Attenborough: Genesis? It can go forth and multiply
The Bible is to blame for devastation of the planet, says Sir David Attenborough
GETTY IMAGES
Sir David Attenborough yesterday blamed the Book of Genesis for all number of environment ills, from deforestation to the extinction of species
He has romped with gorillas, turned his back on grizzly bears and found himself knee-deep in suffocating bat dung. After decades of getting to know the furthest-flung corners of the world – and its inhabitants – Sir David Attenborough has vented his ire on the Bible for promoting the belief that man has complete dominion over the Earth.
Sir David, probably the best-loved broadcaster and certainly the most distinguished television naturalist, has blamed the Book of Genesis for many environmental problems, from the burning down of tropical rainforests to the extinction of species.
On the eve of a BBC1 documentary on the life of Charles Darwin and his theory of evolution, Sir David has criticised the centuries-old idea running through the Judaeo-Christian tradition which assumes God gave the Earth to man to exploit and use in whatever way he saw fit in order to populate the world.
Sir David, 82, said the devastation of the environment has its roots in the first words that God supposedly uttered to humankind, as detailed in Genesis 1:28: "Be fruitful and multiply, and fill the earth and subdue it; and have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the birds of the air, and over every living thing that moves upon the earth."
An atheist raised in an academic, non-religious family, Sir David said Genesis peddled untruths about how animals and plants appeared on earth and was also at the root of why there was now serious environmental degradation due to the greedy overexploitation of the earth's natural resources.
"The influence of the Book of Genesis, which says the Lord God said 'go forth and multiply' to Adam and Eve and 'the natural world is there for you to dominate', [is that] you have dominion over the animals and plants of the world," Sir David said.
"That basic notion, that the world is there for us and if it doesn't actually serve our purposes, it's dispensable, that has produced the devastation of vast areas of the land's surface.
"Of course it's a gross oversimplification, but that's why Darwinism, and the fact of evolution, is of great importance because it is that attitude which has led to the devastation of so much, and we are in the situation that we are in," he told the science journal Nature.
In tomorrow's documentary, Charles Darwin and the Tree of Life, Sir David does not mention the Bible directly but there is an oblique reference to its influence in his concluding statements about the important principles of evolution encapsulated by Darwin in his 1859 book, On the Origin of Species.
"Darwin's great insight revolutionised the way in which we see the world ... But above all Darwin has shown us that we are not apart from the natural world – we do not have dominion over it. We are subject to its laws and processes, as are all the other animals on earth to which indeed we are related."
Sir David has received hate mail from viewers upset that he does not give God credit in his nature programmes and some correspondence from creationists makes him angry.
"Evolution is not just a theory, as many a correspondent writes to me and says. It is a historical fact like any other historical fact and as certain as William the Conqueror landing in 1066, except it's more certain because the evidence for it comes from a much wider range of fact," Sir David said.
"All we have to tell us about William are a few bits of paper here or there – not very much at all. For evolution, we have much more evidence," he said.
Sir David has misunderstood the scriptures
Catherine Pepinster, Editor, The Tablet
David Attenborough is right to talk about the influence of the Book of Genesis on our relationship with the rest of creation, for the first book of the Bible is the foundation of the theological account of humanity's relationship with the land. It is a story of the struggle for survival, of a people for whom the desert was very close and very threatening.
But the idea that you survive by treating the world as if it is dispensable and only there for our purposes is to misunderstand was is meant in scripture by "dominion". If you go back to the roots of that term you find that it means a kingly rule of the kind bestowed by the shepherd-king David. It means rule in God's image, a pastoral rule of great care. In other words, stewardship.
Stewardship means responsibility. It means acting like Noah to preserve the animals threatened with flood. Increasing numbers of Christians today are rethinking their relationship with the environment, with God's creation. This planet is not ours to use and abuse. It is to be tended, helped to blossom and to be fruitful. Otherwise we will indeed turn the world into a desert.
View all comments that have been posted about this article.
Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.
- Print Article
- Email Article
-
Click here for copyright permissions
Copyright 2009 Independent News and Media Limited


Comments
if it wasn't so o obvious it would be funny. In fact it is funny to see and hear these angry children raging at an indifferent father figure
Have you actually met any atheists? If not, you'll find that we tend to be quite rational in our approach and beliefs. We have taken a good look at the world around us and have realised that not only is there no need for a god but that religions are so full of internal contradictions that it should be impossible for any sane person to follow one.
So, no anger there. No blame. Just sadness that so many people continue to fall into the trap of thinking that the universe has an owner.
Interesting that at the start of a paragraph claiming that athiests are just angry children, vhawk1951 makes an argument that is so weak, I would have though it could only come from a child. Don't deny it vhawk1951, or you'll prove me right!
" Allah is the One who has made you the inheritors of the earth ( viceregent) and raised some of you in ranks over others so that He may test you in what He has given you. Indeed your Lord is swift in inflicting punishment; yet He is also very Forgiving and Merciful"
Syed H Aljoofre
But where does it actually say that man is accountable? You've just said that Allah in your quote that Allah tests us - NOT that he has made us accountable - and since we cannot know God's plan, how are we to know God's criteria?
There are much better quotes that you can use in the Koran. Please use them if you truly wish to argue your case on this.
You have to smile, don't you.
For example, the argument by many American fundamentalists that they love their God and their guns in absurd, but it is used as a vehicle to achieve specific agendas. As the world's resources are depleted the more radical elements will turn to their understanding of the Bible as justifiction for their actions. Bush's claim that God told him to invade Iraq is of course the classic example. The United States how has access to vast quantities of oil and a new government is not going to change that. The Old Testament is used as justification by Jewish settlers to remove Palestinians from their land.
Religion has become such a profound part of the fabric of our life that it will always be used to justify others actions.
The main problem is that people of different religious 'background' presume that 'the idea of creation' or whatever, is something that they have to drill it deep inside the head of children.
finding a way to illegalize 'inheriting religion' from parents to offspring is the right path to stop religious influence by default is the answer to move forward.
of course, it should be applied to all kind of ideological beliefs as well.
We learn a huge amount from our parents. Such a prohibition would be unenforceable and abhorrent. You'd have to take children away from their parents early, and then have another ideologue indoctrinate them with a state-sponsored ideology.
Research shows that groups benefit from diverse worldviews, and monoculture of ideologies is bad, no matter what the ideology in question.
And, yes,Abrahamic beliefs have a lot of violence to answer for, but non Christian societies have the same environmental impact, so one can not blame it solely on Genesis.
Ans vhawks's assertions are typical of the shallow minset that reinforces irrational beliefs like Abrahamic religions.
Far beyond the supernatural but comforting images atheists alienate people by mocking, this usage is the real problem with religion. And the problem with Dawkins and Hitchens types is that it's bleedingly historically obvious such usages aren't restricted to religion, and that everybody waking up atheists tomorrow wouldn't fix a damn thing. It's historically illiterate to pretend otherwise.
Second, there's no doubt Attenborough was right to criticize the spirit of that comment. But it is a chicken-and-egg question. Did the passage encourage people to exploit the Earth? Or did people's desire to exploit the earth encourage them to interpret the passage the way they did? Did people's desire to exploit the earth make them more amenable to religions like Christianity and Islam, whose sacred books contain these ambiguous passages that seem to excuse their base behaviour? And less amenable to religions like some strains of Buddhism and animism, that encourage a degree of self-denial or respect for and participation with the natural world?
While I'm whingeing, that's something else I can't stand about Hitchensy-Dawkinsy atheists - their unveiled eurocentrism. They seem to have a hard time admitting eastern and animistic religions, anything but the People of the Book, even count - showing that their 'rationality' rests, pathetically, on the same prejudices they ascribe so vociferously to Christianity, Judaism, and Islam. Just more evidence that everybody waking up atheists tomorrow wouldn't fix anything - the disrespect and ignorance of other cultures would continue without a break.
(PS - Just can't be bothered to talk religion this morning)
The very notion of a doctrine that advocates a 'go forth and multiply' approach to life has in part caused the world's population to swell to over 6.3 billion. We are now a plague upon the world and we need to do something to seriously reduce our numbers (or I dare say, mother nature will, or we will simply have another World War as a result of competition for scarce resources).
The Catholic church's stance on abortion and contraception only fuels the ever-expanding numbers of the human race. The orthodox religions attempt to dominate each other in numbers. Just because we can breed uncontrollably, does not mean we should.
Well done Sir David, it's a shame there aren't more venerable wise men and women out there to share their experience and common sense. Politics could do with people like him to bring a more-balanced view to governance of our society.
I'm with you, Sir David. We evolved, we saw, we tried to conquer and in the process, we screwed it all up.
vhawk 1951
In my experience, Christianity as a whole states the the Bible should be taken quite literally, but some bits,(to suit whom?) can or should be taken with a small pinch of salt?
I don't agree that all peoples have an instinctive belief in a great spirit? that statement makes me feel quite lonely.
It never fails to amaze me that seemingly grown up, serious adult folk, will blithely put so much faith in an invisible God that may or may not be there? and then be admired and adulated for it, as in Pope, Archbishop, in fact, most all religious clerics.
Having read one or two versions of the Bible, the only sensible, coherent facts I could find in the whole book were the 10 commandments, they seem a quite sensible set of rules to try to apply to ones life.
In difficult circumstances be they personal or global, we are asked to pray...I have done my share of that in the past, before I saw common sense, and I have to say, not one single prayer has ever been answered, (I must be a real bad lot) in fact, I had more answers when sending letters to Santa in my childhood.
I come from a country where Hindus annually visit the sea and throw all their " prayer material", into the water. I see the Muslims of Dubai building empires in the water. So for me, it's not singular to Genesis and Christians.
As an atheist, I can see no difference in the thought capacity of Christians, Muslims, Hindus or any other..they all limit one's reasoning ability and it shows very clearly in their actions.