Met chief under fire for taping phone calls with Attorney General
Monday 13 March 2006
Latest in Crime
On Facebook
From the blogs
More than half of Afghanistan’s families live in extreme poverty
Leila is watching her baby intently, as his mouth moves trying to swallow the small blob of yellow p...
Time for a new approach to alcohol
Ambulances were called and three drunk teenagers were brought to my care. One was so drunk we had to...
Bahrain: One year on
I am used to endless lies and criticism from the BNP and its favourite blogster, as well as Islamist...
Paul Volcker stands tall against the banking lobby
Why is Europe, which likes to present itself as an opponent of speculative "Anglo-Saxon" finance, li...
Sir Ian Blair, the Metropolitan Police Commissioner, has provoked Government anger after being caught secretly taping a private telephone conversation with the Attorney General.
Lord Goldsmith was incensed over the breach of trust which, coincidentally, came as the men discussed whether the law could be changed to enable the use of bugged telephone calls in court cases. Sir Ian has also infuriated the Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC) by covertly recording conversations with three officials investigating the accidental shooting of Brazilian Jean Charles de Menezes.
The disclosures will renew the pressure on Sir Ian, who recently faced demands to resign over comments he made about the Soham murders. They also threaten to undermine the relationship between the Commissioner and ministers, who have previously leapt to his defence.
Sir Ian secretly taped the conversation with Lord Goldsmith in the early autumn, when they discussed the merits of changing the law to allow the intercept material to be admissible in terrorist prosecutions.
A Whitehall source said: "The Attorney General is very cross and really rather disappointed that the conversation was recorded without his knowledge or permission. It's ironic given the subject being discussed."
Lord Goldsmith will demand an apology for the intrusion from Sir Ian, who is currently on a skiing holiday. The taping emerged following the disclosure that Sir Ian also secretly recorded conversations with three IPCC officials, including its chairman Nick Hardwick. Mr Hardwick is said to be livid over the intrusion and to have protested to Charles Clarke, the Home Secretary. It was reported last night that the conversation with Mr Hardwick took place on 22 July last year, in the hours after the shooting of Mr de Menezes.
The two were said to have argued over whether an independent examination of the death should take place. A Metropolitan Police Service spokesman last night would not comment on the allegation.
The recordings came to light when IPCC investigators examined an "audit trail" of who Sir Ian spoke to after Mr de Menezes was killed. It is not a criminal offence to record a telephone conversation providing the recording is for individual use. But the person could be entitled to pursue a civil case in courts if the recording is passed on to a third party without his or her consent.
A meeting will take place today between members of the Metropolitan Police Authority, the body responsible for disciplining officers, and officers at Scotland Yard. A spokeswoman for the authority refused to reveal who would be in attendance.
A Met spokesman said no attempt had ever been made to conceal the existence of the tapes from the IPCC. An IPCC spokesman said: 'We are surprised about the recording of calls and we have the recordings. We are dealing with this issue."
There was speculation last night that Sir Ian had also recorded conversations with Sir John Gieve, who at the time was the most senior civil servant at the Home Office. Sir Ian provoked controversy two months ago when he accused the media of "institutional racism" and questioned why the Soham murders had become such a big story.
The comments led to calls from Conservative MPs for him to be sacked and reports that the Home Office had advised him to take a lower public profile.
Publicly Mr Clarke has expressed his full confidence in the Commissioner. Last night the Home Office said it would not comment on the allegations.
- 1 Ninety gaffes in ninety years
- 2 Cameron's 'drunk tanks' are dangerous, say police
- 3 Can you master a language in a weekend?
- 4 Rothschild loses libel case, and reveals secret world of money and politics
- 5 No secularism please, we're British
- 6 Apple admits it has a human rights problem
- 7 Russian youth group outlives its usefulness
- 1 Ninety gaffes in ninety years
- 2 Spotify: 1 million plays, £108 return
- 3 Apple admits it has a human rights problem
- 4 Rangers future could be bright says administrator
- 5 Rothschild loses libel case, and reveals secret world of money and politics
- 6 MP faces charges over Nazi stag night
- 7 Six Grammys, five years off: Adele puts love before career
- 8 No secularism please, we're British
- 9 Mark Steel: If religion is 'marginal', I'm the Pope
- 10 Lightning kills an entire football team
Free trial of new Independent iPad app
Get your daily dose of the best of British journalism, sponsored by American Airlines
Win a three-week coastal jaunt
Spend three weeks exploring every nook and cranny of gorgeous Atlantic Canada.
Amazing restaurant offers
Three glasses of free champagne and a special menu at 46 top London restaurants.
Latest Independent competitions
Win anything from gadgets to five-star holidays on our competitions and offers page.
Commercial thought leaders
Watch the best in the business world give their insights into the world of business.
Career Services
Day In a Page
How an abortion divided America
Did they all live happily ever after? That's up to you...




Comments