Hard-line anti-drugs plans to hit dealers
Sunday 24 February 2008
Latest in Crime
On Facebook
From the blogs
More than half of Afghanistan’s families live in extreme poverty
Leila is watching her baby intently, as his mouth moves trying to swallow the small blob of yellow p...
Time for a new approach to alcohol
Ambulances were called and three drunk teenagers were brought to my care. One was so drunk we had to...
Bahrain: One year on
I am used to endless lies and criticism from the BNP and its favourite blogster, as well as Islamist...
Paul Volcker stands tall against the banking lobby
Why is Europe, which likes to present itself as an opponent of speculative "Anglo-Saxon" finance, li...
Suspected drug barons face having almost all of their property seized by police – down to the rings on their fingers – before they are charged with any offence, under a dramatic anti-drugs strategy to be unveiled by ministers this week.
The Home Secretary Jacqui Smith will target drug dealers with new powers designed to attack the profitability of their illicit trade. The move is certain to face criticism from civil rights advocates.
The 10-year Drug Strategy will give police and other enforcement agencies the right to seize dealers' assets once they have been arrested in connection with inquiries. A Home Office spokesman last night explained that the hard-line proposals would "send a blunt warning to criminals that we will not allow them to benefit from their crimes", as part of a campaign to double the value of seized assets to £250m a year by 2009-2010.
Currently police have the powers to seize cash, but they must obtain judicial restraining orders designed to prevent criminals disposing of their assets after their arrest.
The changes, modelled on existing powers to freeze the assets of suspected terrorists, include plans for a judge to rule on whether there are "reasonable grounds" to seize possessions pending a conviction. The Home Office plans to hold seized goods until suspects are convicted, and then sell them off.
David Davis, the shadow Home Secretary, queried the move. "The first question is what happens if no conviction is obtained? Will the taxpayer have to fund a massive lawsuit?
- 1 No secularism please, we're British
- 2 Apple admits it has a human rights problem
- 3 'Drunk tanks' and minimum prices to help Britain sober up
- 4 Working as a jail torturer ruined my life
- 5 Lightning kills an entire football team
- 6 Reinstate Knox's murder charge, Italian court told
- 7 Caught in his own blast: an Iranian targeting Israel
- 1 Spotify: 1 million plays, £108 return
- 2 How Koscielny became prince of the Emirates
- 3 Apple admits it has a human rights problem
- 4 Mark Steel: If religion is 'marginal', I'm the Pope
- 5 No secularism please, we're British
- 6 Lightning kills an entire football team
- 7 Matthew Norman: There's always the Human Rights Act, Trevor
- 8 Special report: The hungry generation
- 9 I was born to be a killer. Every night I see the Devil in my dreams
- 10 Six Grammys, five years off: Adele puts love before career
Free trial of new Independent iPad app
Get your daily dose of the best of British journalism, sponsored by American Airlines
Win a three-week coastal jaunt
Spend three weeks exploring every nook and cranny of gorgeous Atlantic Canada.
Amazing restaurant offers
Three glasses of free champagne and a special menu at 46 top London restaurants.
Latest Independent competitions
Win anything from gadgets to five-star holidays on our competitions and offers page.
Commercial thought leaders
Watch the best in the business world give their insights into the world of business.
Career Services
Day In a Page
No secularism please, we're British




Comments