UK

Partly Sunny with Showers 6° London Hi 11°C / Lo 7°C

BA strike threat to Christmas getaway

By Martin Hickman, Consumer Affairs Correspondent

BA faces strike action

REUTERS

BA faces strike action by 14,000 union members over planned job cuts

British Airways staff fighting planned cuts in cabin crew are to vote on strike action next month in a bad-tempered dispute that threatens to paralyse the heavily loss-making airline over the busy Christmas period.

The Unite union called a ballot of 13,000 BA members yesterday in response to BA's decision earlier this month to reduce the number of crew from 16 November as part of a desperate attempt to cut costs.

BA, which made its biggest ever annual loss of £401m in the year to April, has been negotiating with stewards for nine months over proposals to reduce its 14,000 cabin crew by 1,700 full-time posts. The ballot – about which BA said it was "disappointed" – was announced as the Royal Mail held fresh talks with the Communication Worker's Union in a bid to avert a planned strike by 121,000 postal workers this Thursday, Friday and Saturday.

In further industrial strife, the RMT union has threatened retaliation against Network Rail over maintenance jobs; thousands of First Group bus drivers are protesting over a pay freeze; London Underground staff are in a long-running dispute; and rubbish is piling up on the streets of Leeds in an eight-week strike by refuse collectors.

BA's chief executive, Willie Walsh, who has been battling to cope with the recession, high fuel prices and low-cost airlines, has already cut free snacks on short-haul flights and asked staff to work for a month without pay this year in an attempt to steer the airline to profitability.

Yesterday the former national flag-carrier announced it would reduce staffing on short- and long-haul flights, reducing, for instance, staffing on a Boeing 747 jet from a current complement of 15 to 14, against a legal minimum of 12. It will also slash the income of new recruits by one-third, while still offering them 10 per cent more than other airlines.

BA pointed out that it paid its cabin crew more than rivals, with stewards earning an average of £29,900 a year including bonuses and allowances, compared with £14,400 at Virgin Atlantic and less at budget airlines. In a statement, it stressed it was not changing individual terms and conditions and that three-quarters of crew would be put on new pay scales, increasing salaries by between 2 and 7 per cent.

"Our current cabin crew remain the best paid in the country by some way," the Heathrow-based carrier said, adding that more than 1,000 cabin crew wanted voluntary redundancy and 3,000 part-time working. "We have put together a package of changes, which despite the unprecedented financial circumstances facing the company, not only protects current cabin crew but also offers many new benefits," BA said.

Derek Simpson, joint general secretary of Unite, accused the airline of bringing about the ballot by imposing the deal rather than continuing to negotiate.

"BA management's determination to impose unacceptable contractual changes on cabin crew leaves us no alternative," he complained. "Negotiation, not imposition, is the only proper way to conduct industrial relations."

While promising to remain ready for talks, Unite said the proposed changes constituted a "fundamental attack" on the quality of the airline that would eventually damage its reputation and business in the long-term. The union said: "They will not only hit the customer service core of the business, but will forever undermine BA's international reputation as a premier airline with premier crew providing a premier service."

In a briefing note, Capital Economics consultancy suggested Britain's current industrial strife was much less serious than the Winter of Discontent in 1978-79. "Any disruption is likely to remain pretty minor," said UK economist Vicky Redwood.

"For a start, the workers at many of these companies have a history of taking industrial action and so are not necessarily representative of sentiment in the workforce as a whole.

"The bigger point is that the vast majority of companies have managed to cut jobs and reduce or freeze wages over the past year or so without too much trouble."

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

New uniform
[info]timspooner wrote:
Tuesday, 27 October 2009 at 02:59 am (UTC)
Cloth caps and donkey jackets all round for the new breed of flight attendants/Union members. When the company goes bust, they will blame "The Bosses"", as usual. Virgin won't want stirrers, so it will be the dole for the grannies who populate BA flight crews
London Airways
[info]nixcails wrote:
Tuesday, 27 October 2009 at 07:17 am (UTC)
This comes as no surprise that the staff at London Airways are militant, workshy, money grabbers.
Having flown British Airways a few times when it was chosen by my employers not my choice I found crew surly, lazy and unfriendly. And since they serve very few airports across the UK focussing on the mess at Heathrow they aren't very British. Definitely London Airways like the capital itself, overpriced, Rude, Aggressive and inefficient. I hope the strike puts a nail in "British Airways" coffin, because the airline deserves to go under- but no doubt would be propped up by state aid from a Brown or Cameron government if that did happen sadly.
[info]democraticact wrote:
Tuesday, 27 October 2009 at 07:23 am (UTC)
It is hard to understand the motive of those who want to see the impoverishment of others. The ultimate expression of the economics of "beggar thy neighbour", is the unemployment that is funded by the working taxpayer that carries with it the threat of us all being dragged down the same road. (It was what Maynard Keynes was really addressing - unlike the sham Keynesianism of bank bail outs.) The great modern challenge - which the Scandinavians are trying to tackle - is in a high wage high output economy with full employment. We all benefit from the spending of others and we know for certain now that that money must be earned or borrowed with serviceable loans. It is a matter, not just of morality but of enlightened self interest that we make an inclusive and egalitarian society. We are in a hole of our own making that we have been digging for the last 30 years. But you can start to climb out of it: go to democraticbritain.org.uk
BA BULLS++T
[info]sheffieldal wrote:
Tuesday, 27 October 2009 at 07:53 am (UTC)
THis is the same company that ask it workers to fall on it knife a few mouths ago now the same company is asking for more ever do there still making money ,am not surprise that the workfoce as turn around and gone for a stike.
London Airways ,if you was been S++T on how would you feel? no good i would think
Cabin crew strike
[info]ted_fox wrote:
Tuesday, 27 October 2009 at 09:13 am (UTC)
British Airways is finding it really difficult to compete as the cost base is just too high. The facts are relatively simple, the travelling public are, in the main, unwilling to pay the premium rates that airlines used to charge, therefore, to remain in business, airlines need to tackle their costs. This has been addressed across the rest of the airline with management 'culls', more effective processes. etc. These improvements now need to be found in the cabin crew depts.

As an example, we need to reduce the number of staff and get some of the 'non customer' facing staff to become 'customer facing' because that's what the business is about. Without these changes, we may not be able to compete, and risk losing all.

BA cabin crew are by far the highest paid cabin crew in the UK, and I'm sure with some long term planning WW (Willie Walsh) would be able to take on alternative staff. l don't believe that he has any plan for that yet, however, his hand may be forced to ensure the airline survives. WW really needs to win this dispute, as even a compromise doesn't really meet the airlines needs.

In my humble opinion, the cabin crew will get very little support across the other depts within the airline, as they are now focussed on creating an airline that will survive the downturn in the airline business..

Come on guys, let's keep together as British Airways, and don't hand the game to the opposition!!

[info]democraticact wrote:
Tuesday, 27 October 2009 at 10:29 am (UTC)
Privatisation has ruined a great company. If memory serves; in its nationalised heyday British Airways employed around 60,000 people. For such a big business their wages and conditions were second to none. If market forces are what now determines BA's existence then the cuts that Willie Walsh wants now won't save it. That could only happen if pay scales were less, and load factors more than "the opposition". And the unions know that.
[info]cm999 wrote:
Tuesday, 27 October 2009 at 12:51 pm (UTC)
I wonder what the total reumeration for the Directors was for last years loss. Perhaps they should lead by example before imposing the changes on the rest of the workforce.
Bad timing
[info]lasvegasrich wrote:
Tuesday, 27 October 2009 at 04:22 pm (UTC)
BA just started non-stop service to my Las Vegas, and now the unions want to go strike. Bad timing. I hope everything can be worked out, as I enjoyed my two visits to the UK in recent years, and I know that Brits would enjoy the shows, gambling, and glamour of Vegas.
IGNORANT COMMENTS FROM USELESS INDIVIDUALS MEAN CR@P:
[info]bgarvie wrote:
Tuesday, 27 October 2009 at 04:36 pm (UTC)
timspooner#

You are full of cr@p. If you cannot be constructive, please refrain from making such fuc.... useless comments. As they say in the flying game, "Do you like sex and travel?" Well fork off then.
Union With A Death Wish
[info]mike4626 wrote:
Tuesday, 27 October 2009 at 05:12 pm (UTC)
how many of their members will be laid off now. No one with any sense will book a BA flight knowing the company is likely to be strangled by an idiot union.
[info]mad9_man wrote:
Tuesday, 27 October 2009 at 07:24 pm (UTC)
Hands up all those who think tosser Walsh is worth 700grand ayear ? And what about all the other overpaid w******s at BA Waterside HQ - do we need them? JUst what I thought.
OBNOXIOUS NIXCAILS: ????er+
[info]bgarvie wrote:
Wednesday, 28 October 2009 at 04:10 pm (UTC)
For the attention of the obnoxious nixcails # (What is your real name???)

Sounds like you didn't get your free upgrade when you travelled BA because you sound like a complete loser. I know many BA Cabin Crew and they are very fine people and extremely hard working. Your comments are complete cr@p and demonstrate a complete lack of humanity. You are obviously a nasty person, but I can assure you life has a strange way of getting back at cocky, obnoxious people like you.
[info]mad9_man wrote:
Wednesday, 28 October 2009 at 06:48 pm (UTC)
in support of bg I too would like to know who is hiding behind the soppy nom de plume of nixcails - I too speak pig latin so 'amscray the ixnay'. Making destructive comments like he / she / not sure does only ensures one thing, nixcails - your vileness will come back to bite you on the ass...hard

Most popular


Article Archive

Day In a Page

Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat

Select date