James Lawton: Over to you, Boris
London's Mayor accepts the challenge to better Beijing
Monday, 25 August 2008
Reuters
Mayor of London Boris Johnson waves the Olympic flag after receiving it from IOC President Jacques Rogge during the closing ceremony of the Beijing 2008 Olympic Games
Something forlorn and regrettable happened here last night. The greatest Olympics we have ever seen, and perhaps ever will, quite unavoidably came to an end.
When they did it, it was hard not to feel a shiver of sympathy for Boris Johnson as he was handed maybe the heaviest baton ever passed on in the history of organised sport.
The Mayor of London, plainly conscious that he was standing in the gaze of the world, threw up so many hearty salutes to Olympic and Chinese government dignitaries, and even one young volunteer, that you worried he had mistaken the closing ceremony of the 29th Summer Games for a passing-out parade at Sandhurst. However, he accepted the Olympic flag with some reverence, carefully unfurling it before waving it in traditional fashion. And when old rocker Jimmy Page, east end pop star Leona Lewis, and Leytonstone native David Beckham emerged from a gleaming red London bus to cheers from 91,000 spectators in the Bird's Nest stadium, there was no doubt London had cleverly pitched its call to the stage as host of the 2012 Olympics.
Implicit in the eight-minute handover sequence was that if London was to succeed it would do so on its own terms – and its vastly inferior budget.
It couldn't make a better Games than Beijing, not in scale and staging and faultless organisation but it could be distinctively different, and, yes, maybe a little more relaxed in its welcome to the world as one of the great cosmopolitan cities.
None of this made it less of a wrench for anyone who loves sport to bid farewell to Beijing.
For two seamless weeks charged with drama and heart and sometimes terrible poignancy, along with 38 world and 85 Olympic records, sport, not just British sport – though it has been an exceptional case – found its soul again.
Everywhere you went you found competition that seemed to matter more than you could ever remember and that was true in every corner of the Games, not just the showpiece spectacles provided by the men of the Games, Jamaica's world-record shattering sprinter, Usain Bolt, and Michael Phelps, who employed his giant condor wingspan in his successful pursuit of a record eight gold medals in one Olympics – and a staggering accumulation of 14 in two Olympics, which made him, statistically at least, the greatest Olympian of all time.
Jacques Rogge, the Belgian president of the International Olympic Committee, was obliged, like all his predecessors to make grateful noises to the hosts when he stepped up to the microphone but, over the years, there has developed a form of presidential language carefully avoids comparing one Olympics to another. The old formula announcing the best-ever Olympics every four years was necessarily scrapped by Rogge's predecessor, Juan Antonio Samaranch, after the disaster of Atlanta in 1996, a grisly mix of crass commercialism and failed security. Four years ago, Rogge thanked Athens for "dream games", which covered everything, including huge budget overrides and the scandal of the Greeks' star sprinters running, literally, from drug testers.
Last night, though, Rogge was unambiguous in his praise of China's extraordinary effort to make great Games – and the astonishing response of the athletes of the world.
The IOC president declared: "Tonight we come to the end of 16 glorious days which we will cherish forever. Thank you to the people of China; through these Games, the world learned more about China, and China learned more about the world. Athletes from 204 National Olympic Committees came to these dazzling venues and awed us with their talent. These were truly exceptional games."
The lawyer from Brussels, an ex-Olympic rower, could have gone further, even for those of us weary of the years of double-speak and compromise and manipulation that that has so often marked Olympic politics.
He could have said that these were indeed the greatest Olympics of all time.
They were great for Britain, winning more medals and claiming more glory than at any time since the gas-lit Edwardian days of 1908, but they were also great for the idea of sport as something that can carry the mood of nations to another dimension.
Such must have been the hope of the watching, embattled Prime Minister, Gordon Brown, who – after west London boxer James DeGale landed Britain's 19th gold medal with a victory over Cuban Emilio Correa – might have been reflecting on the claim of his predecessor Harold Wilson that England's 1966 football World Cup victory had a crucial effect on a general election. Certainly, the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport, Andy Burnham, and Olympics minister, Tessa Jowell, have not been slow to claim credit for the extraordinary British success here, having donated £265m of lottery money to the Beijing campaign.
How much China spent on the Olympics, which ended with a breathtaking blaze of fireworks, almost certainly will never be disclosed, though the region of £20bn is one guess.
Nor will there be any easy settling of the argument about China's right to stage something which is supposed to be a shining festival of youth, despite a human rights record that provoked bitter protests from the moment the IOC awarded the Games to Beijing seven years ago.
For the moment though, such issues do little to abate the sense that, in sport at least, a precious time last night came to an end.
London, under the leadership of Olympic hero Sebastian Coe, may, against the odds, create a similar magical interlude in 2012, but it will take the most ferocious commitment and organisation and vision for London not to suffer by comparison with what has happened here.
What happened here was a reborn passion for the joy and the pain of competitive sport.
It is certainly no hardship to admit that during the past two weeks and a few days, no morning came that was too smoggy or humid or wet to take the edge off that question former Olympic champion Muhammad Ali immortalised in the simple phrase, "Who's gonna win, who's gonna win?"
Of course it was applied most to events such as the 100m dash of the beautiful and the usually damned, won so unforgettably by Bolt, and the swim that took Phelps to a unique place in Olympic sport and the latest classic instalment of the British rowing four's superb resilience, when the heirs of Sir Steven Redgrave and Matthew Pinsent fought back against the tough Australian boat to take still another gold, but it was also conjured in the strangest places. Places such as the ping pong hall and the beach volleyball arena.
Yes, beach volleyball, the absurd, bikini-clad sex ploy of the Olympics, pitted, of all nations, Georgia against Russia, and Georgia, with the help of their Brazilian mercenaries, won. China's women, who only discovered the game existed when they reached adulthood, fought in the sand against two former Californian beach children, Misty and Kerry, and stretched them to their limits in the gold medal match. The Americans were winning, just, their 108th straight match.
Everywhere, there was the compulsion of sport finding its best, and, maybe indeed its soul.
After Beijing, London no doubt faces a huge challenge. But it is a privilege, too.
The city will not want for a world eager to see more.
Have your say
Limit: 1000 characters
View all comments that have been posted about this article
Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP address logged and may be used to prevent further submissions. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by Independent.co.uk's Terms of Use
-
Print Article
-
Email Article
-
Click here for copyright permissions
Copyright 2008 Independent News and Media Limited

Comments
74 Comments
CAUGHT IN THE NET
NEWSWIRE--The bikinis worn in women's beach volleyball have become smaller so that they are less likely to retain beach sand.
The suits that let more skin be seen
Are best at voiding sand and particles.
And when they're shown in magazines,
I swear I only read the articles.
www.newsandverse.com
Light verse, ripped from the headlines
Posted by Kevin Pierce | 26.08.08, 12:30 GMT
Nice and flowery and not unpleasant to read but, from a sporting achievement perspective, not true. Michael Johnson himself said on the Beeb that this was not the best Olympics in athletics, with too few really competitive races. I guess he was disappointed with the USA's contribution, but I agree that it did not have me on the edge of my seat, as with past Olympics in track and field.
Worst of all, the Games were very much lacking in fun for the athletes, and inclusivity for the Chinese people. London's opening and closing ceremonies are already doomed to failure, by comparison, but at least the venues will be full and the smiles not forced.
Posted by nellie dean | 26.08.08, 10:17 GMT
To Sean @ 06:21. Most of the gold medals won by China had nothing whatever to do with judging, and in the judged events where China could have expected a clean sweep, if corrupt judging was the norm, there were some unexpected reverses, notably in the women's gymnastics (you speak as if you have carbon-dated the Chinese team yourself), where an American won the all-around gold, and the men's 10m platform diving, won by an Australian. I followed the Olympics very attentively and I do not recall hearing a single complaint about the quality or honesty of judging in any event, with the exception of some of the early boxing bouts (not involving Chinese competitors.)
As for your general anti-China rant, how can Chinese goods be "cheap" AND a "rip-off"? We hear a lot about the contrast between Western democracy and Chinese totalitarianism, but 1 million Brits marched through London against the Iraq war (equivalent to 20 million in Beijing) and failed to stop it. Power to the people!
Posted by Sceptic Islander | 26.08.08, 10:02 GMT
What a shock I had while watching the Final Ceremony of the Olympic Games! There were the well-dressed, smart-looking Chinese and Mr. Rogge. Then Mr Boris Johnson walked into the arena! I am a British Citizen living abroad and did not know that he is Major of London until I spoke to my parents who still live in England.
Mr Johnson was representing Great Britain, London 2012, in front of the World. At least David Beckham and Leona Lewis looked very smart, as always! Before he represents this country again perhaps somebody could help him buy a decent suit and help him to do the buttons up on his jacket!
Posted by Claire | 26.08.08, 08:55 GMT
Oh...and Mr or Ms Puki Maki: Whilst you obviously delight in the fact that China won the most Gold medals, please remember that they accomplished that with questionable judging from the sycophantic IOC and embryonic female Gymnasts.
Remember that their entire Sports Ministry is a huge machine that programs kids from the age of 4 to win at whatever cost.
It's OK to cheat, just as it's OK to sell toys covered in lead paint to poison our kids and pets, and also to rip-off the rest of the world.
The Chinese government may not make everyone wear Mao suits or quote the Little Red Book, but they're still Communists and oppress their citizenry just the same. They would kill us all if we no longer needed their cheap, crappy products.
Posted by Sean | 26.08.08, 06:21 GMT
...and this is the Mayor of the next city to host the Olympics? I was embarrassed at his appearance and the fact that he kept trying to put his hands somewhere, anywhere, other than by his side. At one point he even tried to put his hands INSIDE the waistband of his trousers. What's up with this guy??
Eccentric I can handle, but sloppy I cannot. I hope this isn't a taste of what to expect in 2012.
Posted by Sean | 26.08.08, 06:06 GMT
Boris once had to say 'sorry' to Liverpool for saying it 'wallowed in its victim status'. Where will he go when the gloss has worn off and he reflects upon his performance at the Olympics? Will he eat humble pie and resort to asking the (dignfied) Scousers to take him in? No one else would.
Posted by George S | 25.08.08, 20:50 GMT
I think a lot of people are being a bit hard on Bo Jo. He is a highly intelligent man whose somewhat-studied eccentricity is a key part of the popular appeal that took him from panel-show buffoon to Our Man in Beijing. Note no Ian Hislop. And, thank the Good Lord, no Ken Livingstone.
London will struggle to compete with Beijing. The reality of our capital city was only hinted at in the Stomp-inspired cliche we saw at the closing ceremony. Where were the black youths "steaming" down the bus (i.e. robbing people with menaces)? Where was the unlimited Friday night drunkenness, the streets covered with vomit and urine, the casual beatings and knifings that characterise the nation's night life? For years the British powers that be have been trying to promote "continental" drinking habits. It isn't going to happen as a result of the Olympic flag coming here. Advice for foreign visitors in 2012: stay sober, travel in a large group, don't carry much cash and wear a stab-proof vest.
Posted by Sceptic Islander | 25.08.08, 19:14 GMT
There is no need to have anything other than the simplest ceremonies. British taxpayers, most of whom will benefit in no way from the Olympics, are being asked to stump up enough money as it is for facilities, most of which are unneeded and will be as embarrassing to get rid of as the Millennium Dome. If the Olympics are about sport, then the focus should return to sport. Mr. Rogge and his team of busybodies should be told "No" when they make their outrageous demands.
The UK does not need the Olympics to "put it on the map" and most British are, thankfully, grown up enough not to care much about them one way or the other. Athletics are only of interest to small groups of people. The team sports were included at the request of NBC TV, who also decide on the event timetable. Time for a revolution, and for the UK to run the Olympics its own way, not the IOC's way. Those really interested might want to look at Mr. Rogge's compensation arrangements.
Posted by Simon Evans | 25.08.08, 18:55 GMT
What is "EXPECTED" of Changging "WORLD ORDER".
It is Very Difficult for an Average world's Citizen to Understand
leave aside Realizing the "LAW OF CONTINUAL CHANGE".
Ping-pong was invented by.....so....Life goes on without caring
who, what and When.....
Posted by Mohan.Dudani. | 25.08.08, 18:40 GMT
74 Comments