MoD reaches deal on nerve gas death
Tuesday 14 February 2006
Latest in Crime
On Facebook
From the blogs
More than half of Afghanistan’s families live in extreme poverty
Leila is watching her baby intently, as his mouth moves trying to swallow the small blob of yellow p...
Time for a new approach to alcohol
Ambulances were called and three drunk teenagers were brought to my care. One was so drunk we had to...
Bahrain: One year on
I am used to endless lies and criticism from the BNP and its favourite blogster, as well as Islamist...
Paul Volcker stands tall against the banking lobby
Why is Europe, which likes to present itself as an opponent of speculative "Anglo-Saxon" finance, li...
The Ministry of Defence has acknowledged that an RAF serviceman was unlawfully killed because of gross negligence when he was subjected to lethal nerve gas tests more than 50 years ago.
But in a compromise deal which infuriated veterans, the Government successfully argued that there was "insufficient evidence" that consent to take part in the experiment was not received. The row centres on the fate of Leading Aircraftsman Ronald Maddison, who died aged 20 after having droplets of sarin dabbed on to his arm in secret nerve gas experiments at Porton Down chemical warfare testing facility in Wiltshire in May 1953.
While his family insist Mr Maddison was tricked into participating in the tests believing they were "harmless experiments" into a cure for the cold, the Government has maintained he gave informed consent.
An inquest 15 months ago returned a verdict of "unlawful killing" and yesterday the MoD was due to challenge the inquest jury's decision before the High Court but - in an "important concession" - reached a settlement after agreeing to accept the verdict on the basis that Mr Maddison from Consett, Co Durham, had died as a result of "gross negligence" in respect of the "conduct and planning" of the experiment.
However, it only did so on the understanding that the verdict was altered to remove the finding that Mr Maddison was the victim of "unlawful act manslaughter" because of a failure to obtain consent.
After the hearing, Ken Earl of the Porton Down Veterans' Support Group said he was disappointed by the court's decision to vary the verdict. He added: "I was duped. Most of us were duped. Nobody was told before we went to Porton Down what was going on."
- 1 No secularism please, we're British
- 2 Apple admits it has a human rights problem
- 3 'Drunk tanks' and minimum prices to help Britain sober up
- 4 Working as a jail torturer ruined my life
- 5 Lightning kills an entire football team
- 6 Reinstate Knox's murder charge, Italian court told
- 7 Caught in his own blast: an Iranian targeting Israel
- 1 Spotify: 1 million plays, £108 return
- 2 How Koscielny became prince of the Emirates
- 3 Apple admits it has a human rights problem
- 4 Mark Steel: If religion is 'marginal', I'm the Pope
- 5 No secularism please, we're British
- 6 Lightning kills an entire football team
- 7 Matthew Norman: There's always the Human Rights Act, Trevor
- 8 Special report: The hungry generation
- 9 I was born to be a killer. Every night I see the Devil in my dreams
- 10 Six Grammys, five years off: Adele puts love before career
Free trial of new Independent iPad app
Get your daily dose of the best of British journalism, sponsored by American Airlines
Win a three-week coastal jaunt
Spend three weeks exploring every nook and cranny of gorgeous Atlantic Canada.
Amazing restaurant offers
Three glasses of free champagne and a special menu at 46 top London restaurants.
Latest Independent competitions
Win anything from gadgets to five-star holidays on our competitions and offers page.
Commercial thought leaders
Watch the best in the business world give their insights into the world of business.
Career Services
Day In a Page
How an abortion divided America
Did they all live happily ever after? That's up to you...




Comments