UK

Partly Sunny with Showers 9° London Hi 12°C / Lo 6°C

Branson hopes for third time lucky on lottery bid

By Kunal Dutta

Richard Branson

GETTY

Richard Branson is keen to add theNational Lottery to his empire

Bruised by his two unsuccessful bids in the past to run the National Lottery, Sir Richard Branson will make an attempt to acquire a stake in the current lottery operator, Camelot, this week, as the deadline looms for the sale of up to an 80 per cent stake in the company.

Bidders have been given a two-week timeframe to table their opening offers. Experts believe that the auction, which is being overseen by the finance houses Greenhill and NM Rothschild, could result in Sir Richard Branson taking over the company.

The move comes as four of Camelot's five shareholders – Thales Electronics, Fujitsu, Cadbury and De La Rue – put their 20 per cent stakes in the lottery-licence holder up for sale.

The fifth shareholder, Royal Mail, is not currently part of the sale process but insiders believe it could decide to sell its stake to the winning bidder. Some estimates are that each 20 per cent holding could fetch anything up to £90m.

Sir Richard, head of the Virgin Group, has crossed paths with Camelot twice in the past. In 2000 he failed to acquire the then-seven-year license, and Camelot had beaten his People's Lottery bid to the initial contract ahead of the lottery's launch in 1994.

It is understood that the prospective bidders are a combination of trade buyers and private-equity firms.

Camelot makes an annual profit of around £30m and it saw sales top £5.1bn in the year to March.

However valuing the stakes is particularly complicated, as there are relatively few international lottery operators.

Nonetheless Mr Branson, who is believed to have approached leading charities to discuss an alliance ahead a bid, is clear of the company's potential value to his business empire.

Camelot won the first licence in 1994 and retained it through the next two rounds. Its latest 10-year licence began in February 2009. The Indian lottery operator Sugal & Damani, which bid unsuccessfully for the license two years ago, is also thought to be taking a close interest in the sale.

Shareholder Cadbury, which is currently the subject of an aggressive £10.2bn takeover by the US company Kraft, is thought to be particularly keen to sell its stake in Camelot, alongside the French defence and electronics company Thales Electronics.

More than 20 prospective bidders for the majority stake in the lottery operator have been told they must submit offers by 18 November. Delays in documentation mean the deadline has been extended a week.

More than a quarter of total lottery revenue is allocated to charities and other good causes, half is paid out to winners as prizes, while 12 per cent is paid to the Government in lottery duty.

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

A tax on stupidity
[info]drmagyar wrote:
Monday, 9 November 2009 at 03:12 am (UTC)
Why do we even have a lottery? Really why do people put up with this nonsense?
If it really is our Lottery
[info]kingofmumu wrote:
Monday, 9 November 2009 at 07:42 am (UTC)
Why is the government is not running the Lottery? Instead of allowing millions ( that could be used for good causes in the UK) to go to a private American company. !00% of the UK lottery Profits should be for the benefit of the British people. Who decides to throw away this money, to private enterprise. Prizes should be £5,000, £10,000, £20,000, £50,000, £100,000 and £1000,000 every now and then. We need useful amounts, not fantasy money for our hard earned pound.
Keep the government out of it.
[info]chippychap wrote:
Monday, 9 November 2009 at 10:04 am (UTC)
Can you imagine this, or any other government running the National Lottery?
They just could not resist it.
They would replace their funding of services with money stolen from the lottery, just as they have done with the 2012 Olympics.
They would relocate lottery funding to only government approved projects
A large pool of cash would be too tempting for any chancellor.
Keep their avaricious fingers off it.

Most popular


Article Archive

Day In a Page

Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat

Select date