Governors and heads warned over school tests: Patten steps up pressure as council goes to Court of Appeal over teachers' boycott
The letter, sent to heads and chairs of governing bodies on the eve of a court case which will decide whether a teachers' boycott of this summer's tests is legal, does not detail what heads and governors should do, but says: 'It will be your responsibility to make it clear that you expect the teachers in your school to fulfill their professional and contractual duty to administer the tests.'
The Association of Teachers and Lecturers yesterday began balloting more than 98,000 members in state schools on a testing boycott. The National Association of Schoolmasters Union of Women Teachers has already voted for a boycott and the National Union of Teachers is also balloting members.
As the battle between Mr Patten and the teacher unions gathers pace, the extent to which governors will be held legally liable for the effects of the boycott is being debated.
Even if Wandsworth council loses its case in the Court of Appeal against the NASUWT, which begins today, the boycott will face a fresh legal challenge. A right-wing pressure group, the Campaign for Real Education, yesterday repeated its threat to take to court heads and governors who say they support the boycott.
Heads and governors, however, believe that the success of legal action against governing bodies is far from certain. Walter Ulrich, of the National Association of Governors and Managers, said the legal situation was unclear: 'The key fact is that governors can't make these tests happen if teachers won't conduct them.'
David Hart, general secretary of the National Association of Head Teachers, said: 'I don't think governors should worry . . . To talk about taking governors to court when they can only operate through the agency of the head and with the co-operation of the teachers is to misunderstand how schools work.
'No amount of sabre rattling by the Government will make a blind bit of difference to the boycott.'
Governors might be vulnerable to an action by parents, but even then a claim for damages would be difficult to prosecute. It would be necessary to show that children's education had been damaged because they had not taken the tests or to claim money paid to outside teachers brought in to conduct the tests.
The biggest problem for a governing body facing such a challenge would be finding the money to cover legal costs.
What can governors do in response to Mr Patten's warning? Teachers in most schools are employed by local authorities, not governors, so, as Mr Hart pointed out, councillors are responsible for docking pay. Only governors in voluntary-aided schools and those which have opted out of local authority control employ teachers.
The Department for Education would not say yesterday whether Mr Patten expected heads and governors to take disciplinary action against teachers. His letter asks them simply to give 'a clear lead'. Unless the boycott is declared illegal by the courts, even that seems unlikely.
Mr Patten would have little to gain from a court case against governors. It would raise the political temperature and threaten the Government's policy that schools should manage their own budgets. That policy depends on thousands of governors volunteering to manage schools.
- 2 Top Gear: Jodie Kidd, Philip Glenister and Guy Martin 'in advanced talks' to join show
- 3 General Election 2015: 14-year-old boy asks Nick Clegg – 'can you kill Katie Hopkins?'
- 4 University student in court for allegedly covering housemates' food in window cleaner and spit
In defence of liberal democracy
The Rothschild Libel: Why has it taken 200 years for an anti-Semitic slur that emerged from the Battle of Waterloo to be dismissed?
General Election 2015: UK will be 'run for the wealthy and powerful' if Tories retain power, Labour warns
General election live: SNP suspends two members for disrupting Labour rally
Schools forced to act as 'miniature welfare states' with teachers buying underwear and even haircuts for poor pupils
Andy McSmith's Sketch: Feisty audience is the real star of an enlightening show
£13676.46 - £16411.61 per annum + OTE: SThree: SThree Trainee Recruitment Cons...
£18000 - £22000 per annum + training: Ashdown Group: Business and Marketing Gr...
£20000 - £25000 per annum + Commission: SThree: Are you great at building rela...
£20000 - £22000 per annum + excellent benefits: Ashdown Group: Application Sup...