Prince Charles letters: Attorney General's block ruled unlawful
The ruling was the latest in a nine-year attempt to make letters between the Prince and ministers public
Cahal Milmo is the chief reporter of The Independent and has been with the paper since 2000. He was born in London and previously worked at the Press Association news agency. He has reported on assignment at home and abroad, including Rwanda, Sudan and Burkina Faso, the phone hacking scandal and the London Olympics. In his spare time he is a keen runner and cyclist, and keeps an allotment.
Wednesday 12 March 2014
The Attorney General is to appeal to Britain’s highest court after suffering a comprehensive defeat in his attempts to prevent letters written by Prince Charles to ministers being made public.
Dominic Grieve, the Government’s chief legal adviser, was told yesterday by the Court of Appeal that his decision to veto a ruling by a tribunal that the letters should be published was “unlawful” and contrary to both British and European law.
The ruling was the latest twist in a nine-year battle by The Guardian newspaper to force the disclosure of communications between the heir to the throne and ministers on the grounds that any attempts by the prince to influence government policy or decisions should be subject to public scrutiny.
Journalist Rob Evans won a ruling in 2012 by the Upper Tribunal of the Information Commissioner, a High Court body which sits on Freedom of Information (FOI) Act disputes, that it was in the public interest that the letters written to seven Whitehall departments between 2005 and 2006 to be disclosed.
But Mr Grieve then used his powers under the FOI Act to issue a “certificate” annulling the Upper Tribunal ruling and saying the departments had been legally entitled to refuse disclosure because the correspondence was part of the prince’s “preparation for becoming king”.
The letters were said to contain the prince’s “most deeply-held personal views and beliefs”, and their disclosure would “seriously damage” his ability to perform his duties as king because of the doubt it would cast on his political neutrality, according to Mr Grieve.
The Master of the Rolls, Lord Dyson, yesterday overturned that decision, saying that Mr Grieve had had “no reasonable grounds” for deciding to issue the certificate and it had been unlawful to do so under both British and European rules.
Despite the setback for the Government, the battle will continue after Mr Grieve said he will appeal the ruling to the Supreme Court, Britain’s highest court.
In a statement, the Attorney General said: “We are very disappointed by the decision of the court. We will be pursuing an appeal to the Supreme Court in order to protect the important principles which are at stake in this case.”
- 1 Michael Douglas regrets 'embarrassing' Catherine Zeta-Jones with oral sex comments
- 2 Tunisia hotel attack: Locals form 'human shield' to protect hotel from gunman Seifeddine Rezgui
- 3 Tunisian builder has been hailed a hero after knocking gunman to the ground with roof tiles
- 4 German ethics council calls for incest between siblings to be legalised by Government
- 5 Fifty Shades of Grey author E.L James's Twitter Q&A didn't go exactly as planned
Kim Jong-un shows off airport designed by architect he likely had executed
Michael Douglas regrets 'embarrassing' Catherine Zeta-Jones with oral sex comments
Tunisia hotel attack: Locals form 'human shield' to protect hotel from gunman Seifeddine Rezgui
Greece debt crisis: Athens has one day to find €1.6bn
German ethics council calls for incest between siblings to be legalised by Government
The moment a Queen's Guard soldier lost it and drew his gun at annoying tourist
Greece crisis: The wider lesson is that it’s time to abandon this failed experiment in currencies
'I wish the BBC would stop calling it Islamic State' – David Cameron unleashes frustration at broadcaster
Extend Right To Buy to tenants of private landlords, Labour's Jeremy Corbyn says
David Cameron struck double blow in his hopes to win Britain a new EU deal
Pentagon accuses Russia of 'playing with fire' over nuclear threats towards Nato
£15500 - £17000 per annum: Recruitment Genius: This international company deve...
£16000 - £27000 per annum: Recruitment Genius: This established name in IT Ser...
£33000 - £38000 per annum: Recruitment Genius: A global player and world leade...
£19000 - £25000 per annum: Recruitment Genius: A fantastic opportunity has ari...