Woolf vows he will hold ministers to account when he sits as judge in Lords
The Lord Chief Justice has said that he plans to sit as a judge in the House of Lords where he will hear cases in the country's most important court.
His decision will alarm ministers, who are expecting to have to defend their controversial anti-terror measures in a legal challenge brought to the House of Lords later this year.
In his first interview since announcing his retirement as the country's most senior judge earlier this year, Lord Woolf, 73, says that he is intending to take his place in the House of Lords, where he can be called upon to serve as one of the law lords.
He also says he will exercise his right to take part in debates in the upper chamber, where his presence will be a focal point for any opposition to the Government's anti-terror and criminal justice reforms.
By the time Lord Woolf retires, lawyers for some of the foreign terror suspects, who were arrested and returned to prison this month, are expected to mount a legal challenge to the men's detention.
In December last year the law lords ruled against the Government on indefinite detention without trial, prompting the Home Secretary, Charles Clarke, to recast his anti-terror plans.
The possibility of Lord Woolf joining a panel of judges to rule on the lawfulness of these new measures will worry Mr Clarke and the Prime Minister.
Tony Blair has tried to warn off judges by telling them that the "rules have changed" since the London bombings and that the Government will not tolerate what Mr Blair considers to be judicial interference.
But speaking in Young Bar Magazine this week, Lord Woolf, a defender of the judiciary's independence, says that he has always spoken out if he believes that ministers are threatening the rule of law.
Recalling his ruling last year against the Government's attempts to restrict asylum-seekers' access to the courts, Lord Woolf says: "The decision caused me intense concern because it was an indication that the Government of the day was prepared to tolerate a denial of the rule of law and it was made knowing it would give rise to the danger of constitutional conflict between the government and the judiciary."
Conflict now seems inevitable. The Government has promised to introduce a law that reminds judges hearing certain terror cases that they have a duty to balance any threat to national security against the risk of a foreign terror suspect facing torture if he is forcibly returned home.
Diving in at the deep end is no excuse for shirking the style stakes
Instagram of US airport security chiefs: Lipstick knives and IED training kits among items seized
Game of Thrones author George RR Martin says 'f*** you' to fans who fear he will die before finishing Westeros saga
Loom bands: Bids for dress made from colourful rubber reach almost £154,000 on eBay
Israel-Gaza crisis: Eight killed in Gaza Strip cafe while watching World Cup semi-final
Supermoon 2014: When and why will the moon look bigger and brighter this summer?
Sustained immigration has not harmed Britons' employment, say government advisers
Australia facing international condemnation after turning around Sri Lankans at sea
7/7 memorial defaced on anniversary of 2005 attacks with ‘Blair lied thousands died’ graffiti
Even when it brutalises one of its own teenage citizens, America is helpless against Israel
Socialist Worker called to apologise over ‘vile’ article saying Eton schoolboy Horatio Chapple's death is ‘reason to save the polar bears’
There’s a nasty smell in the political air – and it’s coming from the Tories
- 2 PornHub begs users to stop uploading video clips of Brazil getting beaten 7-1
- 3 Why I'm on the brink of burning my Israeli passport
- 4 L'Oreal cuts ties with Belgium supporter Axelle Despiegelaere after hunting trip photographs
- 5 The true Gaza back-story that the Israelis aren’t telling this week