Science

Mostly Cloudy with Showers 14° London Hi 15°C / Lo 8°C

University of the bleedin' obvious

Hold the front page! Images of bikini-clad women make men more sexist. Steve Connor reports on a new study by Princeton scientists, while Jeremy Laurance recalls the other academic work that told us what we already know

Women in bikinis turn male heads and switch off the part of the brain that curbs sexism

GETTY IMAGES

Women in bikinis turn male heads and switch off the part of the brain that curbs sexism

Scientists have demonstrated something that many women suspect and most men would admit only to themselves: pictures of scantily-clad females turn women into sexual objects in the minds of men. Feminists would no doubt see the discovery as the science of the bloody obvious, but the researchers claim the results demonstrate just how pictures of bikini-clad women affect the inner workings of the male brain.

The study found that the part of the brain that keeps in check a man's sexual hostility towards women is deactivated when he is shown images of women in bikinis. The findings also support the idea that pornographic images turn women into commodified objects in the minds of men, the researchers said.

"It is as if they are reacting to these women as if they are not fully human," said Susan Fiske, professor of psychology at Princeton University, who made the study on 21 male undergraduates using a medical scanner to analyse their brain activity. She told the American Association for the Advancement of Science in Chicago: "I wouldn't argue for censorship, but I would argue that it is important to know about the impact of the images you are showing."

The study focused on a region of the brain called the medial pre-frontal cortex, just above the eyes, which, when activated seems to damp a man's tendency to express hostile sexist thoughts about women, Professor Fiske said. Men who express the strongest sexist tendencies tend to have a less active medial cortex. It becomes decactivated in men who are the most hostile to women, but only for women in bikinis, she said.

"So basically they are particularly likely to treat these women as objects, at least that is the interpretation of the data we have so far. It is a preliminary study but it is consistent with the idea that they are responding to these photographs as if they were responding to objects rather than people."

It was "shocking" to find that the pictures of scantily clad women deactivates the medial pre-frontal cortex, Professor Fiske went on. "The only other time we've observed the deactivation of this region is when people look at pictures of homeless people and drug addicts who they really don't want to think about what's in their minds because they are put off by them."

The panel of 21 heterosexual male students were first rated in terms of their sexist attitudes to women, using answers to interview questions. Then they were placed in a brain scanner while viewing a set of images of women in bikinis, women in clothes and men in clothes. The scientists also used "sexualised" images, where the head of each semi-naked photograph was cut off so that only the torso was visible. The men were then given memory tests on what they had remembered about each image, with and without the heads.

"Heterosexual men had the best memory for the sexualised bodies of women – this is cutting-off the heads – even though they had seen the bodies for only 200 milliseconds," Professor Fiske said. The findings have wider implications for society because they show how sexualised images in the media and in advertising can dehumanise women by encouraging men to think of them in terms of objects to be acted upon, she said. "There is an avoidance-related dehumanisation or dementalising kind of response. This one is an approach-orientated response. These women are attractive, they are seen as sexually inviting.

"When you have sexualised pictures of women in the workplace, it's hard not to think of female colleague in those terms. It has a spill-over effect in how you perceive plausible women in the workplace and not treating them as agents but as independent people, and not seeing them as a means to an end."

... and other groundbreaking studies from the archive

Fake orgasms differ from real ones

Professor Gert Holstege of the University of Groningen asked women to place their head in a scanner while having an orgasm with their partner. They were then asked to fake an orgasm and the scans were compared. The result? Different parts of the brain experience real orgasms and create fake ones.

The rhythm method of contraception is unreliable

A study in the British Medical Journal concluded women can get pregnant at any time of their monthly cycle. If you want to get pregnant, there is no substitute for frequent bonking (not a conclusion the researchers reached).

Men are attracted to women who wear red

Students at the University of Rochester, New York rated a woman's attractiveness in attire of varying hues. Most women opted for red. The researchers said this suggested they associated red with sex. Surprise! Red light district, scarlet woman, lipstick, painted nails; no clues there, then.

The more fit you are the longer you will live

Researchers from Washington, US, who studied 15,000 former servicemen concluded the highly fit had half the risk of death of the least fit.

Living near a busy road increases the risk of asthma

A study of 5,000 children by the University of Southern California found air quality affected health. They said: "Living in residential areas with high traffic-related pollution significantly increases the risk of childhood asthma."

Hurrying makes people less attentive

US researchers assessed the walking speeds of randomly selected pedestrians in 31 countries using stopwatches and a complicated measures. They concluded that "the more people rush around the less time they have to devote to factors that are peripheral to their main goals".

Giving up smoking is good for your lungs

Scientists at the University of Glasgow assessed smokers six weeks after they had quit. They found that they had improved their lung function by 15 per cent. What is even more remarkable is that editors at the American Journal of Respiratory and critical Care Medicine thought this a study worth publishing.

Binge drinkers are more likely to fall over

Scientists at Wake Forest School of medicine in the US who questioned 2,000 students concluded getting drunk made them prone to lose their balance.

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

Page 1 of 2
<<[1] [2] >>
Sexist based research has sexist conclusion.
[info]kwenchin_5_5_5 wrote:
Tuesday, 17 February 2009 at 01:58 am (UTC)
Shouldn't she also have studied the effects of scantily dressed male sports jocks on female undergraduates.

Where to next?
[info]wowamused wrote:
Tuesday, 17 February 2009 at 04:20 am (UTC)
Susan Fiske's comment - "It is as if they are reacting to these women as if they are not fully human" - isis absurd. THese men are reacting ina completely normal biological fashion. I think that the next study my tax payer monies should help commision is an investigation into whether castration would help curb men's sexual attraction to woman.
Re: Where to next?
[info]ottorino wrote:
Tuesday, 17 February 2009 at 01:32 pm (UTC)
Spot on. If I have the opportunity to meet and chat with a lady I think looks a million dollars, I'll be as interested in her personality and conversation just as much as I will her obvious assets.

If all I can see is a photo of the lady, then unless there's some wonderful technology I've missed, my opportunity of discerning her personality and conversation is going to be markedly curtailed (i.e. zero). What alternative approach is there under the circumstances for a normal heterosexual male to take other than ogle her assets, which probably will not include her head?

If reporting is to be objective, then let it be so else at least be honest about it when it isn't.
Who are these new cutting age scientists?
[info]mackname wrote:
Tuesday, 17 February 2009 at 04:27 am (UTC)

By the scale of such "SCIENTIFIC" articles and researches I become more convinced that higher education system is a total waste of time and money.

Where is the scientific point there? What kind of data collection is that and, what kind of ridiculous conclusion is this?

No wonder we have a great number of useless unemployed graduates - the illiterate literates!
Re: Who are these new cutting age scientists?
[info]testing_times wrote:
Wednesday, 18 February 2009 at 10:11 am (UTC)
Hear hear!

I wonder wether heterosexual men within pre-modern tribal societies in Africa & South America, where women tend to roam naked/semi-naked most of the time, have a permanently 'deactivated medial pre-frontal cortex'? I think you'll find that in many cases women elders are highly regarded & command a great deal of respect amongst the men folk, and in some cases can even hold seniority (bare boobs or not).
the bleedin' obvious
[info]oarinput wrote:
Tuesday, 17 February 2009 at 04:33 am (UTC)
Some suggestions for further research:
1) the effect of miniskirts on the male mind
2) the effect on the male mind of women in any kind of scanty clothing
3) if not asking for "it", are scantily-clad women asking for sexual attention?
University of the bleedin' obvious
[info]x12831 wrote:
Tuesday, 17 February 2009 at 04:39 am (UTC)
Studies such as those mentioned in the report doesn't contribute 'real' knowledge. Just an excuse for the unis to awarded PhDs.
Bogus PhDs or absent-minded professors?
[info]homo_vulgariter wrote:
Tuesday, 17 February 2009 at 04:58 am (UTC)
It is a requirement for the awarding of a PhD that the research reported constitute a significant contribution to learning. So, given the amount of trash that is published in academic journals, you have to ask, were the perpetrators awarded PhDs erroneously or did they forget everything they had learned while doing their PhD after they had finished it?
No foolin'
[info]49niner wrote:
Tuesday, 17 February 2009 at 05:56 am (UTC)
Well now we know what to do in middle age to revive our flagging libido! I'd never have guessed.
Proof?
[info]stevvi wrote:
Tuesday, 17 February 2009 at 06:52 am (UTC)
"When you have sexualised pictures of women in the workplace, it's hard not to think of female colleague in those terms. It has a spill-over effect in how you perceive plausible women in the workplace and not treating them as agents but as independent people, and not seeing them as a means to an end."

Whilst I found the article interesting, is their any proof for the above comment? None appears to be given and it seems to be just stated as fact.
redundant messages
[info]mandymetameme wrote:
Tuesday, 17 February 2009 at 07:02 am (UTC)
consumer culture makes us exinct
Very useful to confirm or otherwise the bleedin' obvious
[info]richardjeff wrote:
Tuesday, 17 February 2009 at 07:11 am (UTC)
It's easy to knock "university of the bleedin' obvious" but, firstly, often things everyone knows to be true turn out, on god research, not to be the case.

Secondly, the research often reveals the mechanisms that bring the "obvious" conclusion about and so advance our ability to do something about it. Thirdly, by having a good bit of research to fall back on arguments for change can be supported with solid evidence rather than "as everyone knows".

Take the "Men are attracted to women who wear red". The research may help us understand whether it is that they are attractive in red because in signals sexual availability or that red has become the symbol of sexual availability because it makes women more attractive to men.

The Giving up smoking is medically interesting not because it found "that they had improved their lung function" but because that extra bit of information, 15% after 6 weeks; an indication of the rate of recovery that might be critical in designing treatments.

Re: Very useful to confirm or otherwise the bleedin' obvious
[info]ms444 wrote:
Tuesday, 17 February 2009 at 08:14 am (UTC)
Well said. People can be too quick to miss out potential subtleties of educational information, especially if the information starts off with a particular spin. Someone should research do a study on that, I hope newspapers would publish the findings.
Important Work
[info]jimg66 wrote:
Tuesday, 17 February 2009 at 07:17 am (UTC)
I'm eagerly awaiting the results of the research into the toilet habits of a range of woodland creatures.
redundant messages
[info]mandymetameme wrote:
Tuesday, 17 February 2009 at 07:30 am (UTC)
consumer culture makes us exinct
Future bleeding obvious
[info]zecchetti wrote:
Tuesday, 17 February 2009 at 08:09 am (UTC)
Someday humanity will realise that Islam is "the bleeding obvious". If women were to observe the hijab they would not be treated as objects for carnal pleasure for men, and thus, sexism would be eliminated.
Re: Future bleeding obvious
[info]paul999 wrote:
Tuesday, 17 February 2009 at 08:57 am (UTC)
Certainly a lot of bleeding involved with Islam.
Re: Future bleeding obvious - [info]the100thidiot - Tuesday, 17 February 2009 at 09:51 am (UTC) Expand
Re: Future bleeding obvious - [info]lineswine - Tuesday, 17 February 2009 at 09:56 am (UTC) Expand
Re: Future bleeding obvious - [info]andrea_2 - Tuesday, 17 February 2009 at 10:33 am (UTC) Expand
Re: Future bleeding obvious - [info]fulkehunke - Tuesday, 17 February 2009 at 04:59 pm (UTC) Expand
Re: Future bleeding obvious - [info]agrvtedgnostk - Tuesday, 17 February 2009 at 10:02 pm (UTC) Expand
[info]cm999 wrote:
Tuesday, 17 February 2009 at 08:14 am (UTC)
Yeah because ladies never view scantily clad men as sex objects!!!
[info]andrea_2 wrote:
Tuesday, 17 February 2009 at 11:42 am (UTC)
Oh yes they do. And a very enjoyable pastime it is too!
Too much flesh on show
[info]rohor wrote:
Tuesday, 17 February 2009 at 08:19 am (UTC)
The modern tendency for women to show as much flesh as possible turns them into 'objects' in the eyes of many men. They have lost the art of suggestion by concealment.
Research
[info]rants_a_lot wrote:
Tuesday, 17 February 2009 at 08:31 am (UTC)
I can just picture it, researcher/scientist having breakfast. "Shall I continue to find the cure for cancer today? No, I think I will see if getting drunk makes you fall over"
Courses available from......UBO
[info]sportingmac wrote:
Tuesday, 17 February 2009 at 08:41 am (UTC)
...the University of the Bleedin' Obvious. There must have been a generation gap where nothing was handed down from parent to child or maybe it was because it wasn't written down in tablets of stone by an 'expert' that we have to now study these bleedin obvious things. Worse still is that these people actually think they are doing ground breaking research. Stunning bit insight though.......
Cancer
[info]kanchenjunga wrote:
Tuesday, 17 February 2009 at 09:09 am (UTC)
A well respected medical journal published research which showed there was a high correlation between the number of lampposts and incidences of cancer.
Now thats obvious to the local council, and rocket scientists but it beggars belief for us regular folk.
women as not human
[info]mind_ful wrote:
Tuesday, 17 February 2009 at 09:09 am (UTC)
It is obvious of course. But the reason is that a person is not usually 'just a body' in our culture. If you clothe someone you immediately personalise them. having no clothes is like becomeing 'just a body' again and therefore not a person. The problem is that we live in a world where it is ok to denigrate 'just the body'. Ever since Descartes thought the mind was seperate, in fact. Ironically, exposing the body is like removing what is considered important - the mind. On the other hand, covering it up completely is an anialation of the person. women have two choices: anialation (like in religions that obscure her puplic existence ) or de-humanisaton. Great.
I hope it doesn't provide sexist men with an excuse...
[info]the_clicketeer wrote:
Tuesday, 17 February 2009 at 09:22 am (UTC)
I certainly hope that the conclusion reached from this research is not that it is womens' own fault for sexist behaviour towards them. It kind of removes the blame from sexist men, doesn't it?
Re: I hope it doesn't provide sexist men with an excuse...
[info]oarinput wrote:
Tuesday, 17 February 2009 at 05:33 pm (UTC)
Women who reveal large amounts of flesh, or flesh close to erogenous zones, or the erogenous zones, in public or private, are sending sexual signals, and bear responsibility for those signals. They are inviting sexual attention, and can have no cause for complaint if it comes to them, unless the attention is abusive.
"Commodified"? Seriously?
[info]mortysmith wrote:
Tuesday, 17 February 2009 at 10:01 am (UTC)
I had thought "objectified" was probably the low point in the corruption of language for PC ends, but no, here we have "commodified" as well. It seems I misunderestimated them.

And what is this nonsense about men feeling "sexual hostility" towards women until they are shown these kind of photos? These people talk so much about others' latent assumptions, but they never consider their own.

The fact that the professor's name is Fiske is too good to be true.
Cross cultural study
[info]rmcbride05 wrote:
Tuesday, 17 February 2009 at 10:25 am (UTC)
The interesting point that must be noted in this research was that culture is not taken as a driving factor in the views of the undergraduates under study. While we are not given full details one can surely assume that the 21 students are young white middle (to upper) class Americans as they study at Princinton (a broad generalisation, I know). So the 'bleeding obvious' is perhaps so because of the demographic under study. How many young males at university watch porn, music videos and see cheerleaders? Surely an influencing factor on their view of women in bikinnis. There is no actual explanation as to why the man's brain deactivates a certain part of their brain when they see such images, is it natural or is it socially learnt?

Also while this study while perhaps useful for understanding the physiological underpinnings of young male sexual behaviour we are not given any insight into older/younger white American males views, and more to the point how different ethnic groups and communities may view women scantly clad. The comment earlier by zecchetti regarding the hijab is a case in point. Can anyone really say that the hijab protects women from sexism, or does in fact perpuates it? Either position can be easily argueed for or against depending on the cultural milleu you descend from. Universal generalisation should be avoided in both cases.
I'm confused
[info]rapidreader2 wrote:
Tuesday, 17 February 2009 at 10:30 am (UTC)
Am I the only one who doesn't understand this garbled article?
Re: I'm confused
[info]rmcbride05 wrote:
Tuesday, 17 February 2009 at 11:27 am (UTC)
maybe because you read it too rapidly
Re: I&#39;m confused - [info]rapidreader2 - Wednesday, 18 February 2009 at 10:08 am (UTC) Expand
scanned sex
[info]alain73 wrote:
Tuesday, 17 February 2009 at 11:06 am (UTC)
Did the man have his head in the scanner too or did the researches have a supply of 4 foot tall Alfies?
Contrived
[info]justleavingnow wrote:
Tuesday, 17 February 2009 at 11:36 am (UTC)
Imagine trying to discover how the City of London finance worked by measuring the petrol and diesel deliveries into London.

A brain scan only tells what areas of a brain need energy. Not what it is doing.

A simple interpretation of this observation would be that men only imagine with clothed women. When all is on show, then why imagine! Looking at an object and analysing it is so much different to imagining what is hidden. That conclusion proves why fashion is so important.

Cutting a head off distorts a normal human body form and the brain will do everything it can to make it more normal again. As it is abnormal, the mind will take more attention to it naturally. It would have been better if they had used photoshop to put the same head on multiple bodies.

In fact by picking the controls and the tests carefully measuring energy used by areas of the brain can be made to show most requirements.
Page 1 of 2
<<[1] [2] >>

Most popular