New evidence of police attacks on G20 victim
Eyewitness claims riot police assaulted newspaper seller three times before he died near protest
The Metropolitan Police faced fresh allegations of brutality last night after it emerged that a man who died at the G20 protests may have been attacked by riot police three times.
Ian Tomlinson was walking home from work when he was hit and pushed over by an officer in an apparently unprovoked attack. Minutes later the 47-year-old lay dying on a London street.
Last night, as it was revealed that the police officer concerned had come forward one week after the events, shocking new claims emerged that the violence meted out to Mr Tomlinson was even more severe than first thought.
A video had already emerged showing the newspaper seller being shoved forcefully to the ground by police as he walked with his hands in his pockets. But a photographer told The Independent that the incident was merely the third of a series of police attacks on Mr Tomlinson, before he died of a heart attack. Anna Branthwaite said that he had appeared desperate to get away during an earlier "unprovoked" attack in which police lashed at him with a baton. Last night, the Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC) announced it was taking over responsibility for a criminal investigation and was still trying to trace other officers involved. Mr Tomlinson's family said they were "shocked and sickened" by the video and would not rest until they had answers.
Ms Branthwaite told this newspaper how she witnessed two initial attacks further up the street as Scotland Yard's riot police swarmed the area.
"The dog handlers [believed to be City of London Police] were just starting to sweep the street and form a police line when Ian Tomlinson arrived. I saw a riot police officer charge him from behind and propel himself forward with his body weight," she said.
"Mr Tomlinson was on the ground and I saw him [the policeman] stand over him with a baton, hitting him twice. He was completely taken by surprise. He didn't know what hit him."
She added that he tried to get to his feet. "His natural instinct was to get up to run. The same riot police officer then grabbed him and ran with him for two strides and threw him forward." She then lost sight of Mr Tomlinson as she was hauled away by police. She was adamant that the filmed attack occurred seconds after the ones she witnessed. "He was not engaging with them [the police]. He was not taunting them. He was not shouting. It was completely unprovoked." Ms Branthwaite has made a statement to the IPCC, which will now pursue the investigation independently.
The shadow Home Secretary Chris Grayling described the revelations as "alarming" and said they left, "big questions to be answered by the police".
The gravity of the situation facing Scotland Yard was reflected in a statement yesterday by its Commissioner, Sir Paul Stephenson: "My thoughts are with Mr Tomlinson's family at this time. The images that have now been released raise obvious concerns and it is absolutely right and proper that there is a full investigation into this matter, which the Met will fully support."
Last night the IPCC revealed that a number of the officers caught up in the incident had yet to come forward. It is believed that the footage shows City of London Police dog handlers alongside members of the Metropolitan Police Tactical Support Group.
The IPCC also revealed that it had ordered a second post-mortem examination in an effort to determine if there was any external factor behind Mr Tomlinson's fatal heart attack.
Last night the family issued a statement that thanked the media for, "bringing crucial evidence to light".
Initially the Metropolitan Police spoke of how officers had on 1 April tried in vain to save Mr Tomlinson's life, claiming they had even been pelted with missiles, after he collapsed outside the Royal Exchange Building in the City. Investigators were told that there had been no contact with police before he collapsed.
But the story took on a very different turn when a New York fund manager passed film to The Guardian newspaper, which showed Mr Tomlinson being attacked from behind by an officer in riot gear as he walked away from them with his hands in his pockets.
Deborah Glass, of the IPCC, said the decision to take over the investigation from City of London Police was made after the video came to light. She said: "People are rightly concerned about this tragic death and this footage is clearly disturbing.
"This is a criminal investigation and we will, of course, be discussing it with the Crown Prosecution Service. At the moment the investigation is focused on identifying the officers in the footage. Several have already come forward and all efforts are being made to trace those who haven't."
The attack highlights concerns about police tactics during the demonstrations, during which 5,000 people gathered in the City to protest as the G20 political leaders prepared to meet.
Mr Tomlinson's son, Paul King, 26, said yesterday that the family were distraught. "It is very important for the sake of the family here and his kids, we just want justice.
"Until everything comes out and we have the right evidence, we cannot lay our father to rest."
On the night he died, the 47-year-old, known as Tommo to his friends, was on his way to the Lindsey Hotel, where he had lodged since October. Friends of Mr Tomlinson, a father of nine originally from Matlock, Derbyshire, described him as a man who had lived an itinerant lifestyle. The Home Secretary, Jacqui Smith, called for the IPCC inquiry to be completed "as quickly as possible". The Labour MP David Winnick, a member of the Home Affairs Select Committee, said questions will be asked about "misleading" police statements in the hours after Mr Tomlinson's death.
Police response to Ian Tomlinson's death
*1 April – Statement from the Metropolitan Police
A member of the public went to a police officer on a cordon to say that there was a man who had collapsed round the corner.
The officer sent two police medics through the cordon line where they found a man who had stopped breathing. They called for LAS [London Ambulance Service] support about 19.30. The officers gave him an initial check and cleared his airway before moving him back behind the cordon line to a clear area where they gave him CPR.
The officers took the decision to move him as during this time a number of missiles – believed to be bottles – were being thrown at them. LAS took the man to hospital where he was pronounced dead.
*4 April – Statement from the City of London Police
A post-mortem examination ... found he died of natural causes. [He] suffered a sudden heart attack while on his way home from work. The family thanked all the people who rushed to Ian's aid when he collapsed and said how grateful they are for all the efforts made to help.
*8 April – Statement Sir Paul Stephenson, Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police
My thoughts are with Mr Tomlinson's family at this time. The images that have now been released raise obvious concerns and it is absolutely right and proper that there is a full investigation into this matter, which the Met will fully support.
View all comments that have been posted about this article.
Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.
- Print Article
- Email Article
-
Click here for copyright permissions
Copyright 2009 Independent News and Media Limited


Comments
And how dare this man's history be discussed - it is completely irrelevant! Is the independent trying to suggest that his "troubled history" was somehow related to his death?? Disgusting!
Law-abiding citizens will become increasingly afraid of the police, and will not be willing to pass on information which could be used to cut crime.
Have no confidence that any evidence will now be intact - the police preserving such evidence would be like turkeys voting for Christmas.
Fear not the criminals and itinerants in society - instead fear the police. And be very very afraid...
Well, I guess the criminal class protects it's own but what are we to do when the criminal class are those patroling our streets to supposedly keep us safe? It is quite clear these thugs were out for no more than a rumble on the streets. We need a thorough investigation into this network of dispicable filth and anyone involved in hiding evidence or perverting justice should be rooted out from the police force and face charges.
We hear about the anarchists causing mayhem but what about these uniformed criminals who were clearly out to subvert what was mostly peaceful demonstrations into a terrifying riot.
This tangled web of unpracticed deceit is completely unnacceptable. The law abiding people of Britain need to make a stand 'as quickly as possible' to show we will no longer accept the brutal lies of these hypocrites. We need to march again. It must be in peace. It must be now.
After one week all the cctv will be gone and the stories will be straight.
Considering the amount of police photographers all around the area and on top of buildings, aswell as all the cctv, the police could not find any image of any officer hitting the victim. I find that odd but not surprising.
Just like in Stockwell the evidence will be destroyed , but this time we all got to see what the the police can be really like from third party images and they can't take that away.
Anyone out there got any bright ideas what we (the public) can do about it?
This is a serious question.
I know it's pie in the sky but if value your freedoms people have to think about doing stuff like that.
What's the point in having the right to protest if you don't have the right to disperse.
It's like having the right to freedom of movement, but not to stop in one place, what's the point.
These are legal truisms if you have the right to assembly you have the right to disperse, otherwise what's the point. It would be like going to Belsin as a protest, you can come and show your colours but you can't leave and you may die through no fault of your own or that of the other protesters.
What the police are doing is not legal and we are suposed to follow their example.
I would however beg that you do not follow the police example and only use legal methods to persue justice.
I have been to several protests myself, and the police brutality shown can be compared to the behavior of police in some of the worst third-world countries. How shameful!
this so called independent investigation is only going ahead because there is so much public outrage and not because they, the gov and IPCC, want to get to the bottom of this. And like i have already mentioned, this inquiry will guarentee that NO police officers will be jailed for this. It will find that tomlinson had a "pre condition" that meant it was a natural occurence and was NOT related to any other factors and that although the police may have been a little heavy handed they will reprimand the officer and put in place procedures and further training so that this will NEVER happen again, but please remember the police have a tough job to do and they were facing incredible pressure blah blah.
I should start putting bets on this prediction being a mirror image of what will eventually transpire. there is no justice in the UK anymore. the law is only there to oppress the poor and weak. justice is only for those who can afford it and those in power will do their utmost to ensure this remains the way. We should organise a mass protest outside number 10 and scotland yard to get those in power to make the UK a FUNCTIONING DEMOCRACY which we clearly ARE NOT! JUSTICE FOR ALL! NO MORE COVERUPS!!
WHY DID NOT THE POLICE ARREST THE ATTACKER WHO WAS BREAKING THE LAW. ? IS THIS SOMETHING TO DO WITH "GANG UNWRITTEN LAW OF NOT SQUEALING ON ONE'S MATES." THE SILLY JUVENILE BEHAVIOUR THAT GROUPS OF MALES GET INTO.?? (GIRLS ARE FOLLOWING FAST)
METROPOLITAN POLICE NEED TRAINING IN MATURITY OR LEARN FROM FORCES OUTSIDE.
OR HOW TO LIE BETTER.
THEIR "THOUGHT WERE WITH THE FAMILY"; BUT FIRST ON HOW TO SPIN AWAY
I'm not anti-police - the police in the small town where I live are great, and are part of the community - but it's obvious that some police officers aren't fit to wear the uniform.
One of the tabloids is already reporting that Mr Tomlinson is a homeless alcoholic who had been drinking before the attack - in my town, the police would have made sure he was OK, maybe even given him a lift home. OK, this wasn't possible here, but the man was harmless and posed no threat. Shame on the police officer who attacked him and took a week to come forward. Shame on the other officers who lied about the incident to try to cover up the assault.
Don't be taken for granted.
I'll bet the only salient reason that statute was so quietly enacted was to enable the Police "Service" to carry out human rights abuses with impunity during the G20 legal protests: you can see that on the Channel 4 footage, as the police, rather than helping the public aid Mr Tomlinson, cordon him off and then cover their faces!!
So, you have nothing to fear if you have nothing to hide, eh?
if you play the footage backwards, you will clearly see the Police officer helping Mr Tomlinson to his feet.
This logic will be accepted and that will be the verdict.
Or else Hell might freeze over and we don't want that to happen do we?
Also the mention of Mr Tomlinson's past in this article is beyond me.
Plus it's based on what "friends" said, which is a eufamism for some bloke that saw him in a pub once.
Have you no shame?
This is the internet , so can someone edit that please, it's disgusting.
The British should be a bit more concerned about this and demand justice, proper justice, not the charade that happens everytime there is an enquiry. No doubt those responsible for this will not be charged with anything, they will not pay for their crime because they are above the law, which it seams was created to apply only to the people, not the government's personal army. Isnt it about time you learned something from the French and stood up for your rights and the rights of all of those in the country?
European Data Retention Directive comes into effect today 6 Apr 09,
http://channel.hexus.net/content/item.p