Could Maglev trains be the far-sighted solution?
Monday 06 June 2005
Latest in Home News
On Facebook
From the blogs
More than half of Afghanistan’s families live in extreme poverty
Leila is watching her baby intently, as his mouth moves trying to swallow the small blob of yellow p...
Time for a new approach to alcohol
Ambulances were called and three drunk teenagers were brought to my care. One was so drunk we had to...
Bahrain: One year on
I am used to endless lies and criticism from the BNP and its favourite blogster, as well as Islamist...
Paul Volcker stands tall against the banking lobby
Why is Europe, which likes to present itself as an opponent of speculative "Anglo-Saxon" finance, li...
Just imagine getting on a train in London and arriving 400 miles away in Glasgow an hour and 20 minutes later, or nipping down from Manchester to the capital in 40 minutes, or between Birmingham and London in 25 minutes. The current times are respectively four hours 45 minutes, two hours 15 minutes and an hour and a half.
Just imagine getting on a train in London and arriving 400 miles away in Glasgow an hour and 20 minutes later, or nipping down from Manchester to the capital in 40 minutes, or between Birmingham and London in 25 minutes. The current times are respectively four hours 45 minutes, two hours 15 minutes and an hour and a half.
The super-fast journey times could be made possible by the so-called "Maglev" technology, an electro-magnetic system for which the Government is developing an increasing enthusiasm. Having initially registered scepticism, officials are saying it could be an option for a link between London and Scotland.
The only commercially run Maglev route is now taking passengers on the 19-mile journey from Shanghai airport to a new financial centre in the city in just eight minutes - a trip that can take an hour by car.
This is by far and away the fastest train in the world, capable of more than 300mph, and the ride is breathtaking. The train - it is a more like an airliner minus the wings - leaves the station to a salute from a member of staff. One wonders if he is registering respect for one's bravery.
It accelerates, smoothly enough until it reaches 267 mph - nearly 100 miles an hour faster than a British Airways Boeing 777 at take-off. The speed, which was much appreciated by the Chancellor on his recent visit to China, can be fully grasped by watching the cars on an adjacent motorway.
It is possible for passengers to see out of the front of the train, viewing services coming in the opposite direction. The combined velocity is 534mph and the pressure waves created as the two trains pass makes the inexperienced passenger feel he has experienced a millisecond of Armageddon.
To add to the feeling of insecurity, the trains shake slightly from side to side. It is certainly not as smooth as the Japanese Shinkansen, but then the so-called Bullet trains - in common with Eurostars in Britain - only reach a pedestrian 186mph.
The Shanghai Magalev, built by the German multinationals Siemens and ThyssenKrupp, has reached 310mph. The original idea is said to be British, but it has been developed elsewhere.
The Shanghai service is restricted to 267mph because it needs time to decelerate before it reaches its destination. It sustains the maximum operational velocity for a minute or so before its has to slow down.
The carriages float on an electro-magnetic cushion about a centimetre above the guideway. Magnetic fields pull it along the track. A member of the train staff sits at the front of the "Transrapid", but that is simply to reassure passengers, officials say, since the train is operated from a control centre.
The Chinese government is coy about the price of the Shanghai link, but it is thought to have been many times the official £1.1bn figure. German managers reckon the Government would have to spend about £20m a kilometre to build such a link in Britain, without the cost of land. Some British officials are sceptical about the technology and any government's readiness to back it, but the days of "wheel on rail" will eventually come to an end and the only system now capable of replacing it is the one hurtling to and fro in Shanghai.
- 1 No secularism please, we're British
- 2 Apple admits it has a human rights problem
- 3 'Drunk tanks' and minimum prices to help Britain sober up
- 4 Working as a jail torturer ruined my life
- 5 Lightning kills an entire football team
- 6 Reinstate Knox's murder charge, Italian court told
- 7 Caught in his own blast: an Iranian targeting Israel
- 1 Spotify: 1 million plays, £108 return
- 2 How Koscielny became prince of the Emirates
- 3 Apple admits it has a human rights problem
- 4 Mark Steel: If religion is 'marginal', I'm the Pope
- 5 No secularism please, we're British
- 6 Lightning kills an entire football team
- 7 Matthew Norman: There's always the Human Rights Act, Trevor
- 8 Special report: The hungry generation
- 9 I was born to be a killer. Every night I see the Devil in my dreams
- 10 Six Grammys, five years off: Adele puts love before career
Free trial of new Independent iPad app
Get your daily dose of the best of British journalism, sponsored by American Airlines
Win a three-week coastal jaunt
Spend three weeks exploring every nook and cranny of gorgeous Atlantic Canada.
Amazing restaurant offers
Three glasses of free champagne and a special menu at 46 top London restaurants.
Latest Independent competitions
Win anything from gadgets to five-star holidays on our competitions and offers page.
Commercial thought leaders
Watch the best in the business world give their insights into the world of business.
Career Services
Day In a Page
How an abortion divided America
Did they all live happily ever after? That's up to you...




Comments