Men jailed for robbing student during riots freed after error
From the blogs
David Prior's very personal reason for thinkg that investigators need appropriate expertise
Dozens of empty homes in two of Liverpool’s most deprived areas will be brought back into use thanks...
As a reluctant vegetarian (so reluctant that I'm not vegetarian at all) and a reluctant risotto eate...
Time for the monthly treat from David Hayes, who writes about British politics for the Australian In...
Two men convicted of robbing a Malaysian student during the London riots in August last year have had their convictions overturned after the Court of Appeal “disagreed” with a judge’s decision to allow testimony from anonymous witnesses at their original trial.
The attack on Ashraf Rossli caused widespread outrage after being recorded on a mobile phone video camera, and came to symbolise the UK-wide disturbances.
The video uploaded on to YouTube showed Mr Rossli, 20, being helped up by two men posing as Good Samartians on 8 August in Barking, east London, after the accountancy student had had his jaw shattered by another rioter as he cycled near the Queen’s Road flyover. But the men were then recorded going through the dazed student’s bag and taking a games console and games.
John Kassongs Kafunda, 23, and Reece Donovan, 25, were both arrested shortly afterwards. At Wood Green Crown Court in March, Mr Kafunda was jailed for four years and three months for robbery and violent disorder despite telling police he was “a million per cent sure” the person on the video was not him. “You’re sending an innocent man down,” he said as he left the court. Mr Donovan was jailed for five years for robbery, violent disorder and burglary.
But today they both saw their convictions overturned by the Court of Appeal.
The pair had been convicted on the basis of anonymous witness evidence allowed by the judge at the time. The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) said the convictions had been quashed because the Appeal Court judges disagreed with the “judge’s original call” to accept anonymous testimony, which can only be granted in particular circumstances.
A CPS spokesman said: “Victims and witnesses are at the heart of the Criminal Justice System and it is important that they have the support necessary to enable them to give their best evidence at court.
“Where it is necessary to protect the identification of a witness we can in certain circumstances apply to the court for witness anonymity.
“Our application for witness anonymity for two witnesses in this trial was allowed by the judge. Without anonymity being given, these witnesses would not have given evidence.
“The Court of Appeal has quashed these convictions as a result of allowing this application.”
The CPS said it would not be seeking a retrial.
- 1 Serena Williams apologises after comment that rape victim 'shouldn't have put herself in that position'
- 2 Disability campaigners celebrate 'victory' after government rethink over plans to make it more difficult to claim disability benefits
- 3 Bankers could face jail after report urges the Government to introduce new criminal offence for reckless management
- 4 Breaking the Silence: In the reality of occupation, there are no Palestinian civilians – only potential terrorists
- 5 We never knew Nigella Lawson - and we still don’t
Stand by for another DECADE of wet summers, say Met Office meteorologists
Serena Williams apologises after comment that rape victim 'shouldn't have put herself in that position'
Bankers could face jail after report urges the Government to introduce new criminal offence for reckless management
Feat of engineering: Incredible photographs show construction beneath New York's Second Avenue
World news in pictures