Fresh call to review Hanratty case
The family of James Hanratty, who was hanged for the A6 murder nearly 50 years ago, are calling for the case to be reviewed again.
Hanratty, a small-time thief, was found guilty in 1962 of murdering scientist Michael Gregsten and shooting his mistress Valerie Storie.
The 25-year-old was hanged two months later for the crime but his family have always protested his innocence.
An appeal eight years ago linked Hanratty's DNA to evidence taken from the scene of the 1961 murder in Dorney Reach, Buckinghamshire. But his family say it could have been contaminated and want the Criminal Cases Review Commission to order a fresh review of the evidence.
Hanratty's brother Michael told BBC Radio 4's Today programme: "We are talking about a crime scene sample being in the same folder as all Jimmy's fibres, blood samples, hairs - all in the same folder."
Mr Hanratty's brother added: "Jimmy didn't do that (murder Mr Gregsten). I can assure you that, 100%, 120%. He never hurt a soul.
"The day before the execution, his last words were 'Mick, I am completely innocent. Look after mum and dad. Keep an eye on the newspapers, this in years to come will come out'.
"Now he would never have said that. It would have been easier to say nothing and just go."
The case is being supported by former Private Eye editor Richard Ingrams, who investigated the case with journalist Paul Foot.
Mr Ingrams, now at the helm at The Oldie magazine, was this morning's guest editor of Today. He said he thought it was a "basic case of injustice".
Mr Ingrams said: "It is one of those murder stories that is rather fascinating because it is such an improbable story but I lived with it for many years at Private Eye."
Sir Geoffrey Bindman, the family's solicitor, said DNA testing was not always reliable.
He said: "There's a difference between whether DNA is infallible and reliable and what the evidence is that the particular substance from which the DNA was taken is linked to the crime.
"That's where the doubts arise and they can arise from different ways if the DNA isn't tested properly - the tests maybe defective, there may be contamination. There are a number of ways you can undermine DNA evidence."
Exclusive: 'Putin's Russia has been my biggest regret,' says Nato's outgoing Secretary General
The Osborne Ultimatum: Chancellor’s benefits freeze bombshell will affect ten million households
There’s no excuse for Dave Lee Travis’s behaviour, but we need to keep a sense of proportion
Should gay sex be illegal? 16% of Britons think so
Mark Reckless becomes second Tory MP to defect to Ukip in a month
Benefits 'smart cards' plan revealed by Iain Duncan Smith to stop claimants spending welfare money on alcohol
- 1 Snoop Dogg and Jared Leto buy a stake in Reddit as A-list invests $50m
- 2 Prince held a Facebook Q&A and this is the only question he answered
- 4 Now we know whose fault it is if you end up being murdered in Thailand
- 5 35,000 walrus gather ashore on north-west Alaska beach 'for a rest'
- < Previous
- Next >