EC directive on equality 'flouted': The Government is accused of discriminating against 50,000 women pensioners paid less in invalidity benefits than men. Ian MacKinnon reports
Monday 31 August 1992
Women reaching the age of 60 face a cut in benefits based on the level of their old age pension, while men receive the full amount up to their pensionable age of 65.
The Social Security Commission, an independent Crown body headed by a judge who rules on appeals and matters of principle, has declared Britain's stance on invalidity benefit discriminatory and urged equal treatment.
Peter Lilley, the Secretary of State for Social Security, and Whitehall officials decided to contest the commissioner's ruling in a case that is likely to be heard in the Court of Appeal before the end of the year.
The Government has circulated all social security offices instructing them to withhold the extra sums, but has indicated that it would pay out any arrears should the court reject its arguments.
However, the department's policy branch has conceded it might relent if the 'customer was terminally ill or if he, or she, was experiencing dire financial hardship'.
But a letter advising claimants of the present state of play is less generous. It states: 'If the Court of Appeal decides that the benefit should not be increased, you will continue to be entitled to the rate of benefit you are getting now, unless there are other changes which affect the rate. You do not have the right to appeal against this decision.'
Women who retire on health grounds before their 55th birthday, and men before their 60th, are entitled to a basic invalidity benefit plus another element.
It may be an invalidity allowance, or an additional component, fixed by the level of National Insurance contributions in the last tax year before they stopped work.
When the women reach statutory retirement age they become eligible for the standard old age pension, but alternatively may opt to continue receiving invalidity benefits instead.
If they choose the latter and were in receipt of the additional component, under existing regulations they will find this component withdrawn and replaced by the invalidity allowance, a smaller amount.
On the other hand, men on invalidity benefits will not reach retirement age until their 65th birthday and are able to continue claiming the additional component until then.
The discrimination results from the difference in retirement age between men and women, a discrepancy which the Government has already committed itself to equalising, though this may take many years.
The Department of Social Security maintains that the European directive on equal treatment for men and women allows for different pensionable ages, including additional benefits.
It was on that basis that it planned to contest the Social Security Commissioner's ruling that UK law is discriminatory.
Sally Witcher, a campaign worker for Disability Alliance, an umbrella group, attacked the Government's stance, accusing it of going to 'any lengths' to avoid making payments.
'They will fight this all the way and then if they lose they will find some other way of stopping it so that they don't have to backdate it,' she said.
'They have done this numerous times with social security benefits. It's not particularly surprising, but it's sad for the individuals who actually need the money.'
Belle Knox: How the porn star student from Duke University became bigger than Justin Bieber
Oscar Pistorius trial: Neighbour feared athlete would use gun that killed his girlfriend Reeva Steenkamp to shoot himself
Top 10 most expensive cities in the world: Singapore named costliest place to live – but what about London?
Oscar Pistorius trial: Athlete 'cheated on me' with Reeva Steenkamp, former girlfriend Samantha Taylor tells Pretoria court
Channel 4 announces two-hour TV show to be broadcast 'Live from Space' later this month
Apple's Tim Cook: Business isn’t just about making profit
Thousands of young people forced to go without food after benefits wrongly stopped under 'draconian' new sanctions regime
Ukraine crisis: New navy chief 'defects' and surrenders Crimean HQ as Putin claims ultranationalists forced intervention
Britain's top vet sparks controversy with call for ban on slashing animals' throats in 'ritual' slaughters for halal and kosher meat products
Ukraine crisis: Russia dismisses '3am ultimatum' as 'total nonsense'
If you're horrified by a flame-roasted dog, you should be shocked at a hog roast
- 1 The future of sex: The first female condoms were derided, mistrusted and shunned - but will their modern counterparts catch on?
- 2 South African rhino finally put down after roaming Kruger park for days with horn hacked off and bullet in brain
- 3 Italian pensioner hires an escort who turns out to be his son's girlfriend
- 4 Orgasm machine to deliver climax at the push of a button
- 5 Channel 4 announces two-hour TV show to be broadcast 'Live from Space' later this month
£12000 per annum: Inspiring Interns: A small but growing chain of boutique hot...
£12000 per annum: Inspiring Interns: The company works with Tier 1 FTSE 100 Ba...
£45 - 60k Per Annum: Charter Selection: Highly profitable leisure brand, marke...
£30000 - £50000 per annum + Highly Competitive Salary: Austen Lloyd: Residenti...