UK

4° London Hi 9°C / Lo 3°C

Dozens held (including Spiderman) after G20 protest raids

Press Association

A police officer arrests a woman after she resisted against being stopped and searched near the Bank of England

Andrew Winning / Reuters

A police officer arrests a woman after she resisted against being stopped and searched near the Bank of England

Police seized dozens of protesters in raids on two squats today as the hunt for violent G20 anarchists continued.

The number of arrests linked to the summit topped 100 as officers rounded up demonstrators accused of smashing their way into the Royal Bank of Scotland.

More than 80 people were detained in two disused buildings within walking distance of the Bank of England.

Hundreds more marchers returned to the Bank today and were involved in a tense stand-off with police who shut adjoining streets.

But there was no repeat of the sporadic violence that marred largely peaceful protests yesterday by campaigners calling for action from world leaders.

And the only groups who gathered in any numbers near the summit venue in east London were Ethiopians protesting about divisions in their home country.

Scotland Yard made 22 further arrests today, including nine for violent disorder, four for possessing an offensive weapon and four for breach of the peace.

The Met said anyone detained at the two squats who was not "of interest" would be released.

Dozens of police and an armoured police van blocked Earl Street, near Liverpool Street station, where a disused office block was raided.

Witnesses said a large convoy of police vans arrived quietly in a back street before riot police smashed their way inside the three-storey red-brick building.

At least 70 people were led out and made to sit in the street outside as they were questioned and searched by officers.

In Rampart Street, Aldgate, where four arrests were made, occupants of the three-storey building complained about police tactics.

One said: "It was major league over the top. They think we are some sort of terrorist masterminds and we are being linked with violence.

"We are not hardened criminals - we are all educated, civil-minded people."

The officer in charge of policing the G20 protest, Commander Bob Broadhurst, said police were using video footage gathered yesterday to track down violent activists.

He said the "overall mood" of yesterday's demonstrations was good. But he added: "Unfortunately small groups of protesters intent on violence mixed with the crowds of lawful demonstrators.

"Some have been arrested already and officers will be looking to identify others through footage from evidence-gatherers."

Tonight officers corralled a group on to the pedestrianised area in front of the Bank.

As a helicopter hovered overhead, lines of police officers cleared milling protesters from surrounding streets.

There were minor skirmishes as other pockets of protesters were also kettled - a police tactic which involves holding them in small areas.

Once the streets at the busy junction were clear, traffic was allowed to continue flowing but exits to Bank Tube station were closed and those on foot were held back.

It was not clear who the group of protesters were but many of them were dressed in black and some carried Communist Party and socialist flags.

A large number of police vans lined nearby Cornhill and a squad of mounted police were on standby in a side street.

Police were taunted with chants of "shame on you" as they forcefully pushed protesters into groups and other officers photographed protesters.

Home Secretary Jacqui Smith made a visit to the police G20 nerve centre today.

A spokesman said: "The Home Secretary received an update on the operations and management of G20 today.

"She was very impressed with the policing response so far and the work the Metropolitan police are doing to make this a safe and secure G20."

* A man who died after being found collapsed at the G20 protests in the City was named by police today. Ian Tomlinson, 47, a City resident, was on his way home from work at a newsagent's when he collapsed near the Bank of England just before 7.30pm yesterday. A Metropolitan Police spokesman said officers had to move the casualty away for urgent treatment after bottles were thrown at them by protesters. He was later pronounced dead at hospital.

A spokesman for the Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC) said: "When all the available information has been assessed, the IPCC will make a decision about the level of involvement it needs to have in progressing the investigation into this case."

* The French "Spiderman" Alain Robert climbed the Lloyd's of London building today to protest over climate change. He unfurled a banner warning of "100 months" to save the world. Onlookers said he leapt out of a silver car which pulled up outside One Lime Street just before midday and began his ascent, without ropes, on the Leadenhall Passage side.

He reached the 9th floor of the 290ft-high building and unfurled a yellow banner before climbing down to street level, where he was met by police and led away.

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

The camera never lies?
[info]daveycooper wrote:
Thursday, 2 April 2009 at 06:09 am (UTC)
Looking at the photos it seems that there were more journalists present than protesters during the violent parts of the process. I don't think we are heading towards mass anarchy in the near future.
Only 90 Arrested
[info]mike4626 wrote:
Thursday, 2 April 2009 at 06:51 am (UTC)
more used to arrested at a single football match, Anarchy? more likely a tiny minority of yobs trying to have their day
Re: Only 90 Arrested
[info]daveycooper wrote:
Thursday, 2 April 2009 at 07:37 am (UTC)
Given the journalists didn't start a crush or trample the police due to their weight of numbers, I guess we can say that the protest passed off peacefully.
Knock Knock
[info]xyberia44 wrote:
Thursday, 2 April 2009 at 06:18 am (UTC)
To much "Police, Camera, Action." Here, I am sure the Script writers of the Bill feel like Pigs in Poo, with all this new source material.

Mr O'Brien, a member of the Met's command team for the G20 security operation, said small pockets of criminals were responsible for the outbreaks of trouble and would be tracked down. ( Well should not be difficult as they all on the Met's Payroll)

But he added that the vast majority of participants were good-humoured. ( yes one has to laugh at the absurdity of the overkill)

Speaking at New Scotland Yard, the senior officer said some of the apparent ringleaders were followed by helicopter as they left flashpoints yesterday.( Followed by helicopter, LMAO ) espcially on Victoria Line and Northern Line...

"As we went on it was clear there were people within the group that were first of all involved in juvenile and puerile behaviour," he said. ( He does describe his own men very eloquently )
One sideness
[info]danielms wrote:
Thursday, 2 April 2009 at 07:18 am (UTC)
I thought one of the principles of journalism was to report the two sides of the story. According to the versions offered by protesters and freelance journalists the police were the ones creating the climate of tension by showing a threatening behaviour and holding up people in pens for hours, and those confiscated 'police uniforms' were part of a street performance. This is just the version of events offered by the police, I expected more from the Independent to be honest.
No Wonder they're angry
[info]dunque123 wrote:
Thursday, 2 April 2009 at 07:24 am (UTC)
There will be less dole to bludge as a consequence of the crisis - maybe they will need to find a proper job or ask daddy for a bigger allowance, if his hedge fund can stand it. One of the best descriptions I saw to describe the majority of the 'anarchists' is trustafarians - google it
Re: No Wonder they're angry
[info]johnjjonz wrote:
Thursday, 2 April 2009 at 11:37 am (UTC)
Have you met any? Were you there yesterday?

The anarchists I know are some of the finest people I have ever met, willing to use their time and energy to help people, dissatisfied with the banality and murder by inaction that characterises the capitalist world we live in.

Your comment, about a protest at which many people sustained injuries from batons (clubs) and shield edges whilst protesting peacefully at the Climate Camp is unfortunately characteristic of this kind of news comment system containing no information, merely spite.
Re: No Wonder they're angry
[info]uanime5 wrote:
Thursday, 2 April 2009 at 12:23 pm (UTC)
So the people who smashed RBS are some of the finest people you know. I'd hate to meet the worsest people you know.
Re: No Wonder they're angry
[info]johnjjonz wrote:
Thursday, 2 April 2009 at 12:51 pm (UTC)

So shocking that some people smashed some windows on a bank during a protest. Perhaps in your mind that is justification for the level of violence shown by the police to large numbers of protestors. Ever hear about the Suffragettes smashing MPs windows with hammers? Perhaps they should never have done such shocking things to promote their cause.

The WORSEST people I know? If you want the most unthinking, brutal, back-covering and dishonourable they were there wearing uniforms and repeating over and over to themselves: "I'm doing what I'm told, that's good. I'm doing what I'm told, that's good."

Shocking Lie
[info]nicksebley wrote:
Thursday, 2 April 2009 at 09:11 am (UTC)
this is an absolutely disgusting article..you call yourself unbiased? where is the protestors side of the story? I was at climate camp all day- peaceful, good humoured etc. until the late afternoon when the riot police turned up and baton charged people who they wanted to move. NO ONE RESPONDED WITH VIOLENCE- people held their hands up and shouted 'this is a not a riot' as they were beaten. Later police used dogs, snatch squads and further baton charges to intimidate and brutalise people who were simply sitting down or dancing and exercising their supposed right to protest. The truth is the police, with the government's backing act as if this is their land, their streets, you can protest within the time and geographical limits set by them but if you step over these you are met with violence, brutality and arrest. I will never buy The Independent again. This lie is so shocking: "The spokeswoman said several hundred campers were moved on peacefully in stages from about midnight onwards. "
If you want another side of the story check out: http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2009/04/426027.html
and
http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2009/04/426026.html

Re: Shocking Lie
[info]penny_reese wrote:
Thursday, 2 April 2009 at 05:51 pm (UTC)
I'd like to know what time the Independent reporter(s) packed up for the day. Most of the mainstream journalists seem to have knocked off around tea-time and it's interesting how the protestors seem to have "become violent" after most of the main press had left.
Mouthpiece of the Met
[info]oldskald wrote:
Thursday, 2 April 2009 at 09:39 am (UTC)
How comforting... the Independent has obviously decided that there is no need to question the official version of events. So much for courageous journalism, the quest for the truth, etc, etc. Perhaps next time the Independent can just print the official Met press release and save itself some time and money...
Media Bias in the Indy?
[info]movefreely wrote:
Thursday, 2 April 2009 at 10:32 am (UTC)
What a shockingly biased version of events .I guess its a case of if you can fool some of the people some of the time...

The Police tactic of kettling . IE keeping people trapped in pens for hours till they become so angry that people react and push forward so the Police can then 'retaliate' in 'self defence' ...

Such tactics are carefully designed to provoke , yet this provocation cannot be caught on camera...clever that.... and effective too in giving journos like this one the opportunity of demonising legitimate peaceful protest
until yesterday that was ...when such tactics may well have killed someone.

Re: Media Bias in the Indy?
[info]uanime5 wrote:
Thursday, 2 April 2009 at 12:37 pm (UTC)
Is this tactic also used in the post office? If so why do they want people to become angry from having to wait for so long?
Re: Media Bias in the Indy?
[info]penny_reese wrote:
Thursday, 2 April 2009 at 06:02 pm (UTC)
I assume your post-office has a habit of penning several hundred people shoulder to shoulder and belly to back for hours at a time without explaining to them why they are being forbidden to leave, then? Because you wouldn't use a biased analogy, would you?
No more britan EU-G whatever.
[info]solvoxuno wrote:
Thursday, 2 April 2009 at 10:49 am (UTC)
British Policing methods
[info]movefreely wrote:
Thursday, 2 April 2009 at 11:28 am (UTC)

Never mind 'the Bill'(ocks) this is what Policing in Britain today really looks like

http://www.britcit.co.uk/content/archives/2009/03/kingsnorth-report-reveals-shocking-police-campaign-of-intimidation-against-protesters.html

Oh yes the old 'dixon of dock green' stereotype the world has of British Police is a little ourdated
Police braced for more G20 violence against peaceful protesters
[info]bethanmcgrath wrote:
Thursday, 2 April 2009 at 11:36 am (UTC)
Police braced for more G20 violence against peaceful protesters:
I was held at the climate camp til midnight last night. When I arrived
at 6pm to celebrate the creative sight of a camp in london's grey
financial streets, the police
allowed me to walk straight into the camp with my bike. As the reports
have said, the atmosphere was very warm and positive; school children
and old time protesters sharing a space full of colour and music.
Within an hour of arriving, those same police, who had stepped back
and let me through, closed in around the camp and refused to let
anyone in or out. I then watched the police push forward into the
crowd with brutality that was not only shocking but utterly
unecessary. All the protesters put their hands in the air and sat down
collectively on the road. Yet as the crowd lowered I saw a young man
stagger back with his head split open, another boy with a broken nose,
a girl next to me had been kicked between the legs. People were badly
hurt and the atsmophere spun into a frightened panic. A friend of mine
from university who had come from Nottingham to join the camp just put
his head in his hands and cried. This was the scene, minutes after
people had been allowed to wander into the camp without any warning of
the planned police actions, or any chance to leave peacefully. As they
rolled in back up police and black armoured riot vans, and as the
police kicked and crushed people's bikes, the protesters called out to them, and the onlooking bankers, up in their ivory towers, 'This is not a riot!'. As their battons came down, Legal
Observors called out to people to take the police numbers of those who
had hurt protesters; on mass the line of police all covered up their
badges. It was a chilling show of a police unaccountable to their own
laws, and their own humanity. The police were indeed braced for
violence, but most of that young crowd of protesters were not.

Despite our repeated requests to be searched and allowed to leave the
space, we were held there for 6 hours with no access to water, food,
toilets or medical care. Proudly, throughout all this, not one person
in the crowd reacted with violence to any person or property. People
shared the little they had and held public meetings about the aims of
the G20 summit. There was little show of anger, but much unhappiness.
When finally we were herded out one by one at midnight, I felt cold to
the core, chilled by the unprovoked agression of those who I had been
brought up to trust. I am deeply ashamed of my state, when reasonable
and calm protesters are criminalised and provoked in such a manner.
Their use of section 14 on 800 campers was mindless, their violence
was a tragedy and their very presence, with armoured cars and
helicopters, a ridiculous waste of public money.

I am writing this today because I grew up in this city and treasure
the right to use this city space to speak out to our elected leaders
in a peaceful, creative way. There were no harmful intentions in that
climate camp, but the harm done by the police last night goes far
deeper that the physical wounds inflicted; it is in the chaos of
unnecessary state violence that fear is born and trust is lost.
Re: Police braced for more G20 violence against peaceful protesters
[info]dennis_mundo wrote:
Thursday, 2 April 2009 at 12:50 pm (UTC)
When I read your comment it read like written by someone who is quietly depressed about something that happened without any need whatsoever.
I once was treated by police in a brutal manner for no reason at all. I said to them at the time that I thought I was in Iran or some place like that. What followed were a couple of weeks of quiet thoughtfulness (feeling depressing) in which constantly the feeling flamed up that I had been treated unfairly (which it was as I discovered later by looking at the police law) and an erosion of trust in an institution that I never regarded as hostile.
Of course police is necessary in an organised state and society but we have to watch them. They must be, as a public institution, responsible and accountable. If they start feeling like a force of power that can move into a crowd of peaceful citizens who raise their arms and remove them using violence we must complain about that straight away. Politics and the law must look at that and deal with it.
I am sorry about your experience and I hope it will have consequences. If you can, and know how and through whom, take action.
G4
[info]sjkillman wrote:
Thursday, 2 April 2009 at 12:21 pm (UTC)
I was really pleased to see so many cameras taking photos - I hope the DWP can identify all those claiming benefit, but not available for work - perhaps they were the cowards with masks on.
Re: G4
[info]johnjjonz wrote:
Thursday, 2 April 2009 at 12:57 pm (UTC)
What about the cowards with the armour on?
Re: G20
[info]sjkillman wrote:
Thursday, 2 April 2009 at 02:12 pm (UTC)
Those with armour on risk their lives protecting my family and my freedoms. Go and use your energy to protest against the lack of education for women in Afghanistan, the lack of freedom of speech in North Korea, the mutilation of young girls' private parts in parts of Africa, the intolerance against gays in Iran.
Re: G20
[info]steve_wilds wrote:
Thursday, 2 April 2009 at 03:25 pm (UTC)
In what way were they protecting your family and freedoms? Was there any threat to either at these protests?

Re: G20
[info]sjkillman wrote:
Thursday, 2 April 2009 at 03:42 pm (UTC)
So you think those kicking in windows and daubing grafitti wont do it elsewhere? They let down the genuine protestors and should have been removed by the majority to save the police the hassle.
Re: G4
[info]drahcir38 wrote:
Thursday, 2 April 2009 at 02:34 pm (UTC)
Listen Donkey brain, do yourself a favour and have a look at the link posted earlier on by "movefreely". I did and I was absolutely shocked and fuming by the end. Once you have seen this you can be in no doubt that we truly do live in a police state, where the p[olice can do anything they want because there is no-one to challenge them and bring them to justice. And all you can comment on is people on benefit, you sad person.

http://www.britcit.co.uk/content/archives/2009/03/kingsnorth-report-reveals-shocking-police-campaign-of-intimidation-against-protesters.html
Re: G20
[info]sjkillman wrote:
Thursday, 2 April 2009 at 03:37 pm (UTC)
Verbal abuse and aggression - you must be male, under 40 and probably and educational drop-out.
Re: G20
[info]oldskald wrote:
Thursday, 2 April 2009 at 07:54 pm (UTC)
Smug idiocy, contempt for those you don't agree with, a willingness to live like a mushroom and soak up the lies you're fed... but I won't make any generalisations about who YOU are. I suspose you think that the police don't need to be bound by the same laws as the rest of us. Your comments remind me of a conversation with my former brother-in-law, a former serviceman, who remarked that he was disgusted that people went out on the streets and protested against military intervention, a military intervention he was part of "fighting to uphold our right to protest". He didn't see the contradiction, and I doubt you will either, but if you support freedom then sometimes you'll have to put up with hearing things you disagree with. It goes with the territory.

As for the police... I've met some ok coppers, no doubt professional and honest, but I've also had the opportunity to listen to a couple of off-duty coppers boasting about beating suspects using the language of 1980s football thugs. So fine, if you want to believe they're all shining paragons of law-abiding honesty that's up to you. But some of us remember Blair Peach, the SPG, Charles de Menezes, the West Midlands Serious Crime Squad, coppers selling drugs and fitting up the innocent in Stoke Newington nick, the Guildford Four, the Birmingham Six, the Bridgewater Three, the tactics used against May Day Protestors, Orgreave, Wapping, Grunwick. These are only a few examples, but there are many, many more...
Re: G20
[info]penny_reese wrote:
Thursday, 2 April 2009 at 08:44 pm (UTC)
Did you watch his link? Can you say that the people being harrased in this film were "threatening your family and freedoms"? If so, how?
Re: G20
[info]sjkillman wrote:
Friday, 3 April 2009 at 06:44 am (UTC)
If I had wanted to protest against the prevailing Government or institutions, I would want to set an example to my children on how to do so effectively. The last place I would go is on that march only to see people to cowardly covering up their faces (what are they ashamed of?) or thugs scrawling grafitti on walls, or bashing windows in. I absolutely agree that there are police who abuse the law as there are in every profession and walk of life. They should be dealt with harshly and I have no doubt all the photos taken on the day will root out those who do, and rightly so.
Re: G20
[info]oldskald wrote:
Thursday, 2 April 2009 at 09:13 pm (UTC)
And added to the adrenaline-fuelled police rampage in the City, this week we have the revelation that our fine, upstanding Mayor of London discussed beating up a journalist with his odious twerp of a mate, Darius Guppy. This is the Mayor, let us not forget, who is intimately involved in the policing of London. And did he try to discourage his convict friend? Hardly.

So are we surprised at this standard of policing in the capital when the Mayor of London has been involved in discussing violent action against a journalist who had the temerity to attempt to uncover illegality perpetrated by the "great and the good"? Hardly.

And lastly, I have to stress that I think that the vandalism of the RBS branch was stupid idiocy; an action guaranteed to justify police thuggery to the ignorant; and just plain wrong.
Re: G20
[info]sjkillman wrote:
Friday, 3 April 2009 at 06:49 am (UTC)
The vandalism clearly gave vicarious pleasure to those witnessing it, the grafitti has to be cleaned up with tax payers' money - I saw no thuggery by the police, only some idiot splashed with red dye trying to make a point.
Graffiti says it all about 'anarchists' and their vision of the new world
[info]paulallen08 wrote:
Thursday, 2 April 2009 at 12:26 pm (UTC)
Drop acid not bombs... only would have given an inkling of credit to this ludicrous statement had it continued with, 'and what-ever you do make sure it is not both at the same time'.
Climate Camp - Wednesday 19:04
[info]peacefulalways wrote:
Thursday, 2 April 2009 at 02:05 pm (UTC)
Climate Camp on Bishopsgate was an entirely peaceful protest, completely separate from G20 meltdown. But even before the police invoked powers to declare the protest illegal, batons where used to 'control' a passive crowd of people standing their ground for change.

No main stream news coverage will show this footage of police smashing through a peaceful and legal protest without provocation, cause or aim.

Offset This.

[or google indymedia and find the video in the newsfeed on the right.]
Re: Climate Camp - Wednesday 19:04
[info]liveotherwise wrote:
Thursday, 2 April 2009 at 02:36 pm (UTC)
Have to say that the police tactics work - there is no way I would join, or let my children join, a protest at the moment :(
Re: Climate Camp - Wednesday 19:04
[info]penny_reese wrote:
Thursday, 2 April 2009 at 08:52 pm (UTC)
I understand that. I wasn't at these, but having watched and read enough by those who were, I feel increasingly angry about the police behaviour. I feel the urge to dig out my old film of Ben Kingsley as Ghandi and watch those brave people walking peacefully up the police that were beating them for inspiration. Because at the next protests, I feel I need to show my support to these protestors by meeting police misbehaviour directly and challenging it peacefully before it becomes too late for this country.
gerrard 24
[info]gerrard18 wrote:
Thursday, 2 April 2009 at 02:24 pm (UTC)
mate love the comment abaout trustarians!! i work in the city in recruitment and have to wear a suit ( and still wore one yesterday) and it was like a bunch of uni drop- outs , wasters and generally c***s
who havn't got a clue that money does not grow on trees and most of us work really hard for it, whilst these mugs sit smoking weed all day talking s***.It was an excuse for bums to have a day out, not one single political objective would ever be acheived and it was all just gibberish from people who i pay to go to the dole que. i get taxed 40% so they can get pissed on a wenesday on their giro!! bunch of mugs for sure. I had to walk through a whole crown on bishopsgate in my suit and no one said anything so ive seen more violence at my neices playschool.I have to say i don't know what was funnier the state of these unwashed retards or the bankers trying to dress down in chinos and polo shirts -stuck out like sore thumbs !!lol I think all city workers should of worn bowler hats and a cane beacuse im not changing my dresscode for anyone ( this is a free country after all - which is the irony of it all)
People with peircings, people without...?
[info]mowfalmighty wrote:
Thursday, 2 April 2009 at 02:41 pm (UTC)
"There are all sorts of people inside. People with piercings, people without piercings, people with dogs - the sort of people you might expect to see at a pop festival. "
|hh right officer, So The sort of people you might also see at Tesco, the local library, etc

I did my own obeservation of the event, I would like to categorically state that I also saw ; People with tatoos, people without tatoos, people with hair, people without hair, people with hats, people without hats. ....

Policemen with half a brain, policeman with no brain.....the sort of people you see beating people up at demonstrations really
ack...
[info]franchise999 wrote:
Thursday, 2 April 2009 at 02:43 pm (UTC)
Damn hippies - they come in 2 forms, peace loving ones and, well, once with sticks.

"We have got officers here from evidence-gathering teams who have got photographs. It did take some time to enter the property so I suspect some people may have been able to leave."

Seriously? What ever happened to covering all entries/exits? Must remember that if I ever get busted for anything, pop out the back door/window and run run run away.

Silly people, all of them. The hippies, the police, the government, the punks, the.... Everyone except me :)

Sigh

Matthew Anderson
Founder of the non hippy franchise site
Testimony from the Climate Camp in Bishopsgate
[info]pixclicker wrote:
Thursday, 2 April 2009 at 05:01 pm (UTC)
As a supporter of legitimate public protest, I visited the Climate Camp (in front of the European Carbon Exchange in Bishopsgate) from 5.30 to 9.30 pm approx. and witnessed the peaceful nature of the people attending there. I also witnessed what appeared to me and others around me, as the heavy handed and downright aggressive nature of the policing of that protest, particularly as night fell. No press that we could see were in evidence to document the pincer movement of these police, which is a pity. The general public were not around and wave after wave of police vans and riot police moved in although no-one, I or anyone around me could see, was actually causing any disorder. Protesters were simply sitting around their tents, mostly young people, and the atmosphere was festive. Suddenly, the pavement was blocked off and people were stopped from entering or leaving without warning, though this is a public thoroughfare. A phalanx of padded police just swung into action after the main man looked at his watch. It was all choreographed, and these peaceful, sitting protestors were dealt with as if they had been violently rioting. Many of us bystanders explained to police that it was a peaceful protest, but to no avail. Having avoided being pinned down myself, I left with a heavy heart for the protestors and simmering anger at police tactics. This did not feel like a free country last night - once the press and general public were not in view - it is truly frightening to see the cold eye and authoritarian fist of those we are paying to govern us. So much media waffle attends the overpaid officials who banquet around the world and so little to the efforts and wishes of decent citizens whose money pays to keep the country running. Instead we watch, the scales dropping from our eyes, as they commit one blunder after the next. The words, What can we do?! were uttered with despair and a restless longing to act.
Ps: Before anyone asserts that those protesting are all unemployed or students - yes, some of them are, including myself - made unemployed last week, and some work part-time or had taken time off from work. Thankfully there are people who do have the time and more importantly, the inclination, to protest against injustice, in spite of the obvious danger to their liberty and subsequent privacy. Some people really put their necks out in pursuit of the greater good, and I am grateful for them. Remember the suffragettes, for example, villified and ridiculed in their time as well as countless other protestors whose action over the years has led to justified changes in legislation.
S.Nundy
Re: Testimony from the Climate Camp in Bishopsgate
[info]andym11 wrote:
Thursday, 2 April 2009 at 09:31 pm (UTC)
hi, if you have any picture or video examples of excessive police force please contact me via this group I am passing information to a human rights organisation which was observing the demonstration

http://www.facebook.com/posted.php?id=508548983&share_id=68318436313&nctrct=1238706440194#/group.php?gid=60467068334&ref=share
Re: Testimony from the Climate Camp in Bishopsgate
[info]sunday1morning wrote:
Friday, 3 April 2009 at 04:46 pm (UTC)
I agree, I have been appalled at the behaviour of the police on the entirely peaceful climate camp. The video footage of the attacks completely speaks for itself, the protesters did not fight back, all the footage is entirely of police attacking with batons and riot shields people with their hands in the air.

I am very angry that our police are allowed to behave like this, so i've made a decision...next time, for the first time in my life, I will be there with them. With a camera streaming video onto the net.
[info]andym11 wrote:
Thursday, 2 April 2009 at 09:26 pm (UTC)
w
This is a terrible article which does not tell the whole story
[info]andym11 wrote:
Thursday, 2 April 2009 at 09:29 pm (UTC)
I know the indy has had to cut staff and move in with the daily mail, but this report is an unacceptable pile of shit for a paper i normally have a lot of respect for. why don't you stop using press association morons who are unable to report the protests accurately and read an eyewitness account of how the police actually behaved here

An account of police violence here - please join this group and show solidarity for the peacful protestors badly treated by police
http://www.facebook.com/posted.php?id=508548983&share_id=68318436313&nctrct=1238706440194#/group.php?gid=60467068334&ref=share
The caption picture says it all.
[info]ancientoneuk wrote:
Thursday, 2 April 2009 at 09:56 pm (UTC)
I watched the news footage from a camera behind the police "push" and saw some outrageous actions of police brutality, the set of the policemens faces on many said it all, they were there for a fight and were willing to do anything to get one. I think that many people showed great restraint against the massed force of the police. What too is the law that exempts an officer from common assault as was seen so many times when they were violently in groups shoving and pushing people who were offering them no resistance?

The inset picture shows a woman being arrested for failing to be stopped and searched, now pardon me but I was under the impression that a male officer was not allowed to lay hands on a female except in exceptional circumstances such as preventing escape from the scene of a crime, this woman looks terrified, your tax money at work folks... and I for one would agree that if all she had the option of, was being groped by very aggressive and threatening officers or refusing and attempting to go ones way, I too would have told them to get knotted.

How many noticed today that many officers arranged their stab vests to cover their shoulder numbers?

And lastly, the above officer in the picture is a British Transport officer, isn't he a bit lost?
http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2009/apr/07/video-g20-police-assault
[info]fuckthenwo wrote:
Tuesday, 7 April 2009 at 07:21 pm (UTC)
Bring them to justice
[info]mightyfoot wrote:
Sunday, 19 April 2009 at 12:05 pm (UTC)
Should the Offending Police officers not be brought to justice? i think that they should also be named and shamed just as civilian offenders would have been?

We need to send a clear message to those in charge and those who have power that we will not tollorate this kind of behavior especially even more so from the ones we put our trust in?

I understand that the jobs they have to do are difficult but remember if it was you offending you would be punished by the courts and i don't think they should be allowed to get off with being reprimanded or even sacked they should get double the punishment that a civilian would receive regardless of weather they are following orders from their superiors.

This sort of behavior has to stop and we have to send a clear message to the ones we place our trust in that we will not allow them to get away with it.

Most popular

Article Archive

Day In a Page

Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat

Select date