UK

Rain (AM and PM) 7° London Hi 10°C / Lo 3°C

New evidence of police attacks on G20 victim

Eyewitness claims riot police assaulted newspaper seller three times before he died near protest

By Terri Judd

Ian Tomlinson is treated by medics after he collapsed during the G20 demonstration

GETTY IMAGES

Ian Tomlinson is treated by medics after he collapsed during the G20 demonstration

The Metropolitan Police faced fresh allegations of brutality last night after it emerged that a man who died at the G20 protests may have been attacked by riot police three times.

Ian Tomlinson was walking home from work when he was hit and pushed over by an officer in an apparently unprovoked attack. Minutes later the 47-year-old lay dying on a London street.

Last night, as it was revealed that the police officer concerned had come forward one week after the events, shocking new claims emerged that the violence meted out to Mr Tomlinson was even more severe than first thought.

A video had already emerged showing the newspaper seller being shoved forcefully to the ground by police as he walked with his hands in his pockets. But a photographer told The Independent that the incident was merely the third of a series of police attacks on Mr Tomlinson, before he died of a heart attack. Anna Branthwaite said that he had appeared desperate to get away during an earlier "unprovoked" attack in which police lashed at him with a baton. Last night, the Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC) announced it was taking over responsibility for a criminal investigation and was still trying to trace other officers involved. Mr Tomlinson's family said they were "shocked and sickened" by the video and would not rest until they had answers.

Ms Branthwaite told this newspaper how she witnessed two initial attacks further up the street as Scotland Yard's riot police swarmed the area.

"The dog handlers [believed to be City of London Police] were just starting to sweep the street and form a police line when Ian Tomlinson arrived. I saw a riot police officer charge him from behind and propel himself forward with his body weight," she said.

"Mr Tomlinson was on the ground and I saw him [the policeman] stand over him with a baton, hitting him twice. He was completely taken by surprise. He didn't know what hit him."

She added that he tried to get to his feet. "His natural instinct was to get up to run. The same riot police officer then grabbed him and ran with him for two strides and threw him forward." She then lost sight of Mr Tomlinson as she was hauled away by police. She was adamant that the filmed attack occurred seconds after the ones she witnessed. "He was not engaging with them [the police]. He was not taunting them. He was not shouting. It was completely unprovoked." Ms Branthwaite has made a statement to the IPCC, which will now pursue the investigation independently.

The shadow Home Secretary Chris Grayling described the revelations as "alarming" and said they left, "big questions to be answered by the police".

The gravity of the situation facing Scotland Yard was reflected in a statement yesterday by its Commissioner, Sir Paul Stephenson: "My thoughts are with Mr Tomlinson's family at this time. The images that have now been released raise obvious concerns and it is absolutely right and proper that there is a full investigation into this matter, which the Met will fully support."

Last night the IPCC revealed that a number of the officers caught up in the incident had yet to come forward. It is believed that the footage shows City of London Police dog handlers alongside members of the Metropolitan Police Tactical Support Group.

The IPCC also revealed that it had ordered a second post-mortem examination in an effort to determine if there was any external factor behind Mr Tomlinson's fatal heart attack.

Last night the family issued a statement that thanked the media for, "bringing crucial evidence to light".

Initially the Metropolitan Police spoke of how officers had on 1 April tried in vain to save Mr Tomlinson's life, claiming they had even been pelted with missiles, after he collapsed outside the Royal Exchange Building in the City. Investigators were told that there had been no contact with police before he collapsed.

But the story took on a very different turn when a New York fund manager passed film to The Guardian newspaper, which showed Mr Tomlinson being attacked from behind by an officer in riot gear as he walked away from them with his hands in his pockets.

Deborah Glass, of the IPCC, said the decision to take over the investigation from City of London Police was made after the video came to light. She said: "People are rightly concerned about this tragic death and this footage is clearly disturbing.

"This is a criminal investigation and we will, of course, be discussing it with the Crown Prosecution Service. At the moment the investigation is focused on identifying the officers in the footage. Several have already come forward and all efforts are being made to trace those who haven't."

The attack highlights concerns about police tactics during the demonstrations, during which 5,000 people gathered in the City to protest as the G20 political leaders prepared to meet.

Mr Tomlinson's son, Paul King, 26, said yesterday that the family were distraught. "It is very important for the sake of the family here and his kids, we just want justice.

"Until everything comes out and we have the right evidence, we cannot lay our father to rest."

On the night he died, the 47-year-old, known as Tommo to his friends, was on his way to the Lindsey Hotel, where he had lodged since October. Friends of Mr Tomlinson, a father of nine originally from Matlock, Derbyshire, described him as a man who had lived an itinerant lifestyle. The Home Secretary, Jacqui Smith, called for the IPCC inquiry to be completed "as quickly as possible". The Labour MP David Winnick, a member of the Home Affairs Select Committee, said questions will be asked about "misleading" police statements in the hours after Mr Tomlinson's death.

Police response to Ian Tomlinson's death

*1 April – Statement from the Metropolitan Police

A member of the public went to a police officer on a cordon to say that there was a man who had collapsed round the corner.

The officer sent two police medics through the cordon line where they found a man who had stopped breathing. They called for LAS [London Ambulance Service] support about 19.30. The officers gave him an initial check and cleared his airway before moving him back behind the cordon line to a clear area where they gave him CPR.

The officers took the decision to move him as during this time a number of missiles – believed to be bottles – were being thrown at them. LAS took the man to hospital where he was pronounced dead.

*4 April – Statement from the City of London Police

A post-mortem examination ... found he died of natural causes. [He] suffered a sudden heart attack while on his way home from work. The family thanked all the people who rushed to Ian's aid when he collapsed and said how grateful they are for all the efforts made to help.

*8 April – Statement Sir Paul Stephenson, Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police

My thoughts are with Mr Tomlinson's family at this time. The images that have now been released raise obvious concerns and it is absolutely right and proper that there is a full investigation into this matter, which the Met will fully support.

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

Page 1 of 2
<<[1] [2] >>
predictably tepid response over an innocent man's death
[info]vermeer76 wrote:
Thursday, 9 April 2009 at 01:41 am (UTC)
What a weak response from the government and the shadow minister. The officer in charge should be severely punished for this heinous and dishonourable act. Superiors should pay dearly as well. But have no fear, the excellent home minister is on the job. I'm SURE she'll get to the bottom of this!

And how dare this man's history be discussed - it is completely irrelevant! Is the independent trying to suggest that his "troubled history" was somehow related to his death?? Disgusting!
[info]alpha_sophia wrote:
Thursday, 9 April 2009 at 02:05 am (UTC)
If this kind of behaviour from the police continues, their job will become harder as more members of the public grow to distrust them.

Law-abiding citizens will become increasingly afraid of the police, and will not be willing to pass on information which could be used to cut crime.
Ian Tomlinson's death
[info]eatsee wrote:
Thursday, 9 April 2009 at 02:55 am (UTC)
as London has so many CCTVs, the IPCC should check and publicize the tapes recorded around the around with a view to allowing the public know what had happened before and after the police attack.
Re: Ian Tomlinson's death
[info]potwalloper wrote:
Thursday, 9 April 2009 at 06:09 am (UTC)
Unfortunately there is little doubt but that the police who have been investigating this crime will have already deleted the relevant scenes from those CCTV cameras. It will be like the CCTV at Stockwell station and on the train that were mysteriously 'not working' when Jean Charles De Menezes was shot dead in cold blood by the police, none of whom were held accountable.

Have no confidence that any evidence will now be intact - the police preserving such evidence would be like turkeys voting for Christmas.

Fear not the criminals and itinerants in society - instead fear the police. And be very very afraid...
Alleged Attack on Mr Tomlinson
[info]gallags wrote:
Thursday, 9 April 2009 at 03:06 am (UTC)
Perhaps we should spare the expense of a costly enquiry and just announce now that the police will not face any charges..as usual
Quickly Or Thoroughly
[info]dorseystock wrote:
Thursday, 9 April 2009 at 04:08 am (UTC)
Should the IPCC inquiry be completed as quickly, or as thoroughly as possible? And are we to assume, that as it has taken 7 days for the police officer in question to come forward that none of the officers that were with him were honest enough to give his name.

Well, I guess the criminal class protects it's own but what are we to do when the criminal class are those patroling our streets to supposedly keep us safe? It is quite clear these thugs were out for no more than a rumble on the streets. We need a thorough investigation into this network of dispicable filth and anyone involved in hiding evidence or perverting justice should be rooted out from the police force and face charges.

We hear about the anarchists causing mayhem but what about these uniformed criminals who were clearly out to subvert what was mostly peaceful demonstrations into a terrifying riot.

This tangled web of unpracticed deceit is completely unnacceptable. The law abiding people of Britain need to make a stand 'as quickly as possible' to show we will no longer accept the brutal lies of these hypocrites. We need to march again. It must be in peace. It must be now.
[info]andre_t wrote:
Thursday, 9 April 2009 at 05:40 am (UTC)
maybe he looked "muslim"
Your Comment
[info]impian wrote:
Thursday, 9 April 2009 at 04:23 pm (UTC)
Andre you are a "very stupid man" to put a comment on here saying he looked like a "muslim" what difference does that make whether or not he looked like a "muslim" once again I retirerate your are a very stupid man with no common sense whatsoever.
Re: Your Comment - [info]hitch2 - Thursday, 9 April 2009 at 09:53 pm (UTC) Expand
Re: Your Comment - [info]pontanus - Friday, 10 April 2009 at 01:22 pm (UTC) Expand
Re: Your Comment - [info]impian - Friday, 10 April 2009 at 04:10 pm (UTC) Expand
police collusion
[info]jeanshaw wrote:
Thursday, 9 April 2009 at 06:25 am (UTC)
Will all the Police officers involved be allowed to meet together to agree their stories as was the case with De Menezes vefore being interviewed
Re: police collusion
[info]lkdamo wrote:
Thursday, 9 April 2009 at 11:35 am (UTC)
I'm sure they already have their stories worked out, otherwise he wouldn't have come forward.
After one week all the cctv will be gone and the stories will be straight.
Considering the amount of police photographers all around the area and on top of buildings, aswell as all the cctv, the police could not find any image of any officer hitting the victim. I find that odd but not surprising.
Just like in Stockwell the evidence will be destroyed , but this time we all got to see what the the police can be really like from third party images and they can't take that away.

Re: police collusion - [info]potwalloper - Thursday, 9 April 2009 at 12:50 pm (UTC) Expand
What do we do about it?
[info]rojaws wrote:
Thursday, 9 April 2009 at 06:39 am (UTC)
Virtually everyone these days seems disgusted with our Police Force.
Anyone out there got any bright ideas what we (the public) can do about it?
This is a serious question.
Re: What do we do about it?
[info]lkdamo wrote:
Thursday, 9 April 2009 at 05:04 pm (UTC)
Well if you got all the students and other people with no future to break one of their stupid laws and then turn themselves in, it could cause havoc as the law is the law. If everyone did it then a criminal conviction wouldn't mean anything anymore. Administration nightmare in the making, a whole generation of peope with a criminal record, how do you discrimiate :D LOL
I know it's pie in the sky but if value your freedoms people have to think about doing stuff like that.

What's the point in having the right to protest if you don't have the right to disperse.
It's like having the right to freedom of movement, but not to stop in one place, what's the point.
These are legal truisms if you have the right to assembly you have the right to disperse, otherwise what's the point. It would be like going to Belsin as a protest, you can come and show your colours but you can't leave and you may die through no fault of your own or that of the other protesters.

What the police are doing is not legal and we are suposed to follow their example.
I would however beg that you do not follow the police example and only use legal methods to persue justice.
Re: What do we do about it? - [info]sir_john_bull - Thursday, 9 April 2009 at 09:32 pm (UTC) Expand
Nothing will happen
[info]jayoosi wrote:
Thursday, 9 April 2009 at 06:48 am (UTC)
Police in Britain get away with murder. They know that. If you have doubts, just ask the De Menzies family, and the Chelsea lawyer's family (who was shot several times). I'm waiting now for the Met's new story (naturally after the Met killers involved have several meetings to fabricate the new story).

I have been to several protests myself, and the police brutality shown can be compared to the behavior of police in some of the worst third-world countries. How shameful!
Above the Law
[info]corporatelies wrote:
Thursday, 9 April 2009 at 07:22 am (UTC)
Its clear that this case was looking to be covered up right from the start. why would the IPCC instruct the City of London Police to investigate their own? why has the BBC been keeping coverage of this to an absolute minimum? Why have the IPCC taken the police's own autopsy report as fact for a death in questionable circumstances? As the most monitored country on earth surely the first thing for any half assed investigation would be to put the public's concerns at rest by saying that cctv footage would be thoroughly examined but not a single peep about this but the repeated parroting of"we have received independent witness accounts of tomlinson having NO contact with the police blah blah".

this so called independent investigation is only going ahead because there is so much public outrage and not because they, the gov and IPCC, want to get to the bottom of this. And like i have already mentioned, this inquiry will guarentee that NO police officers will be jailed for this. It will find that tomlinson had a "pre condition" that meant it was a natural occurence and was NOT related to any other factors and that although the police may have been a little heavy handed they will reprimand the officer and put in place procedures and further training so that this will NEVER happen again, but please remember the police have a tough job to do and they were facing incredible pressure blah blah.

I should start putting bets on this prediction being a mirror image of what will eventually transpire. there is no justice in the UK anymore. the law is only there to oppress the poor and weak. justice is only for those who can afford it and those in power will do their utmost to ensure this remains the way. We should organise a mass protest outside number 10 and scotland yard to get those in power to make the UK a FUNCTIONING DEMOCRACY which we clearly ARE NOT! JUSTICE FOR ALL! NO MORE COVERUPS!!
Re: Above the Law
[info]potwalloper wrote:
Thursday, 9 April 2009 at 01:04 pm (UTC)
If you organise a mass protest then you will be the next one who the police kettle and then club to death. That is the real message that this government wants everyone to hear. Who would now let their children attend a protest like this where their lives could be at risk from violent thugs in uniform?
'functioning democracy' - [info]cronyblatcher - Thursday, 9 April 2009 at 03:05 pm (UTC) Expand
Re: Above the Law - [info]t_f_w - Thursday, 9 April 2009 at 03:21 pm (UTC) Expand
What about the others?
[info]courtaulds wrote:
Thursday, 9 April 2009 at 07:47 am (UTC)
The other officers didn't arrest the violent ones. Why not? Their task is to protect the public from thugs. In this case, they witnessed thuggery, and did nothing to stop it. All the police in that group must be purged from the force, surely? They stood by while a man was battered. Doesn't that qualify as terrorism?

effing disgrace
[info]mixmatosis wrote:
Thursday, 9 April 2009 at 08:13 am (UTC)
who polices the police?
Re: effing disgrace
[info]bonavent wrote:
Thursday, 9 April 2009 at 10:29 am (UTC)
What seems to be needed now is more, not less CCTV, so crimes can be cleared up - even police crimes!
Re: effing disgrace - [info]lkdamo - Thursday, 9 April 2009 at 11:38 am (UTC) Expand
the whole sorry affair
[info]essexmumof4 wrote:
Thursday, 9 April 2009 at 08:13 am (UTC)
my thoughts also go to the family of them man who dies. I have worked with many police officers in a vouluntary capacity as an independent custody visitor for several years but i was horrified to see the disgusting behaviour of some officers not just in the video but throughout the whole day. There were many unprovoked assaults on demonstraters ( yes there were also unprovoked attacks on police those who did that were arrested)What cannot be allowed to come from this is a further erosion of police and community relations. Thank god this was not a normal day and please god it will not be repeated. What must happen is though is those who did assault mr tomlinson must be prosocuted or at least disciplined
[info]oldlass wrote:
Thursday, 9 April 2009 at 09:13 am (UTC)
Did the fact that Mr. Tomlinson was wearing a Millwall t-shirt cause some members of the police that day react to him so much more strongly? No excuse whatsoever, but seem to remember that a while ago Millwall supporters did have a bit of a reputation with the police as being 'trouble'.
quite a change of position here
[info]bogzla wrote:
Thursday, 9 April 2009 at 09:20 am (UTC)
I note the tone of the independents reporting has changed considerably from the initial articles concerning the G20 protests. Pity it took the death of a man to instigate some proper journalism...
HOW ABOUT THE OTHERS.
[info]dkayedon wrote:
Thursday, 9 April 2009 at 09:23 am (UTC)
CAN WE GET TO ' RESPONSIBLE POLICING.' WHILE THIS policeMAN WAS HITTING OUT AND THEN PUSHING A GUY WALKING AWAY; Walking away from , FROM MEN WITH DOGS AND STICKS, WHO BY THE WAY, DID NOTHING; BUT WATCH.
WHY DID NOT THE POLICE ARREST THE ATTACKER WHO WAS BREAKING THE LAW. ? IS THIS SOMETHING TO DO WITH "GANG UNWRITTEN LAW OF NOT SQUEALING ON ONE'S MATES." THE SILLY JUVENILE BEHAVIOUR THAT GROUPS OF MALES GET INTO.?? (GIRLS ARE FOLLOWING FAST)
METROPOLITAN POLICE NEED TRAINING IN MATURITY OR LEARN FROM FORCES OUTSIDE.
OR HOW TO LIE BETTER.
THEIR "THOUGHT WERE WITH THE FAMILY"; BUT FIRST ON HOW TO SPIN AWAY
Shameful that the police lied about this
[info]fuchsiaperfect wrote:
Thursday, 9 April 2009 at 09:47 am (UTC)
It's dreadful enough that this police officer attacked Mr Tomlinson from behind, but then for the police to lie about coming under attack by the protesters when trying to administer first aid is shameful. It's lucky that there is video evidence of the assault, otherwise I'm sure it would have been covered up.

I'm not anti-police - the police in the small town where I live are great, and are part of the community - but it's obvious that some police officers aren't fit to wear the uniform.

One of the tabloids is already reporting that Mr Tomlinson is a homeless alcoholic who had been drinking before the attack - in my town, the police would have made sure he was OK, maybe even given him a lift home. OK, this wasn't possible here, but the man was harmless and posed no threat. Shame on the police officer who attacked him and took a week to come forward. Shame on the other officers who lied about the incident to try to cover up the assault.
Re: Shameful that the police lied about this
[info]theelectrician wrote:
Thursday, 9 April 2009 at 10:43 am (UTC)
The 'story' that Mr.Tomlinson was a homeless alcoholic who had been drinking was probably planted by the police themselves. In all cases like this, the tabloids (and sometimes the 'quality' newspapers) very quickly produce stories that denigrate the victims of police action and are usually lies or unjustified exaggeration of a minor truth. It's standard operational procedure.
Re: Shameful that the police lied about this - [info]fuchsiaperfect - Thursday, 9 April 2009 at 03:31 pm (UTC) Expand
How It Is Now.
[info]delorean_fogg wrote:
Thursday, 9 April 2009 at 09:48 am (UTC)
Anyone noticed the ramping up of powerlessness we are being force fed? From a brutal Stassi police force to a greedy, corrupt political elite - (you'd swear I was talking about some Eastern European state in the '70s or Chile or Argentina or .....) They want these images of innocent bystanders being beaten mercilessly to be played repeatedly and on all media. They want you to see how it is now. A few token police may be repremanded, perhaps, but the job has been done. More seeds of control have been planted. Fear of the System has been further embedded in our consciousness. Police beat you up and polititians take your money. Simple stuff. This is how it is now.
Dogs are scary
[info]fish_1 wrote:
Thursday, 9 April 2009 at 09:57 am (UTC)
If I was there watching those dogs i would have an attack myself. Is it really necessary to behave like men chasing animals?
time to act! repeal law to decriminalize police photographs
[info]necromansor wrote:
Thursday, 9 April 2009 at 10:29 am (UTC)
You scratch my back and I scratch yours has gone far enough. The police and the politicians are acting against the law with impunity. Anyone who has watched the video knows that the police are in violation of the law. Its time the tyrannical law to criminalize the act of taking pictures of police constables be repealed.

Don't be taken for granted.
Re: time to act! repeal law to decriminalize police photographs
[info]linchung wrote:
Friday, 10 April 2009 at 09:53 am (UTC)
Too Right!

I'll bet the only salient reason that statute was so quietly enacted was to enable the Police "Service" to carry out human rights abuses with impunity during the G20 legal protests: you can see that on the Channel 4 footage, as the police, rather than helping the public aid Mr Tomlinson, cordon him off and then cover their faces!!

So, you have nothing to fear if you have nothing to hide, eh?
Bastards
[info]sharksharp wrote:
Thursday, 9 April 2009 at 11:00 am (UTC)
I know all about these so called public protectors. Being originally from outside of UK, I have experienced police cruelty and total unfairness from police, and namely Rebecca Rapier, based in Covent Garden police station. Usually they act all cool and mighty until they realise I have law education and always take actions against any such cruelty. I can say that even more it is a plesure to hit them back, because out of my personall experience even the biggest UK cops are weak, as long as you r not afraid of bastards but the most plesure is when they are alive and stand in the court room in front of you, listening to the sentence, being stripped of all ranks, awards and all.
thirld world policing
[info]king_lalibela wrote:
Thursday, 9 April 2009 at 11:27 am (UTC)
this is exactly how the police behave in third world countries - they brutally silence peaceful demonstrators and lie about it in the media; and to the rest of the world. It makes me very sad to see it here in the UK because I was of the belief that the British police valued democracy, and preferred to work with and for the people, and not against them :(
The answere from the Police will be....
[info]lkdamo wrote:
Thursday, 9 April 2009 at 11:55 am (UTC)
You see to be "fair and balanced" as is the whim of the BBC right now for example,
if you play the footage backwards, you will clearly see the Police officer helping Mr Tomlinson to his feet.
This logic will be accepted and that will be the verdict.
Or else Hell might freeze over and we don't want that to happen do we?

Also the mention of Mr Tomlinson's past in this article is beyond me.
Plus it's based on what "friends" said, which is a eufamism for some bloke that saw him in a pub once.
Have you no shame?
This is the internet , so can someone edit that please, it's disgusting.
Above the law
[info]stimparavane wrote:
Thursday, 9 April 2009 at 12:15 pm (UTC)
The aftermath of Stockwell is allowing the police to increasingly believe they are above the Law.
How many?
[info]frogabi wrote:
Thursday, 9 April 2009 at 01:02 pm (UTC)
How many people killed by police to date? How many police in jail for murder or manslaughter? Those who killed de Menezes, those who killed the chap in Guilford, all of those whose murders were not even reported because their victims were the baddies, criminals, they go unpunished yet there is zero tolerance for those who slip out of mainstream society.
The British should be a bit more concerned about this and demand justice, proper justice, not the charade that happens everytime there is an enquiry. No doubt those responsible for this will not be charged with anything, they will not pay for their crime because they are above the law, which it seams was created to apply only to the people, not the government's personal army. Isnt it about time you learned something from the French and stood up for your rights and the rights of all of those in the country?
Clamp Down
[info]justanotherno wrote:
Thursday, 9 April 2009 at 09:37 pm (UTC)
And although we have power in comment. This is being threatened as well. Please read:

European Data Retention Directive comes into effect today 6 Apr 09,

http://channel.hexus.net/content/item.php?item=17954
Page 1 of 2
<<[1] [2] >>

Most popular

Article Archive

Day In a Page

Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat

Select date