Thefts and losses cost Whitehall pounds 1m a year
Tuesday 09 April 1996
Related articles
Nearly pounds 5m worth of property has been lost or stolen from government departments in the last five years, including a consignment of Royal Navy rockets, computer chips and a horsebox.
New figures compiled from parliamentary answers show a four-fold increase in losses since 1991, with the value of property stolen or unaccounted for rising to at least pounds 4,941,409 this year.
Ian McCartney, Labour's employment spokesman, said he began an investigation into information technology losses after a tip off that thousands of pounds of computer equipment was missing from Whitehall.
"I believe there are criminal groups operating in or outside Whitehall," he said. "Equipment appears to be coming in the front entrance and going straight out the back door. The MoD doesn't even bother to keep records of central records on the loss of items worth less than pounds 100,000."
The Department of Health reported the theft of six items in 1991 worth pounds 7,460. In 1996, 350 items were stolen worth pounds 231,249. Serious Fraud Office equipment worth pounds 1,300 is currently "otherwise unaccounted for" and the Foreign Office reported pounds 85,000 worth of computer equipment stolen between 1994 and 1996.
Although computer technology appeared to be the biggest target for thieves, the prliamentary answers also revealed other major losses.
The Department of Trade and Industry had pounds 49,000 worth of chairs stolen, an "uninterruptable power supply" worth pounds 9,000 was stolen from the Treasury and the Home Office reported the loss of 23 heat lamps worth pounds 7,000 and a horsebox and its tools worth pounds 6,500.
The Home Office was unable to explain the circumstances surrounding the loss of the horsebox due to the unavailability of staff over the bank holiday, a spokeswoman said. The DTI were likewise unable to explain the theft of the chairs.
The Ministry of Defence said a consignment of three rockets, worth pounds 104,000, had been "lost" following the Gulf War. "We ran a six-month investigation into their whereabouts," a spokes-man said. "It was decided they were either lost en route home, or that they there were not missing at all and it was merely an accounting error."
Stressing that the rockets were not dangerous and were designed to distract other rockets from reaching their targets, the spokesman added: "We run a tight system and investigate anything lost worth more than pounds 150. However, we are a huge organisation with equipment in places as far-flung as Rwanda, Cambodia and Angola. When equipment is lost it might also be because it fell overboard during a storm."
The MoD also reported that a thermal imager worth pounds 118,000 was missing.
Mr McCartney, MP for Makerfield, Lancashire, stressed that the figures he had compiled gave only a selective view of Whitehall thefts, as they represented only the information given in parliamentary answers.
- 1 'Sickening, deluded and unforgivable': Bloody attack brings terror to capital’s streets
- 2 Mothers' diets may harm IQs in two-thirds of babies
- 3 Gay couple beaten in park urge MPs to moderate language on gay marriage
- 4 After woman sells virginity for $780,000, here are the results of our prostitution survey
- 5 Far-right French historian, 78-year-old Dominique Venner, commits suicide in Notre Dame in protest against gay marriage
Get your summer started with British Military Fitness
BMF is the UK’s biggest and best loved outdoor fitness classes
Visit York
Find out what The Independent's resident travel expert has to say about one of the most beautiful small cities in the world
Enter the latest Independent competitions
Win anything from gadgets to five-star holidays on our competitions and offers page.
Business videos from commercial thought leaders
Watch the best in the business world give their insights into the world of business.
Independent Dating
Day In a Page
Edward VIII’s phone calls - and how MI5 bugged them
How to say ‘I’m a sellout’
Why clubs are keen to take a stand






Comments