Northern Ireland police sued over 'collusion' in shooting
Belfast-born David McKittrick has been reporting on Northern Ireland since 1971, He has written for the East Antrim Times, the Irish Times and was The Independent's Irish correspondent for many years. He is the author of several books including Making Sense of the Troubles (2000) and Lost Lives (1999).
Monday 15 October 2012
Relatives of six men killed in an attack by loyalists on a Catholic bar in Northern Ireland eighteen years ago are pursuing legal action alleging state collusion in the incident.
Families say they suspect that at least one of the loyalist gunmen who attacked a small rural bar in Co Down was an informer, claiming that he was protected during the police investigation into the incident.
Although there were a number of arrests in the aftermath, no charges were brought in relation to it.
An official report into the investigation found insufficient evidence of security force collusion with the loyalist gunmen. Police Ombudsman Al Hutchinson's report concluded however that there had been failings in the investigation, describing the destruction by police of a car used in the attack as inappropriate.
Six men died and five were injured in the attack which was carried out by the Ulster Volunteer Force. The victims were watching a football match on television when the gunmen burst in, spraying the bar with gunfire.
The UVF said they it had been carried out in retaliation for a republican shooting in Belfast in which three men died.
Relatives are seeking to have the Ombudsman's findings quashed. According to their legal representative his findings were "timid, mild and meek." He added: "The Ombudsman has performed factual gymnastics to ensure there was no evidence of collusion in his conclusion."
At least one previous report from the Ombudsman's office on a separate case concluded that a police agent who had been involved in a number of loyalist murders in Belfast had been protected from prosecution by the Special Branch.
This previous conclusion, which caused a considerable stir, led to the widespread belief that agents were in effect allowed to carry out killings and other serious offences while on the payroll of the security forces.
Loughinisland families also suspect that weapons used in the attack were among a shipment brought into Northern Ireland seven years before the attack. Allegations that security force elements were involved in increasing the size of loyalist armouries stretch back to the early 1990s.
In civil actions taken by the families a claim against the Ministry of Defence alleges that the army had knowledge of the shipment and helped facilitate it. The police are accused of closing off investigative opportunities and "the destruction of vital evidence."
An initial decision to deny legal aid to the relatives has been quashed, a judge ordering that it should be reconsidered by a fresh panel.
Rochester by-election: Ukip gains second MP as Tory defector Mark Reckless holds seat
'Beast of Bolsover' Dennis Skinner takes Ukip MP Mark Reckless to task moments after he is sworn in
Rochester by-election: Labour MP Emily Thornberry resigns after posting white van and England flags tweet
The young are the new poor: Sharp increase in number of under-25s living in poverty, while over-65s are better off than ever
Revealed: How the world gets rich – from privatising British public services
Exclusive: UK approved £7m Israeli arms sales in six months before Gaza conflict
- 1 Tamir Rice: 12-year-old boy playing with fake gun dies after being shot by Ohio police
- 2 To help fuel their propaganda machine against the poor, our government has now decided to redefine the word 'welfare'
- 3 Bill Cosby: Isn’t it obvious why his accusers have stayed silent up until now?
- 4 Halle Berry takes ex-boyfriend Gabriel Aubry to court for allegedly trying to make daughter look less African-American
- 5 Isis propaganda image showing 'abuse of Muslim woman by soldiers' is actually taken from Hungarian porn film