Digital cameras: Choosing the right one for you
The range of equipment on offer can overwhelm newcomers to the digital world. Mark Harris gets you started
Friday 18 November 2005
You're pushing a trolley through the supermarket when you spot a pyramid of digital cameras, piled up high and selling cheap. Or you might be browsing online when up flashes a special offer on the latest five-megapixel camera. Should you join the digital revolution and snap up a new snapper, or will your ageing film camera last another holiday? Before you take the plunge, look beyond the price with exclamation marks and consider just what going digital involves.
Digital cameras have never been cheaper - or more powerful - than they are today, with the average selling price dropping about 25 per cent over the last year. But digital photography is very different from traditional 35mm photography, and if you invest in all the possible extras, you could end up with a bill several times the cost of the camera itself.
Everyone has a horror story about ruining a whole holiday's worth of photos by opening the back without rewinding the film first. But the truth is that film photography is pretty simple: you buy a film, take your pictures, then hand the film over to a photo lab to develop and print your images.
With digital cameras, you have the choice of overseeing every aspect of your photography, from the way the camera sees the outside world, to the detail and quality of the images it captures, and finally the transfer, storage, editing and printing of the final photos. It needn't be an expensive process but the camera and accessories you choose will determine how much you spend in the years ahead.
The first thing to consider is whether to buy extra insurance. Digital cameras are more complex than film cameras and are packed with expensive (and delicate) components such as LCD screens and high tech chips. Most cameras come with a 12-month warranty to cover faults in manufacture only. Buying an extended warranty might increase this to three years, but you'll get nothing if you drop your camera in the sand at the beach, or take your eyes off it for a moment in a busy pub.
Insurance including cover for accidental damage and theft starts from £15 a year for a £300 camera. Shop around for the best price and read the small print as some policies carry hefty excesses.
All digital cameras should come with the absolute basics you need to get shooting: a battery for power and a memory card (or built-in memory) for storing digital images. But if you want to take a camera away on holiday - or even out for a full day's shooting - you'll need to spend a bit more immediately.
Just turning the camera on and framing pictures uses a lot of power, and that's before you factor in power-draining features like zooming and using the built-in flash. Even the most efficient cameras can run through a fully charged battery in just a few hours if you're snapping away, so always carry a back-up set.
Unfortunately, most rechargeable batteries are custom-made to fit just one camera and a replacement can cost up to £35. If you're lucky enough to have a camera that uses common batteries (such as AA cells), you should be able to pick up high capacity rechargeable batteries and a charger for around £20, or even less. Look for batteries with 2000mAh capacity or higher to get the most shots from each charge.
Your other big investment will be memory cards. Most cameras come with just 16Mb or 32Mb of storage included. That's barely enough for a handful of best quality images on today's cameras, so think of it more as an emergency reserve. A 512Mb card (£30-£50) should be enough to get you through a week's holiday, or consider a 1GB card (from £50) if you enjoy shooting memory-hungry movie clips. Remember that, unlike film, you can use these cards over and over again.
The good news for your bank balance is that digital cameras and home computers are no longer joined at the hip. If you don't want to come to terms with a PC, you can simply take the memory card from your camera to almost any high-street photo lab and they'll do all the hard work, from editing and cropping your images to producing prints and even backing up your images to CD.
One of the best things about going digital is that you only need to print the images you want. A single postcard-sized 10x15cm print usually costs around 49p at a photo lab, but prices drop quickly if you order more. Shop around and you should be able to get 50 photos for around 15p each - or even as little as 10p with special offers.
You can also print at home without a computer, using a modern inkjet printer. Photo-quality printers cost from around £75 and connect with a cable to your camera, letting you choose what to print from its screen. More expensive printers have built-in memory-card readers and sometimes even their own LCD displays for editing images. Printing a 10x15cm photo at home costs from around 20p.
If you do want to explore the "digital darkroom" side of photography, home computers are far more approachable and easy to use than they were even a few years ago. A new computer can cost anything from £300 to £3,000, but even the cheapest will be capable of running image editing software, burning CDs for storage and connecting to the internet for ordering prints online or creating a web gallery from your photos.
If you already have a computer, most cameras come with basic image editing software for free. When you're ready to step up to something a little more advanced, a package like Adobe Photoshop Elements (£70) is powerful and not too tricky to use, although you will need to devote some time to getting to grips with the terminology.
So is it worth switching to digital? Although the cost of the equipment is daunting, a digital photographer printing a fifth of their images will pay around £50 less than a similar film photographer using 10 rolls of film - and the more you shoot, the more you'll save.
Ultimately, unless you take (and print) several hundred images a year, you're unlikely to save too much money by going digital. But the ease of shooting with an LCD screen, e-mailing images to friends and printing photos at home can't be matched by film cameras - and that kind of convenience can't be measured in pounds and pence.
Swedish stars ask fans for £195 pledges on crowd-funding website
voicesJust when you thought you could find a man, get married, and have a baby by the age of 35... it turns out you’re too late, says Grace Dent
sportNapoli 2 Arsenal 0: Gunners must now face either Real Madrid, PSG, Bayern Munich, Atletico Madrid or Barcelona in knock-out stages
musicAs Mariah Carey and Noddy Holder rake in the royalties from their classics, why there hasn't been a decent festive hit for 20 years?
theatreAuthor Daniel Rosenthal recalls the mishaps that almost brought the curtain down on the likes of John Gielgud and Diana Rigg
filmFilm producers sue Warner Bros for $75m over Hobbit films
lifeAs the Royal Mail plans to phase out deliveries on two wheels, it's no wonder posties are in a spin
musicThe 21-year-old beat Ella Eyre and Chlöe Howl to win the honour
lifeFull of the joys and want to help your fellow man? December isn't the time to do it
techLuke Blackall reports on precision engineered prams and babygros that monitor your child 24-7
Nelson Mandela memorial: ‘Bogus’ interpreter made mockery of Barack Obama’s tribute
David Cameron explains selfie with Obama and Helle Thorning-Schmidt at Mandela Memorial
French café starts charging extra to rude customers
Krokodil in Mexico? Teenager hospitalised after 'injecting drug into her genitals'
Australia incest case: Filthy and severely deformed children found in remote farming community after generations of inbreeding
- 1 Nelson Mandela memorial: ‘Bogus’ interpreter made mockery of Barack Obama’s tribute
- 2 It’s shameful that our universities have accepted gender segregation under pressure from the most oppressive religious fanatics
- 3 John McAfee's $100 'anti-NSA' device: 'this is coming and cannot be stopped'
- 4 Is Facebook making us forget? Study shows that taking pictures ruin memories
- 5 Australia incest case: Filthy and severely deformed children found in remote farming community after generations of inbreeding
- < Previous
- Next >
£77099.84 - £96375.26 per annum + Bonus + Benefits : Harrington Starr: My clie...
£45000 - £60000 per annum + Bonus and Package: Harrington Starr: Trading appli...
£35000 - £38000 per annum + Benefits: Harrington Starr: C# .NET Developer (Win...
£60000 - £70000 per annum + Benefits: Harrington Starr: Senior QA Engineer Tes...