Bank customers saving nearly £1 billion a year in overdraft charges after reforms
Following stints with Reuters and the Press Association, Martin Hickman joined The Independent as a news editor in 2001. He became the Consumer Affairs Correspondent in September 2005 and has run the paper's trenchant campaigns on packaging, bank charges and factory-farmed chicken. He writes on subjects as diverse as food, finance, energy and fashion. With Tom Watson, he is author of a new book on the phone hacking scandal, Dial M for Murdoch - News Corporation and the Corruption of Britain.
Friday 25 January 2013
Bank customers are saving almost £1 billion a year in overdraft charges thanks to reforms introduced after a public revolt against them, but high street providers must do more if they are to escape a competition investigation into their industry, a report warned today.
In a review of the £9bn-a-year market in personal current accounts, the Office of Fair Trading (OFT) estimated that the public was annually saving up to £928 million a year from the lowering of unauthorised overdraft fees between 2007 and 2011.
The Independent led the campaign against the charges, of up to £37 a time, for running up an unauthorised debt of just £1, arguing they were disproportionate. The banks paid out hundreds of millions of pounds in civil settlements to individuals before winning a test case against the OFT at the Supreme Court in 2009.
By then they had already agreed to reform their charges, phasing out the high one-off charges for a more complex but cheaper range of fees.
In its first study of current accounts since 2008, the OFT complained there were still serious flaws with them including the complexity of the reformed overdraft fees and, more notably, the difficulty of switching banks.
Since it last studied the market, it added that some smaller providers had been pushed out of business by the financial crisis, leaving the biggest players - Lloyds, RBS, Barclays and HSBC - with 75 per cent of the market.
The Government regulator concluded: “Overall, a combination of a lack of competition, low levels of innovation and customer apathy in the face of unclear costs and a lack of diversity in the choices of current accounts available mean that this market is not working well for consumers or the wider economy.”
It expressed hope that the forthcoming sale of Lloyds and RBS branches, better comparison of financial products, and a new automated account switching service would give customers a better deal.
As a result it has provisionally decided not to refer current account providers to the Competition Commission for a market investigation, but said it planned “to revisit the question by 2015” – giving the banks two years to improve.
A market investigation by the Competition Commission would have sweeping powers to seize documents and could result in the break up of companies and services.
Clive Maxwell, the OFT’s chief executive, said: “Despite some improvements, this market is still not serving consumers as well as it should. Customers still find it difficult to assess which account offers the best deal and lack confidence that they can switch accounts easily. This prevents them from driving effective competition between providers.”
Mr Maxwell said: “The retail banking sector needs to become more competitive and customer-focused to ensure that further action by the competition authorities is not required.”
The high street banks said they were committed to improving services.
Anthony Browne, chief executive of the British Bankers' Association, which represents the major UK banks, said: "We welcome the OFT's decision not to refer this issue to the Competition Commission and will continue to work with them to make further improvements for customers and the wider economy."
Guy Anker, news editor of Moneysavingexpert.com, which too campaigned against penalty fees for overdraft charges, hailed a victory for consumers, saying that banks had been forced to lower “sometimes hideous fees for the long term.”
He said: "Banks may have won the court case to stop mass reclaiming, but the benefits of the campaign are there for all to see.”
- 1 Scottish independence: Ireland since 1919 is a lesson for Scotland in what a Yes vote means
- 2 British tourists 'murdered' in Thailand: Pair's bloodied bodies found naked on Koh Tao beach
- 3 Lego breaks out of the toy box and heads for the gallery
- 4 Vogue under fire for 'Big Booty' article
- 5 Julian Assange and Edward Snowden join piracy mogul Kim Dotcom’s political campaign in New Zealand
British tourists 'murdered' in Thailand: Pair's bloodied bodies found naked on Koh Tao beach
Russia freezes Ukraine into submission: Kiev admits country doesn't have enough fuel for winter
Jihadi John': MI5 may have identified Isis militant who killed David Haines but options limited
Scottish independence: Police will be on high alert on Friday whatever the result
David Haines beheading: David Cameron says Britain will hunt down Isis 'monsters' shown in video murdering aid worker
Daniele Watts: Django Unchained actress detained by Los Angeles police after being mistaken for a prostitute
The political class is doing what Hitler couldn’t – destroying Britain
Scottish independence: Nationalist leader Jim Sillars threatens pro-union companies with 'day of reckoning' after independence
Scottish independence: Yes campaign feels the heat as Alex Salmond's NHS claims come under furious attack
£23m Birmingham cycle scheme is attacked by Tory councillor for not catering to the elderly
Salmond accused of laughing off national debt with ‘what are they going to do: invade?’ joke
£400000 Per Annum: The Green Recruitment Company: Job Title: Energy Markets An...
£30000 - £35000 Per Annum Plus excellent benefits: Clearwater People Solutions...
£22000 - £23000 per annum: Randstad Education Bristol: We are currently recrui...
£35000 - £40000 Per Annum: Clearwater People Solutions Ltd: We are currently r...