DVT victims' case against airlines thrown out
Friday 09 December 2005
Latest in Crime
On Facebook
From the blogs
More than half of Afghanistan’s families live in extreme poverty
Leila is watching her baby intently, as his mouth moves trying to swallow the small blob of yellow p...
Time for a new approach to alcohol
Ambulances were called and three drunk teenagers were brought to my care. One was so drunk we had to...
Bahrain: One year on
I am used to endless lies and criticism from the BNP and its favourite blogster, as well as Islamist...
Paul Volcker stands tall against the banking lobby
Why is Europe, which likes to present itself as an opponent of speculative "Anglo-Saxon" finance, li...
Victims of deep vein thrombosis lost a four-year compensation battle against airlines yesterday in a ruling that gives the travel industry legal immunity for "economy class syndrome".
The House of Lords ruled that lesser courts correctly threw out an application by passengers or their families seeking to sue two airlines, British Airways and China Airlines, for death and injury from deep vein thrombosis (DVT).
The action was a test case that could have thrown the air industry open to compensation claims for millions of pounds.
Airline passengers can develop DVT because their movement is restricted and blood clots develop, often in the legs. If the clot reaches the lungs or brain, DVT can be fatal and the condition kills between 500 and 1,000 passengers a year.
Lawyers representing eight claimants - two relatives and six survivors - claimed that the airlines were responsible for DVT under the 1929 Warsaw Convention governing air travel.
They argued that the carriers had failed to warn passengers that cramped flying conditions and long hours in the air could give rise to DVT. Consequently, they said, the breach of duty or obligation constituted an "accident".
After two months' consideration, the law lords ruled that, since there was nothing unusual in the course of the flights, the development of DVT could not be considered to involve "any ordinary or extended conception of 'accident'."
Lady Hale said that an internal reaction to an "ordinary uncomfortable journey by air", during which nothing other than that reaction took place, was not liable to compensation.
By making the ruling, the House of Lords backed the rejection of the case by the Court of Appeal in 2003, which ruled DVT could not be considered an "event". That appeal was held in response to the High Court's rejection of the case in 2002.
British Airways said the ruling meant no claims for injury or death caused by DVT during the normal operation of an aircraft could now be brought against airlines in the UK.
Sean Gates, a solicitor for the airline, said: "You can sit on your couch or in a cinema and watch War And Peace and still contract DVT. The issue is whether or not that sitting is an accident and the fact, as we see from the House of Lords, is that it isn't."
British Airways said it would continue to provide advice and information about DVT to customers through ticket wallets, the internet, on-board videos and in-flight magazines.
Des Collins, of Collins Solicitors in Watford which brought the action, said he was considering taking the case to the European Court in Strasbourg.
His firm began the case in 2001 against 26 airlines on behalf of 55 claimants. The £500,000 of legal fees for the eight remaining claimants were funded through legal provisions of their household insurance.
One of the cases was brought by Timothy Stuart, the partner of Emma Christofferson, who died after flying the London to Melbourne route on BA and Qantas in 2000.
Mr Collins said: "The judgment has in effect provided a blanket immunity for civil suits against the industry in relation to DVT. It's regrettable that they should have sought to have obtained that immunity."
John Smith MP, an aviation health campaigner, vowed to redouble his efforts to bring about a change in the law. "We believe the law lords missed an opportunity to apply some common sense by bringing airlines in line with other passenger carriers."
The Labour MP for Vale of Glamorgan intended to table a motion in Parliament calling on the Government to bring in legislation placing a duty of care on airlines for the health of passengers.
- 1 No secularism please, we're British
- 2 Apple admits it has a human rights problem
- 3 'Drunk tanks' and minimum prices to help Britain sober up
- 4 Working as a jail torturer ruined my life
- 5 Lightning kills an entire football team
- 6 Reinstate Knox's murder charge, Italian court told
- 7 Caught in his own blast: an Iranian targeting Israel
- 1 Spotify: 1 million plays, £108 return
- 2 How Koscielny became prince of the Emirates
- 3 Apple admits it has a human rights problem
- 4 Mark Steel: If religion is 'marginal', I'm the Pope
- 5 No secularism please, we're British
- 6 Lightning kills an entire football team
- 7 Matthew Norman: There's always the Human Rights Act, Trevor
- 8 Special report: The hungry generation
- 9 I was born to be a killer. Every night I see the Devil in my dreams
- 10 Six Grammys, five years off: Adele puts love before career
Free trial of new Independent iPad app
Get your daily dose of the best of British journalism, sponsored by American Airlines
Win a three-week coastal jaunt
Spend three weeks exploring every nook and cranny of gorgeous Atlantic Canada.
Amazing restaurant offers
Three glasses of free champagne and a special menu at 46 top London restaurants.
Latest Independent competitions
Win anything from gadgets to five-star holidays on our competitions and offers page.
Commercial thought leaders
Watch the best in the business world give their insights into the world of business.
Career Services
Day In a Page
No secularism please, we're British




Comments