Fertility expert: 'I can clone a human being'
Controversial doctor filmed creating embryos before injecting them into wombs of women wanting cloned babies
Cady, died aged 10 in a car crash in the US. Her blood cells were frozen and sent to Dr Zavos, who fused them with cow eggs to create cloned human animal hybrid embryos
A controversial fertility doctor claimed yesterday to have cloned 14 human embryos and transferred 11 of them into the wombs of four women who had been prepared to give birth to cloned babies.
The cloning was recorded by an independent documentary film-maker who has testified to The Independent that the cloning had taken place and that the women were genuinely hoping to become pregnant with the first cloned embryos specifically created for the purposes of human reproduction.
Panayiotis Zavos has broken the ultimate taboo of transferring cloned embryos into the human womb, a procedure that is a criminal offence in Britain and illegal in many other countries. He carried out the work at a secret lab-oratory, probably located in the Middle East where there is no cloning ban. Dr Zavos, a naturalised American, also has fertility clinics in Kentucky and Cyprus, where he was born. His patients – three married couples and a single woman – came from Britain, the United States and an unspecified country in the Middle East.
None of the embryo transfers led to a viable pregnancy but Dr Zavos said yesterday that this was just the "first chapter" in his ongoing and serious attempts at producing a baby cloned from the skin cells of its "parent".
"There is absolutely no doubt about it, and I may not be the one that does it, but the cloned child is coming. There is absolutely no way that it will not happen," Dr Zavos said in an interview yesterday with The Independent.
"If we intensify our efforts we can have a cloned baby within a year or two, but I don't know whether we can intensify our efforts to that extent. We're not really under pressure to deliver a cloned baby to this world. What we are under pressure to do is to deliver a cloned baby that is a healthy one," he said.
His claims are certain to be denounced by mainstream fertility scientists who in 2004 tried to gag Dr Zavos by imploring the British media not to give him the oxygen of publicity without him providing evidence to back up his statements. Despite a lower profile over the past five years, scores of couples have now approached Dr Zavos hoping that he will help them to overcome their infertility by using the same cloning technique that was used to create Dolly the sheep in 1996.
"I get enquiries every day. To date we have had over 100 enquiries and every enquiry is serious. The criteria is that they have to consider human reproductive cloning as the only option available to them after they have exhausted everything else," Dr Zavos said.
"We are not interested in cloning the Michael Jordans and the Michael Jacksons of this world. The rich and the famous don't participate in this."
It took 277 attempts to create Dolly but since then the cloning procedure in animals has been refined and it has now become more efficient, although most experts in the field believe that it is still too dangerous to be allowed as a form of human fertility treatment. Dr Zavos dismissed these fears saying that many of the problems related to animal cloning – such as congenital defects and oversized offspring – have been minimised.
"In the future, when we get serious about executing things correctly,
this thing will be very easy to do," he said. "If we find out that
this technique does not work, I don't intend to step on dead bodies to
achieve something because I don't have that kind of ambition. My ambition is
to help people."
Dr Zavos also revealed that he has produced cloned embryos of three dead
people, including a 10-year-old child called Cady, who died in a car crash.
He did so after being asked by grieving relatives if he could create
biological clones of their loved ones.
Dr Zavos fused cells taken from these corpses not with human eggs but with
eggs taken from cows that had their own genetic material removed. He did
this to create a human-animal hybrid "model" that would allow him
to study the cloning procedure.
Dr Zavos emphasised that it was never his intention to transfer any of these
hybrid embryos into the wombs of women, despite Cady's mother saying she
would sanction this if there was any hope of her child's clone being born.
"I would not transfer those embryos. We never did this in order to
transfer those embryos," Dr Zavos said. "The hybrid model is the
thing that saved us. It's a model for us to learn. First you develop a model
and then you go on to the target. We did not want to experiment on human
embryos, which is why we developed the hybrid model."
Dr Zavos is collaborating with Karl Illmensee, who has a long track record in
cloning experiments dating back to pioneering studies in the early 1980s.
They are about to recruit 10 younger couples in need of fertility treatment
for the next chapter in his attempts at producing cloned babies.
"I think we know why we did not have a pregnancy," said Dr Zavos. "I
think that the circumstances were not as ideal as we'd like them to be.
We've done the four couples so far under the kind of limitations that we
were working under.
"We think we know why those four transfers didn't take. I think with
better subjects – and there are hundreds of people out there who want to do
this – if we choose 10 couples, I think we will get some to carry a
pregnancy."
All the cloning attempts, which date back to 2003, were filmed by Peter
Williams, a distinguished documentary maker, for the Discovery Channel,
which will show the programme tonight at 9pm.
Williams said that he was present at the secret laboratory when the cloning
was carried out by Dr Illmensee. "There's never been any question of
concealment, because we'd have known about it," Williams said.
The little girl who could 'live' again
Little Cady died aged 10 in a car crash in the US. Her blood cells were frozen
and sent to Dr Zavos, who fused them with cow eggs to create cloned
human-animal hybrid embryos.
These hybrid embryos were developed in the test tube and used to study the
cloning process, but were not transferred into a human womb, despite Cady's
mother saying she would sanction this if there was a chance the clone of her
little girl could be born. Dr Zavos said he would never transfer hybrid
animal clones into the human womb.
However, cells from Cady's "embryo" could in the future be extracted
from the frozen hybrid embryo and fused with an empty human egg with its
nucleus removed. This double cloning process could produce a human embryo
that Dr Zavos said could be transferred into the womb to produce Cady's
clone.
Frontiers of fertility: The key questions
Q. What does he claim to have done?
A. Panayiotis Zavos says he has created 14 human embryos and
transferred 11 of them into the wombs of four women. Some of these embryos
only developed to the four-cell stage before being transferred, but some
developed to the 32-cell stage, called a morula. He also claims to have
created human-bovine hybrid clones by transferring the cells of dead people
into the empty eggs of cows. However, these hybrid embryos were used for
research purposes and were not transferred to the womb.
Q. How does this compare to scientists' previous achievements?
A. Other scientists have created human-cloned embryos but not for the
purposes of transferring them to wombs in order for women to give birth to
babies. Those researchers created cloned human embryos in the test tube to
extract stem cells for research. Dr Zavos has gone further (and broken a
taboo) by creating embryos specifically for human reproduction, and he has
attempted to create a viable pregnancy by transferring the cloned embryos
into women.
Q. Hasn't he made similar claims before?
A. In 2004, Dr Zavos claimed to have transferred a cloned human embryo
into a woman's womb but did not produce hard evidence. He has now produced
more cloned human embryos, some at an advanced stage, and transferred them
into the wombs of three more women. An independent documentary maker vouches
for him.
Q. Why is this such a controversial thing to do?
A. Studies on animal cloning have shown time and time again that it is
unsafe. The cloned animals suffer a higher-than-normal risk of severe
developmental problems and the pregnancies often end in miscarriage.
Mainstream scientists believe cloning is too dangerous to be used on humans.
Q. How likely is it that he will succeed?
A. He is determined to succeed and has a long line of people eager to
sign up to his cloning programme, at a cost of between $45,000 and $75,000.
Cloning attempts in other species, including primates, suggest there is no
insuperable barrier to cloning humans.
Watch the exclusive video of Panayiotis Zavos performing the cloning procedure
View all comments that have been posted about this article.
Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.
- Print Article
- Email Article
-
Click here for copyright permissions
Copyright 2009 Independent News and Media Limited


Comments
a discovery made by internet marketing experts but in the scientific field, for sure
Olga
Australia, Sydney
Just a point for discussion.
http://www.kadir-buxton.com/page3.h
Why don?t you tell him to clone a rat to start with? I am sending 30 Indian Rupees that I have since 1945. The way I see this is. The, laboratory need the light, air condition, the incubators, the food for the infants the as the rats grow their appetite increase, then we need the powder milk, the maid to clean the wastages, the jerry cans, the dust bins, the bigger windows and doors, more doctors to give the inoculations o they could not die of aids. . Tell me. Do you hold any share in this venture?
I thank you
Firozali A. Mulla
Also, this issue also shows how children have been reduced to objects. If someone can't have one, he will do whatever it takes to make science produce one for him. This is the definition of a consumer good.
And the flip-side of course is abortion, if we don't want it, we can get rid of it.
Why doesn't the world just grow-up and accept responsibility for themselves and their bodies. If God gives you a child, embrace it, or offer it to someone who can't have one.
If you can't have a child, offer to love and take someone else's child, or accept the fact that you can't have a child.
Are we that immature that we can't accept personal disruptions or disappointments in life? If this is the case, society and culture can hardly develop and prosper.
The world is overpopulated now, where straining our National Resources and ecosystems to their limit.
If you can't have children without cloning or being implanted, how about adopting a child that is already in this world with out parents.
I'm sorry but this is just sick and twisted in my book. I barbaric mentality of man or woman wanting to propagate his seed. And has very little to do with the love of a child.
Many people say man was made in some god's image, I say man made his god in his own image because he thinks he is god and above nature. Just keep on in this way and something we are responsible for is bound to come right back at us and knock us off our perch.
KC
In my opinion, for what it's worth, Zavros is in no way ethical. human/cow hybrids? or chimaera? says it all doesn't it?
However, in the background, simmering away, is the fact that humans in the western world are slowly becoming more infertile ... not that one would actually notice this fact, never the less, it is well documented...so eventually, I suppose it could be said that cloning may be the saviour of the human race at some distant point in the future?
At any rate it is certainly less unethical than the Westerners' use and abuse of poor Indian women, who, for a very modes pay, do all the "pregnancy work" for them. And this, recently more and more common "practice" generates less outrage than the cloning itself...
Cheers!!!
Read the novel Frankenstien and maybe this will shed some light.
"Our way" we say, "now!" we demand, at any price we will seek what we think WE think we need.
I have found that pain we go through is a necessary step in enhancing our compassion for others. Life without pain is a fantasy and at times unavoidable.
Love is patient, kind, not self seeking...etc.
The bible teaches these things, but do we listen? Not always. I find that when I do listen to Him though,, my pain is often less and my anxiety is overcome with comfort and reassurance, in Him not in myself.
Read the novel Frankenstein and maybe this will shed some light on a similar situation.