size. Clearly, this is a huge extra cost for the retailer on smaller payments.

Visa says these controversial "interchange" fees are necessary to share the costs of issuing cards and building the payment network. Neelie Kroes, the European Union Competition Commissioner, is not so sure and has said the level of interchange charges is "not justified".

Last month, the Office of Fair Trading turned the heat up further on the credit card companies when it announced it would investigate the fees levied on retailers.

Given all the flak being aimed at his company, it is not surprising Ayliffe is a little bit sensitive to shops charging 50p to accept Visa cards. This surcharge dwarfs the actual cost to the retailer of processing the payment, he says.

Visa Europe, he stresses, is a non-profit-making organisation owned by Europe's banks and should not be blamed for this retail profiteering.

While Visa Europe may not make money from interchange, clearly its members do. A large store like Tesco may be able to negotiate favourable fees with the credit card firms but a local newsagent is unlikely to be able to command a similar discount. And given that the UK card market is in effect sewn up by two players - Visa and Mastercard - there is nowhere else to go.

Ayliffe gamely rejects the idea that a duopoly exists. "You wouldn't expect me to agree with that and I certainly don't," he says, adding that American Express is a third player. And while seeming to accept there is limited scope for competition, he points out that his industry isn't alone in this: "How many Railtracks do you want? How many infrastructures do you want for people to compete on?"

The European Commission has softened its stance a little on interchange after questioning whether it was needed at all. "There is now acceptance that this is the oil which makes this whole industry tick. You need a commercial level," says Ayliffe. The question now is, what level?"

He avoids portraying Visa Europe as the victim of a regulatory witch-hunt. Asked if he feels unfairly targeted, he replies diplomatically: "No, we work well with regulators." But possibly in a sideswipe at the OFT, he adds: "One issue we have is that you have the EC, which tries to establish the rules for operating on a pricing basis. Then every national regulator thinks they should also have a say. It's frustrating when you have agreed something with the EC, which should make the decision."

Another factor complicating negotiations with the EC - and one that possibly strengthens Ayliffe's hand - is the plan for a Single Euro Payments Area (Sepa), due to come into effect on 1 January next year. The EU hopes this will harmonise how debit and credit card payments are processed - and the fees that are charged - across the eurozone. The aim is to cut the cost of moving money around Europe, which currently stands at 2.5 to 3 per cent of total GDP.

Ayliffe says greater harmonisation will also allow Visa to compete more effectively in other countries. "In Germany, for example, if you have a debit card it only works in Germany. It does not transfer out of the country unless you co-badge with one of the other schemes like Maestro, which is less of an international card than Visa. There has been no competition in the market." Visa Europe is now in the process of launching the V Pay debit card, targeted mainly at Germany but approved for use anywhere in Europe.

The banks need to get behind Sepa for it to happen on time and as planned. But anything that encourages greater use of cards is in their interests. It may seem odd to think of cash as having a cost, but Ayliffe says collecting and counting cash can be much more expensive than processing card payments, though the British Retail Consortium argues that for smaller transactions cash is often cheaper for business.

Returning to the news- agent charging 50p for card payments, Ayliffe says: "That is illogical because it drives everyone to start using cash again, which is more inefficient, expensive and less secure. This idea that cash doesn't cost any money and there is no additional expense from the retailer in terms of their prices is ridiculous." Some shops, he believes, will soon start charging customers for using cash.

Meanwhile, the plastic providers press on with the revolution. New types of credit, debit and pre-pay cards are being introduced to take advantage of the scanners now installed in many stores in the UK. In December, Barclays and Visa Europe announced the trial of an Oyster credit card: items can be bought in shops by waving it in front of a scanner or by entering a PIN number.

Some mobile phone firms are also introducing handsets that can be used to make payments and receive banking information such as balance statements. Visa is trialling such a device with Nokia, and Ayliffe does not see the mobile companies' involvement as a threat. "It's another growth area. I see us working in partnership with them, not them wanting to cut out Visa or Mastercard. Because you have to build the infrastructure, they realise that's not their job. They don't want to have to put it in place."

By 2012, Ayliffe believes that most consumers will have dispensed with coins and notes altogether. But there is a long way to go before we become a cashless society, with some 80 per cent of payments in Europe still being made using cash or cheque. Ayliffe acknowledges he has to get the retailers onside. "The first people we have to convince of what we are doing are the merchants, as they have to put the infrastructure in place. If we don't get the prices right, we won't succeed."

But if the price is right, cash won't be king for too much longer.

BIOGRAPHY

Born 5 March 1953.

Education BA Hons in economics - Manchester University.

Career

1974-85: National Westminster Bank - economics unit and market research.

1985-2003: Lloyds TSB Group - director of product marketing (TSB); branch network director; managing director, personal banking.

2003-05: Lloyds TSB - main board director with responsibility for UK retail banking.

2006 to now: president and chief executive, Visa Europe.

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

cash less
[info]ramadurais wrote:
Tuesday, 30 June 2009 at 01:10 am (UTC)
The availability of US$ currencies in international markets is funding terror . A drug smuggler from Afghanistan and Pakistan is able to sell their produce in many countries and cash them as US$. This currency is used to buy illegal arms and pay the mercenaries from Somalia . Common people who use hawala send money home also make these terrors are legal money changers.

In all countries the legal tender is the currency of the nation. Most carry credit / debit cards. All tourists can be facilitated to draw the currency of their destination country at the air port of arrival. That way the need to carry money can be blocked. It is not possible to carry gold and gold is breakable in small denomination.

If euro and US$ is banned outside their nations then the funding of terror at grass root level will get blocked. US$ / euro currency offers more portability, tradability and the convenience of matching the payment requirement dynamically. This is not possible with gold. With gold petty thieves will steal increasing the risk for terror to transport. The metal also get detected easily.

So to stop terror funding and international crime ban only the US$ currency outside US and Euro outside euro zone.

Ramadurai.

Article Archive

Day In a Page

Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat

Select date