Call for age of criminal responsibility to rise
Friday 22 September 2006
Latest in Crime
On Facebook
From the blogs
Can we shop our way out of a recession?
The idea that a lot of shopping translates into a healthy economy is dubious. On the three prior oc...
How social networking made public vanity acceptable
When did it become acceptable to brag about oneself publicly?
‘French beer is unknown. We must change that’
Stereotypes die hard. ‘The Very Hungry Frenchman’, the BBC’s current television series following che...
Something for the weekend in London: February 17-19
To some, February is the month of lurrrve, to others it's the month of rain, snow and flu, but for u...
The age at which children can be brought before the courts should be raised from 10 to 14, a judicial think-tank will say today.
They will argue that the age of criminal responsibility in England and Wales - lower than in almost any other comparable countries - is disastrously counterproductive. As well as "demonising" young people, it can put them on the road to a criminal career when they are still at primary school, they believe.
Although the age of criminal responsibility has existed for decades, youth courts traditionally only convicted under-14s if the prosecution could demonstrate that the offender knew the difference between right and wrong. That safeguard was removed eight years ago.
The Centre for Crime and Justice Studies (CCJS) at King's College London, warns in a report today that the punitive "cops, courts and corrections" approach is failing to tackle the underlying reasons for children's offending behaviour.
Almost 1,000 children aged between 10 and 12 are brought before the courts each year. In one case, a 10-year-old was prosecuted for racially abusing another child in a school playground. The judge said the case was nonsense: "There must be other ways of dealing with this."
In 2004, four children aged between 10 and 12 were put in custody - all for burglary - while another 665 received community penalties.
A Home Office spokeswoman said it had no plans to raise the age of criminal responsibility: "It allows us to intervene earlier to prevent offending and to help young people develop a sense of personal responsibility for their misbehaviour."
- 1 Vatican told to pay taxes as Italy tackles budget crisis
- 2 Pete Doherty: I was a bit unhinged
- 3 Rothschild loses libel case, and reveals secret world of money and politics
- 4 Greeks rage at erosion of sovereignty while leaders haggle over deal
- 5 Swiss to launch a space 'janitor'
- 6 Energy watchdog tells big firms: cut prices or else
- 7 Hey, You've got to hide your drug away
- 1 Rothschild loses libel case, and reveals secret world of money and politics
- 2 Vatican told to pay taxes as Italy tackles budget crisis
- 3 The West Bank's Bobby Sands
- 4 Prehistoric cybermen? Sardinia's lost warriors rise from the dust
- 5 Spotify: 1 million plays, £108 return
- 6 Female teachers accused of giving boys lower marks
- 7 The artist vandalising advertising with poetry
- 8 Apple admits it has a human rights problem
- 9 Mark Steel: If religion is 'marginal', I'm the Pope
- 10 Can you master a language in a weekend?
Free trial of new Independent iPad app
Get your daily dose of the best of British journalism, sponsored by American Airlines
Amazing restaurant offers
Three glasses of free champagne and a special menu at 46 top London restaurants.
Latest Independent competitions
Win anything from gadgets to five-star holidays on our competitions and offers page.
Commercial thought leaders
Watch the best in the business world give their insights into the world of business.
Career Services
Day In a Page
Dawn of the age of wireless medicine
Pete Doherty: I was a bit unhinged
Is there such a thing as a gastronomic gender divide?
The day I danced for a place in Danny Boyle's Olympics spectacular




Comments