Doctors reject right to choose babies' gender: The BMA in Torquay decides sex selection on social or legal grounds is unethical
The British Medical Association, meeting in Torquay, decided that sex selection on social or religious grounds was unethical and likely to aggravate problems of sexual discrimination. The decision, the leadership's first defeat, is bound to influence the forthcoming recommendations of the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority on sex selection. The HFEA is expected to report to the Government later this year on whether couples planning a family should be allowed routinely to opt for a boy or a girl.
At present, these relatively new techniques are unregulated and lack scientific validation, but one north London clinic has already begun offering services to couples.
In the light of yesterday's vote by rank-and-file doctors, the BMA's ethics committee will have to revise its advice to the HFEA, the statutory regulator of assisted conception services. It will urge the authority to bring in legal safeguards to ensure that sex selection, which can take place before or after conception, should only be allowed for sound medical reasons - where there are clear risks of a child being born with a sex-related genetic defect.
A study of the first sex-selection clinics to open in America, Asia and Europe, highlighted in this week's British Medical Journal, found that 236 couples chose to have boys, while only 15 picked girls.
In yesterday's BMA debate, Angela Thomas, from Lothian, warned that sanctioning gender selection could lead to an unhealthy shift in public attitudes. She added: 'What if they get it wrong, and a boy is born instead of the girl that the couple wanted? That child will feel it is the wrong sex and that it is not loved.' Robin Davies, a member of the BMA's consultants' committee, said: 'This is an example of positive eugenics. When governments do this, we tremble, and when individuals do it we should too.'
But Stuart Horner, chairman of the association's ethics committee, said that he did not object to the notion of a couple undergoing infertility treatment choosing whether to have a male or female embryo implanted in the woman's womb. 'I am as opposed to discrimination as anyone else. That needs to be addressed in political and educational frameworks. It does not have to be addressed in ethics.'
He was supported by Dr Jeremy Lee-Potter, chairman of the BMA council, who declared: 'We should come down on the side of patient choice and autonomy.'
Earlier, the BMA reasserted its long-standing opposition to euthanasia, despite some grassroots calls for its legalisation. Most doctors felt that pain-relief treatments were sufficiently widespread and effective to ensure terminally-ill patients no longer had to endure pain as they died.
Brian Hopkinson, a hospital consultant from Nottingham, warned that legalising euthanasia amounted to giving the medical profession a 'licence to kill', which would wreck the trust between a doctor and vulnerable patients. 'If the state wants to be rid of the demented, the frail and the mentally sick, because their care involves too much time, trouble and taxes, let it hire professional executioners - not cloak it under spurious medical respectability.'
However, the association reasserted its support for advanced directives, so-called 'living wills', in which patients may instruct doctors to withdraw treatment under specified conditions.
- 1 Jennifer Lawrence scores first UK top 40 single with Hunger Games track 'The Hanging Tree'
- 2 Shia LaBeouf claims he was raped during #IAMSORRY art installation performance
- 4 Scientists predict green energy revolution after incredible new graphene discoveries
Kim Jong-un 'in dire need of allies' within his own government as younger sister appointed to senior role
Black Friday UK: The shops hit by chaos and violence as shopping frenzy sweeps country
Scientists predict green energy revolution after incredible new graphene discoveries
Russell Brand: 'Katy Perry? I don’t know who that is'
Michael Buerk wishes he killed Jimmy Savile when he had the chance - by pushing him overboard a cruise ship
Obama: The only people with the right to object to immigration are Native Americans
Ukip says babies born to immigrants in the UK should be classed as migrants – which would include Nigel Farage’s own children
The young are the new poor: Sharp increase in number of under-25s living in poverty, while over-65s are better off than ever
Ukip mocked after mistaking Westminster Cathedral – for a mosque
Tamir Rice: 12-year-old boy playing with fake gun dies after being shot by Ohio police
David Cameron sets out immigration reforms: We should distrust Ukip and their 'snake-oil of simple solutions'
£40k - 45k per year + Benefits: Opilio Recruitment: A fantastic opportunity ...
£30k - 35k per year + Benefits: Opilio Recruitment: We’re currently re...
£35k - 45k per year + benefits: Opilio Recruitment: A fantastic opportunity ...
£60k - 80k per year + Benefits: Opilio Recruitment: A fantastic opportunity ...