University of the bleedin' obvious
Hold the front page! Images of bikini-clad women make men more sexist. Steve Connor reports on a new study by Princeton scientists, while Jeremy Laurance recalls the other academic work that told us what we already know
GETTY IMAGES
Women in bikinis turn male heads and switch off the part of the brain that curbs sexism
Scientists have demonstrated something that many women suspect and most men would admit only to themselves: pictures of scantily-clad females turn women into sexual objects in the minds of men. Feminists would no doubt see the discovery as the science of the bloody obvious, but the researchers claim the results demonstrate just how pictures of bikini-clad women affect the inner workings of the male brain.
The study found that the part of the brain that keeps in check a man's sexual hostility towards women is deactivated when he is shown images of women in bikinis. The findings also support the idea that pornographic images turn women into commodified objects in the minds of men, the researchers said.
"It is as if they are reacting to these women as if they are not fully human," said Susan Fiske, professor of psychology at Princeton University, who made the study on 21 male undergraduates using a medical scanner to analyse their brain activity. She told the American Association for the Advancement of Science in Chicago: "I wouldn't argue for censorship, but I would argue that it is important to know about the impact of the images you are showing."
The study focused on a region of the brain called the medial pre-frontal cortex, just above the eyes, which, when activated seems to damp a man's tendency to express hostile sexist thoughts about women, Professor Fiske said. Men who express the strongest sexist tendencies tend to have a less active medial cortex. It becomes decactivated in men who are the most hostile to women, but only for women in bikinis, she said.
"So basically they are particularly likely to treat these women as objects, at least that is the interpretation of the data we have so far. It is a preliminary study but it is consistent with the idea that they are responding to these photographs as if they were responding to objects rather than people."
It was "shocking" to find that the pictures of scantily clad women deactivates the medial pre-frontal cortex, Professor Fiske went on. "The only other time we've observed the deactivation of this region is when people look at pictures of homeless people and drug addicts who they really don't want to think about what's in their minds because they are put off by them."
The panel of 21 heterosexual male students were first rated in terms of their sexist attitudes to women, using answers to interview questions. Then they were placed in a brain scanner while viewing a set of images of women in bikinis, women in clothes and men in clothes. The scientists also used "sexualised" images, where the head of each semi-naked photograph was cut off so that only the torso was visible. The men were then given memory tests on what they had remembered about each image, with and without the heads.
"Heterosexual men had the best memory for the sexualised bodies of women – this is cutting-off the heads – even though they had seen the bodies for only 200 milliseconds," Professor Fiske said. The findings have wider implications for society because they show how sexualised images in the media and in advertising can dehumanise women by encouraging men to think of them in terms of objects to be acted upon, she said. "There is an avoidance-related dehumanisation or dementalising kind of response. This one is an approach-orientated response. These women are attractive, they are seen as sexually inviting.
"When you have sexualised pictures of women in the workplace, it's hard not to think of female colleague in those terms. It has a spill-over effect in how you perceive plausible women in the workplace and not treating them as agents but as independent people, and not seeing them as a means to an end."
... and other groundbreaking studies from the archive
Fake orgasms differ from real ones
Professor Gert Holstege of the University of Groningen asked women to place their head in a scanner while having an orgasm with their partner. They were then asked to fake an orgasm and the scans were compared. The result? Different parts of the brain experience real orgasms and create fake ones.
The rhythm method of contraception is unreliable
A study in the British Medical Journal concluded women can get pregnant at any time of their monthly cycle. If you want to get pregnant, there is no substitute for frequent bonking (not a conclusion the researchers reached).
Men are attracted to women who wear red
Students at the University of Rochester, New York rated a woman's attractiveness in attire of varying hues. Most women opted for red. The researchers said this suggested they associated red with sex. Surprise! Red light district, scarlet woman, lipstick, painted nails; no clues there, then.
The more fit you are the longer you will live
Researchers from Washington, US, who studied 15,000 former servicemen concluded the highly fit had half the risk of death of the least fit.
Living near a busy road increases the risk of asthma
A study of 5,000 children by the University of Southern California found air quality affected health. They said: "Living in residential areas with high traffic-related pollution significantly increases the risk of childhood asthma."
Hurrying makes people less attentive
US researchers assessed the walking speeds of randomly selected pedestrians in 31 countries using stopwatches and a complicated measures. They concluded that "the more people rush around the less time they have to devote to factors that are peripheral to their main goals".
Giving up smoking is good for your lungs
Scientists at the University of Glasgow assessed smokers six weeks after they had quit. They found that they had improved their lung function by 15 per cent. What is even more remarkable is that editors at the American Journal of Respiratory and critical Care Medicine thought this a study worth publishing.
Binge drinkers are more likely to fall over
Scientists at Wake Forest School of medicine in the US who questioned 2,000 students concluded getting drunk made them prone to lose their balance.
View all comments that have been posted about this article.
Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.
- Print Article
- Email Article
-
Click here for copyright permissions
Copyright 2009 Independent News and Media Limited


Comments
If all I can see is a photo of the lady, then unless there's some wonderful technology I've missed, my opportunity of discerning her personality and conversation is going to be markedly curtailed (i.e. zero). What alternative approach is there under the circumstances for a normal heterosexual male to take other than ogle her assets, which probably will not include her head?
If reporting is to be objective, then let it be so else at least be honest about it when it isn't.
By the scale of such "SCIENTIFIC" articles and researches I become more convinced that higher education system is a total waste of time and money.
Where is the scientific point there? What kind of data collection is that and, what kind of ridiculous conclusion is this?
No wonder we have a great number of useless unemployed graduates - the illiterate literates!
I wonder wether heterosexual men within pre-modern tribal societies in Africa & South America, where women tend to roam naked/semi-naked most of the time, have a permanently 'deactivated medial pre-frontal cortex'? I think you'll find that in many cases women elders are highly regarded & command a great deal of respect amongst the men folk, and in some cases can even hold seniority (bare boobs or not).
1) the effect of miniskirts on the male mind
2) the effect on the male mind of women in any kind of scanty clothing
3) if not asking for "it", are scantily-clad women asking for sexual attention?
Whilst I found the article interesting, is their any proof for the above comment? None appears to be given and it seems to be just stated as fact.
Secondly, the research often reveals the mechanisms that bring the "obvious" conclusion about and so advance our ability to do something about it. Thirdly, by having a good bit of research to fall back on arguments for change can be supported with solid evidence rather than "as everyone knows".
Take the "Men are attracted to women who wear red". The research may help us understand whether it is that they are attractive in red because in signals sexual availability or that red has become the symbol of sexual availability because it makes women more attractive to men.
The Giving up smoking is medically interesting not because it found "that they had improved their lung function" but because that extra bit of information, 15% after 6 weeks; an indication of the rate of recovery that might be critical in designing treatments.
Now thats obvious to the local council, and rocket scientists but it beggars belief for us regular folk.
And what is this nonsense about men feeling "sexual hostility" towards women until they are shown these kind of photos? These people talk so much about others' latent assumptions, but they never consider their own.
The fact that the professor's name is Fiske is too good to be true.
Also while this study while perhaps useful for understanding the physiological underpinnings of young male sexual behaviour we are not given any insight into older/younger white American males views, and more to the point how different ethnic groups and communities may view women scantly clad. The comment earlier by zecchetti regarding the hijab is a case in point. Can anyone really say that the hijab protects women from sexism, or does in fact perpuates it? Either position can be easily argueed for or against depending on the cultural milleu you descend from. Universal generalisation should be avoided in both cases.
A brain scan only tells what areas of a brain need energy. Not what it is doing.
A simple interpretation of this observation would be that men only imagine with clothed women. When all is on show, then why imagine! Looking at an object and analysing it is so much different to imagining what is hidden. That conclusion proves why fashion is so important.
Cutting a head off distorts a normal human body form and the brain will do everything it can to make it more normal again. As it is abnormal, the mind will take more attention to it naturally. It would have been better if they had used photoshop to put the same head on multiple bodies.
In fact by picking the controls and the tests carefully measuring energy used by areas of the brain can be made to show most requirements.