Social worker filmed up women's skirts
Thursday 19 November 2009
Latest in Crime
On Facebook
From the blogs
Bahrain: One year on
I am used to endless lies and criticism from the BNP and its favourite blogster, as well as Islamist...
HIV orphans in Thailand prepare for the future
In Baan Gerda, a community for HIV infected or affected youngsters in Northern Thailand, a group of ...
Online House Hunter: England’s most romantic places
Our Online House Hunter goes in search of romance this Valentine's Day...
Roy Hodgson for England: A club of one
To argue against Harry Redknapp for England is akin to arguing in favour of bankers bonuses. While s...
A social worker who filmed up women's skirts during shopping trips for his own "personal gratification" was removed from the register today.
Michael Bird, 55, admitted using a digital camera hidden in a sports bag to capture images of the unsuspecting females while visiting supermarkets and clothing stores in Newcastle.
A General Social Care Council (GSCC) conduct hearing in central London was told Bird worked as a senior social worker in North Tyneside Council's emergency duty team at the time of carrying out the offences on four separate occasions in June 2008.
The panel heard how Bird was arrested on June 25 of that year by Northumbria Police, interviewed and later received a caution for voyeurism after admitting using observing equipment in a department store just before being detained.
Bird, of Newcastle, told officers he had used a tennis racquet bag to conceal a digital camera taping down the record button.
He had adapted the equipment further by putting a piece of fabric over the camera lens to create the illusion the item of clothing was sticking out of the bag.
Nirupar Uddin, presenting for the GSCC, said Bird had "adapted the tennis racquet bag in order to view under adult females' skirts and that those images caught were for his own personal sexual gratification".
It was alleged Bird used his hidden camera to film up women's skirts on June 24 at Tesco in Kingston Park and Sainsbury's in Gosforth High Street.
He was also alleged to have captured footage in the same manner on June 25 at River Island in Eldon Square and lastly Fenwick department store.
Police found some images from June 24 had been edited and placed on his home computer and immediately alerted his employer.
The recovered images made reference to women's upper thighs, bottoms and partially covered genitalia.
When asked about his arrest, Bird initially told managers he had been involved in a fight but was then forced to come clean, stating he "did not know what had come over him".
He was suspended from his post on 26 June.
Bird later said he had been showing his son how to use a video camera for a school project and had previously seen videos on the internet, causing him to become "curious".
He added he had been brought up as a Jehovah's Witness and prevented from testing the boundaries as a result of his religion.
Ms Uddin told the hearing's panel the offences breached the codes of practice relating to social care workers, namely that individuals must strive to establish and maintain trust and confidence in service users and carers.
They must also uphold public trust and confidence in social care services by not behaving in a way which would call into question an individual's suitability to work in the sector.
Bird, who was not present for the hearing, has admitted misconduct.
Hearing the facts of the case, committee chairwoman Tricia Bradbury said: "Such behaviour was a violation of the privacy of those women, who doubtless would have been horrified to learn they had been filmed in such a way."
After retiring to consider appropriate sanctions, she said the committee had concluded to remove Bird from the register "with immediate effect" following his formal dismissal from work on August 18 2008.
She said: "There was clearly an element of premeditation, planning and sophistication involved.
"The camera had to be placed in such a way that it could not be seen but still operated."
She said the committee had taken into account Bird's positive references and his 25 years' service in the profession, but found this was a "serious incident of misconduct" and a "serious departure" from the relevant code of practice.
- 1 Apple admits it has a human rights problem
- 2 Lightning kills an entire football team
- 3 Now The Sun tries to call in its favours from Downing Street
- 4 I was born to be a killer. Every night I see the Devil in my dreams
- 5 Amanda Knox set to break her silence – and pocket a fortune from book deal
- 6 Israel blames Iran for embassy bomb attacks
- 7 BBC to issue global apology for documentaries that broke rules
- 1 Spotify: 1 million plays, £108 return
- 2 Apple admits it has a human rights problem
- 3 Kate Allen: It's time for America to put an end to this shameful scandal
- 4 Lightning kills an entire football team
- 5 I was born to be a killer. Every night I see the Devil in my dreams
- 6 Now The Sun tries to call in its favours from Downing Street
- 7 BBC to issue global apology for documentaries that broke rules
- 8 Mona Lisa's 'twin sister' is discovered – 500 years late
- 9 Rhodri Marsden: What we like and what we don't like are often closer than you'd think
- 10 Modern lovers: The 'sexual body warriors' and pioneers transforming 21st-century relationships
Free trial of new Independent iPad app
Get your daily dose of the best of British journalism, sponsored by American Airlines
Win a three-week coastal jaunt
Spend three weeks exploring every nook and cranny of gorgeous Atlantic Canada.
Amazing restaurant offers
Three glasses of free champagne and a special menu at 46 top London restaurants.
Latest Independent competitions
Win anything from gadgets to five-star holidays on our competitions and offers page.
Commercial thought leaders
Watch the best in the business world give their insights into the world of business.
Career Services
Day In a Page
Apple admits it has a human rights problem
James Lawton: AVB looks all at sea
Procrastination: Not now – I'm busy
Silent revolution at the Baftas
The diva who had – and lost – it all




Comments