Long wait for succession rule to take effect
Friday 28 October 2011
The ancient rules of royal succession have handed men the balance of power for hundreds of years.
Women have still managed to accede to the throne, even becoming the country's longest-serving monarchs - Queen Victoria and the current Queen Elizabeth II.
But now, with the 15 other Commonwealth nations where the Queen is head of state backing the modernisation, first-born royal daughters in direct line to the throne will no longer be leapfrogged by their younger male siblings.
The radical shake-up to the way the monarchy works was spurred on by the marriage of the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge earlier this year.
If William and Kate's first child happens to be a girl, she will automatically become queen one day, regardless of whether she has a younger brother.
Yet it is still likely to be many years before another female monarch takes to the throne.
The Royal Family already has two generations of kings-in-waiting and the Queen is celebrating her Diamond Jubilee next year and in good health. Her own mother, the Queen Mother, lived to 101.
Heir apparent the Prince of Wales is next in line and then there is William, who has still to fulfil his regal duties before any child of his takes over.
Even then, William and Kate might have a son, meaning the nation would wait even longer to see the first royal daughter to benefit from the rule change.
But the fact that the laws will be updated brings an essential equality of the sexes to the British monarchy which did not exist before and which will in time change history.
As for the current members of the Royal Family, there will be no switching around.
Any new law is not expected to be retrospective - the Princess Royal would still be placed below her two younger brothers, the Duke of York and the Earl of Wessex.
For some, the changes do not go far enough.
Republic, which campaigns for a directly-elected ceremonial head of state, said they still failed the "equality test".
Campaign manager Graham Smith said: "In practice, it simply means that the eldest child of one family is preferred over all others. Inequality is therefore further entrenched in the system."
- 1 10 ways we damage our teeth – without realising
- 5 Photo of wedding guest proposing to girlfriend in front of bride and groom goes viral
Hopes raised for treatment of severe amnesia after scientists retrieve lost memory – using light
Playboy model April Summers speaks out about being a victim of a voyeuristic sex crime
Poorest part of London is wealthier than the richest parts of Northern Ireland and Wales
British tourists complain that impoverished boat migrants are making holidays 'awkward' in Kos
How to live to be really old
EU referendum: David Cameron's rules are a 'democratic disgrace', says French-born Scottish politician set to be denied a vote
SNP fury as HS2 finds 'no business case' for taking fast train service to Scotland
Australian man punched in the face for defending Muslim women from abuse on train
A nation of inequality: How the UK is failing to feed its most vulnerable people
David Starkey 'tells Amal Clooney to shut up and stop over-promoting human rights'
EU referendum: David Cameron to deny EU migrants and under-18s the chance to vote
£16000 - £18000 per annum: Recruitment Genius: One of the UK's leading Solar P...
£18000 per annum: Recruitment Genius: This organisation is changing the way at...
Negotiable: Recruitment Genius: A Digital Web Designer is required to join a f...
Negotiable: Recruitment Genius: This is a fantastic opportunity to develop an ...