Anne Darwin's week in court: 'A woman able to lie and deceive at length'
Sunday 20 July 2008
Latest in Home News
On Facebook
From the blogs
CC kills more people than cervical cancer; why haven’t we heard about it?
There is a disease whose incidence is rising in the UK and most of the industrialised world. However...
We need to avoid another ‘lost generation’
A tiny green shoot one day, and then a chill wind the next. Anyone hoping for signs of economic spr...
More than half of Afghanistan’s families live in extreme poverty
Leila is watching her baby intently, as his mouth moves trying to swallow the small blob of yellow p...
Time for a new approach to alcohol
Ambulances were called and three drunk teenagers were brought to my care. One was so drunk we had to...
In 2002, John Darwin, who, with his wife Anne, owned a portfolio of properties in the North-east, went canoeing off the coast and disappeared. No body was found; he was presumed drowned, and his wife collected insurance and pension payouts worth about £250,000. Then, last December, Mr Darwin turned up at a London police station. It emerged that Mrs Darwin had known of his faked death all along.
Monday
Anne Darwin goes on trial at Teesside Crown Court charged with 15 counts of money-laundering and deception. Andrew Robertson QC, prosecuting, said that after her husband's "death", Mrs Darwin put on a "great act", completely fooling a police liaison officer. Mrs Darwin's defence is "marital coercion". Mr Robertson said this defence requires that she prove her husband was present each time an offence was committed. He also said the deceptions were motivated by the couple's debts, totalling £309,000.
Tuesday
The Darwins' sons told the court they felt "betrayed" by a mother who kept up the pretence of her husband's death. Mark, 32, said: "She flung her arms around me. She said, 'He's gone, I think. I have lost him.' She wouldn't stop crying for ages." Anthony, 29, said he felt "disbelief and anger" when his father reappeared. Mr Robertson said: "The brothers contacted their mother and on receipt of this news that her husband was still alive, she pretended to be overcome with emotion... It is the Crown's submission that far from dealing with a shrinking violet, we have here a determined, resolute woman who was able to lie and deceive at length."
Wednesday
Within weeks of Mr Darwin's disappearance, the court heard, he rang his wife, crying and pleading to come home. Finally, she relented, and he returned to live in a house they owned next to their home. Mrs Darwin said she suggested they solve their problems by bankruptcy, but her husband, whom she described as "very manipulative", refused. Later, with the money obtained by insurance claims, he set up home in Panama, sending her emails urging her to join him, which she did.
Thursday
Mrs Darwin said her husband was domineering, had had an affair, and often joked that "the only time I take her out is to vote". He was engrossed in an online role-playing game and later flew out to the US to see a woman he'd met via this game. She said she could not stop him "because what John wanted, John got". Mr Darwin returned, having lost £30,000. Mrs Darwin said he alone handled their money and kept her ignorant of their debts. As these mounted, she suggested selling some of their rental properties, but he said this was not possible because their mortgage meant they "would have to sell all or nothing". It was around then that her husband said he was probably worth more dead than alive.
Friday
Still on the witness stand, Mrs Darwin said that she thought the pretence of her husband's "death" would last only a few months. Asked if faking a death to claim insurance money was fraud, she replied: "I didn't understand it to be fraud at the time." The trial continues tomorrow.
- 1 Ninety gaffes in ninety years
- 2 Cameron's 'drunk tanks' are dangerous, say police
- 3 Can you master a language in a weekend?
- 4 Rothschild loses libel case, and reveals secret world of money and politics
- 5 No secularism please, we're British
- 6 Apple admits it has a human rights problem
- 7 You couldn't make it up: Sun staff hope Strasbourg can save them from Murdoch
- 1 Ninety gaffes in ninety years
- 2 Spotify: 1 million plays, £108 return
- 3 Apple admits it has a human rights problem
- 4 Rothschild loses libel case, and reveals secret world of money and politics
- 5 Rangers future could be bright says administrator
- 6 MP faces charges over Nazi stag night
- 7 Six Grammys, five years off: Adele puts love before career
- 8 No secularism please, we're British
- 9 Mark Steel: If religion is 'marginal', I'm the Pope
- 10 Lightning kills an entire football team
Free trial of new Independent iPad app
Get your daily dose of the best of British journalism, sponsored by American Airlines
Amazing restaurant offers
Three glasses of free champagne and a special menu at 46 top London restaurants.
Latest Independent competitions
Win anything from gadgets to five-star holidays on our competitions and offers page.
Commercial thought leaders
Watch the best in the business world give their insights into the world of business.
Career Services
Day In a Page
How an abortion divided America
Did they all live happily ever after? That's up to you...




Comments