Research team apologises for errors in fake stem cell breakthrough
Steve Connor is the Science Editor of The Independent and i. He has won many awards for his journalism, including five-times winner of the prestigious British science writers’ award; the David Perlman Award of the American Geophysical Union; four times highly commended as specialist journalist of the year in the UK Press Awards; UK health journalist of the year and a special merit award of the European School of Oncology for his investigations into the tobacco industry. He has a degree in zoology from the University of Oxford and has a special interest in genetics and medical science, human evolution and origins, climate change and the environment.
Wednesday 02 July 2014
Two studies published earlier this year that purported to show how it was possible to produce embryonic-like stem cells by simply adding weak acid solution to blood cells have been formally retracted by all the researchers involved.
The work, published in the journal Nature on 30 January, enjoyed headlines around the world because it opened the door to the possibility of cheap and easy stem cell "repair kits" made from a patient’s own cells.
However, within weeks of the studies being published they began to fall apart as errors were found in the figures. Parts of the descriptions were shown to be plagiarised and early attempts at reproducing the work failed.
Haruko Obokata of the Riken research centre in Japan, the lead author of the study, was found guilty of misconduct by her employers – a judgement she is contesting – while other more experienced members of the team said that they could no longer trust the results that they had signed up to.
“We apologise for the mistakes included in the article and the letter [to Nature]. These multiple errors impair the credibility of the study as a whole and we are unable to say without doubt whether the [stem cell] phenomenon is real,” the authors said in their letter of retraction.
“Ongoing studies are investigating this phenomenon afresh, but given the extensive nature of the errors currently found, we consider it appropriate to retract both papers,” they added.
Nature said it is reviewing its policies on checking scientific manuscripts before publication. “We have concluded that we and the referees could not have detected the problems that fatally undermined the papers. The referees’ rigorous reports quite rightly took on trust what was presented in the papers,” it said in an editorial.
- 1 Caitlyn Jenner car crash: Driver who died in collision sued by surviving passengers for $18.5m
- 3 Watch the Supermoon live: How to see the brightest Moon of the year tonight
- 5 The 20 toughest job interview questions in the world
Caitlyn Jenner car crash: Driver who died in collision sued by surviving passengers for $18.5m
Pictures show young Palestinian girl biting Israeli soldier trying to detain boy during West Bank protests
Celebrity Big Brother 2015: Tila Tequila kicked off show after 'describing Hitler as a good man'
Watch the Supermoon live: How to see the brightest Moon of the year tonight
Hulk Hogan wants to be Donald Trump's running mate in the US Presidential election
Climate change: 2015 will be the hottest year on record 'by a mile', experts say
'Women only' train carriages: Jeremy Corbyn unveils radical move to tackle public harassment
Black holes are a passage to another universe, says Stephen Hawking
Iain Duncan Smith 'should resign over disability benefit death figures', says Jeremy Corbyn
Stock up on canned food for stock market crash, warns former Gordon Brown adviser
Labour leadership: Jeremy Corbyn voters most likely to believe 'world is controlled by a secretive elite'
£18000 - £30000 per annum: Recruitment Genius: A Sales Executive or Senior Sal...
£40000 - £55000 per annum: Recruitment Genius: This is an exciting opportunity...
£22000 per annum: Recruitment Genius: This industry leading company produces h...
£20000 - £40000 per annum: Recruitment Genius: This IT provider for the educat...