Cameras may be allowed in courts
Monday 13 November 2006
Latest in Crime
On Facebook
From the blogs
More than half of Afghanistan’s families live in extreme poverty
Leila is watching her baby intently, as his mouth moves trying to swallow the small blob of yellow p...
Time for a new approach to alcohol
Ambulances were called and three drunk teenagers were brought to my care. One was so drunk we had to...
Bahrain: One year on
I am used to endless lies and criticism from the BNP and its favourite blogster, as well as Islamist...
Paul Volcker stands tall against the banking lobby
Why is Europe, which likes to present itself as an opponent of speculative "Anglo-Saxon" finance, li...
Proposals on the televising of criminal trials are to be published by the Lord Chancellor within weeks.
Lord Falconer aimed to set out a "way forward" on allowing cameras into courts for the first time "before the end of the year", a spokesman said. But he remained convinced that neither witnesses, defendants nor jurors should be shown on television, the Department of Constitutional Affairs (DCA) said.
Mock television footage from a six-week pilot at the Court of Appeal in 2004 was shown to ministers and senior members of the judiciary, and a public consultation was held at the same time. A DCA spokesman said: "Lord Falconer aims to make an announcement on the way forward for broadcasting in courts before the end of the year.
"The consultation in 2004/5 provided a wide range of views. The response confirmed Lord Falconer's very firm view that witnesses, defendants and jurors should not be filmed."
Defendants' faces could be blurred unless they agreed to have their features shown, and footage could be pooled to avoid having multiple cameras in court.
The director of public prosecutions, Ken Macdonald, said last year that he had no objection to cameras being allowed to film the final sentencing stage of successful prosecutions.
- 1 Apple admits it has a human rights problem
- 2 Caught in his own blast: an Iranian targeting Israel
- 3 No secularism please, we're British
- 4 Reinstate Knox's murder charge, Italian court told
- 5 Police confiscate passport from Brooks' assistant
- 6 Lightning kills an entire football team
- 7 'Drunk tanks' and minimum prices to help Britain sober up
- 1 How Koscielny became prince of the Emirates
- 2 Apple admits it has a human rights problem
- 3 Spotify: 1 million plays, £108 return
- 4 Six Grammys, five years off: Adele puts love before career
- 5 Lightning kills an entire football team
- 6 Police confiscate passport from Brooks' assistant
- 7 Nauru and Abkhazia: One is a destitute microstate marooned in the South Pacific, the other is a disputed former Soviet Republic 13,000km away, so why are they so keen to be friends?
- 8 I was born to be a killer. Every night I see the Devil in my dreams
- 9 Mark Steel: If religion is 'marginal', I'm the Pope
- 10 Rothschild loses libel case, and reveals secret world of money and politics
Free trial of new Independent iPad app
Get your daily dose of the best of British journalism, sponsored by American Airlines
Win a three-week coastal jaunt
Spend three weeks exploring every nook and cranny of gorgeous Atlantic Canada.
Amazing restaurant offers
Three glasses of free champagne and a special menu at 46 top London restaurants.
Latest Independent competitions
Win anything from gadgets to five-star holidays on our competitions and offers page.
Commercial thought leaders
Watch the best in the business world give their insights into the world of business.
Career Services
Day In a Page
No secularism please, we're British




Comments