Royal employees spent pounds 1m decorating own apartments
Monday 08 December 1997
A row over the Royal Family's reluctance to disclose its affairs has caused a five-year delay in publication of the final report on property services, salaries and accommodation in its palaces. Hearings were held two years ago but letters and questions have been going back and forth ever since.
Finally the PAC is ready to produce its report but, under a Conservative chairman, it will stop short of demanding that the Royals should hand back one or more of their five publicly owned and funded palaces. However, Labour members who have campaigned for greater openness and accountability will call for further action.
Evidence submitted to the committee has revealed that two senior royal employees have spent more than pounds 1.1m doing up their own personal apartments.
Michael Peat, the Royal Household's director of finance, and John Tiltman, its director of property services, have both moved into the accommodation in Kensington Palace. Mr Peat pays pounds 338 per week in rent, while Mr Tiltman's job comes with a salary reduced by pounds 230 per week in lieu of rent. Neither has to pay council tax or other bills.
Before moving into the palace, Mr Peat lived in Wandsworth and Mr Tiltman in Croydon. Mr Peat was given pounds 115,000 from the public purse for furniture.
The report will say the accommodation given to relatives, employees and pensioners of the Royal household is so valuable that if market rents were charged most could never afford to live there. It is also expected to raise the question of how the occupants can pay the tax which should be chargeable on the dwellings, which are regarded by the government as taxable benefits.
The Royal Family has promised to cut down the number of grace and favour homes, employees' residences and pensioners' apartments which are maintained by the public.
But since 1994 the number has remained steady at 285. The Royal Household has promised to reduce that to 205 as they became vacant, but there has been no change.
The Royals object to the use of the term "grace and favour," saying almost all the accommodation is for royals, employees and pensioners. In evidence to the committee officials said in the next generation the only family members with the right to accommodation would be the Queen's four children and Princes Harry and William.
Many of those who live in the palaces have only nominal duties. For example, 13 military knights of Windsor Castle are given homes because they are required to attend weekly services in ceremonial dress.
When evidence was given to the committee two years ago, eight apartments were occupied by royals, 226 by current employees, 27 by former employees and four through "grace and favour" arrangements.
The Royal Family receives pounds 7.9m a year from the Civil List, which pays the salaries of major royals and 296 staff, plus pounds 20.6m in grant-in-aid which is used for the upkeep of the royal palaces. In return, revenues of around pounds 80m are returned to the state.
The rents and salary abatements on the apartments come to pounds 400,000 per year - half the annual cost of maintenance.
One Labour member of the committee, Alan Williams, has been a long-term campaigner against excessive funding of the royals. He has also asked how the accommodation is properly taxed if it has never been valued. The last Chancellor, Kenneth Clarke, said the flats and houses were taxable benefits like any other.
Mr Williams said the Royal family should be made to give back Kensington Palace, St James' Palace and Clarence House - once the Queen Mother had died - to the state. They could live quite comfortably in Buckingham Palace and Windsor Castle, he said.
A Buckingham Palace spokeswoman said there had never been any question of Mr Peat or Mr Tiltman benefiting personally from the refurbishment of their flats. The money would be recouped in rent over a 30-year period, she said, and much of it was required for fire safety reasons.
"No grace and favour accommodation has been granted since 1991, and as they die it will become vacant. We made it clear that there are no plans to move members of the family who are currently there out."
- 1 Russell Brand accuses FOX News anchor Sean Hannity of terrorism after aggressive Israel-Gaza debate
- 2 Pope Francis issues top 10 tips for happiness – including don’t try to convert other people
- 3 Arturo Vidal to Manchester United: Midfielder set to force through move to Louis van Gaal's Red Devils - reports
- 4 Disney heiress Abigail disowns her share of family profits in West Bank company
- 5 Israel's propaganda machine is finally starting to misfire
Russell Brand accuses FOX News anchor Sean Hannity of terrorism after aggressive Israel-Gaza debate
Pope Francis issues top 10 tips for happiness – including don’t try to convert other people
Sabina Altynbekova, the girl branded 'too good looking' for volleyball, says social media obsession with her is a 'bit much'
Justin Bieber posts Instagram photo of Orlando Bloom crying after Ibiza fight 'over Miranda Kerr'
Disney heiress Abigail disowns her share of family profits in West Bank company
The secret report that helps Israel hide facts
Land for gas: Merkel and Putin discussed secret deal could end Ukraine crisis
Woman and two children killed by mob in riots over 'blasphemous' Facebook post in Pakistan
A day in the life of Vladimir Putin: The dictator in his labyrinth
Putin is 'thuggish, dishonest and reckless', says British ambassador to US
Richard Dawkins tweets: 'Date rape is bad, stranger rape is worse'
- < Previous
- Next >
£35000 - £40000 per annum + competitive: Progressive Recruitment: .Mid Level V...
£40000 - £45000 per annum + Competitive Benefits: Progressive Recruitment: Dig...
£40000 - £50000 per annum + Car, Medical, Fuel + More!: Progressive Recruitmen...
£50000 - £60000 per annum + benefits: Progressive Recruitment: An absolutely o...