Prison or death: the choice facing editor with a hotline to the Real IRA
Journalist tells court she fears for her life if she is forced to hand over information about paramilitaries
PA
Suzanne Breen, centre, and the editor of the Sunday Tribune, Noirin Hegarty, at Laganside Courts in Belfast
A journalist told a court yesterday that she faced being assassinated by republican terrorists if she complied with a police demand to hand over notes which could identify members of the Real IRA.
Suzanne Breen, the Belfast-based northern editor of the Sunday Tribune, received the Real IRA claim of responsibility for the murders of Sappers Mark Quinsey and Patrick Azimkar, who were killed at the gates of Massereene barracks in Antrim on 7 March. She later conducted an interview with a member of the group.
Police are demanding under the Prevention of Terrorism Act that she hand over her computer, telephones, notes and any other material relating to two stories she wrote about the Real IRA in the wake of the killings.
If the court rules that she must hand over the notes and she refuses, she faces being sent to prison for five years.
Ms Breen told the Belfast Recorders Court that the dissident republicans would regard any co-operation by her as an "act of collaboration" with British forces. Her legal team said her right to life under the European Convention on Human Rights had to be respected.
She said the Real IRA was "more than capable" of murdering her and her family if she co-operated. She said a contact connected to the Real IRA had told her: "You know what co-operation with the PSNI means."
She said the message could only represent a death threat to her and her family and she was not prepared "to place my life at risk and that of my 14-month-old child and my partner".
In an article, Ms Breen said: "I face up to five years imprisonment for not complying with police demands. I believe the PSNI's action is politically motivated. The force is under huge pressure to be seen to be doing something post-Massereene. It's much easier to go after the messenger than those behind the message. Another objective could be to discourage other journalists from covering controversial stories and interviewing republican dissidents." Ms Breen told the court that the National Union of Journalists code of conduct made it clear that confidentiality for sources should always be protected. "Our job is to gather information and put it in the public domain," she said.
A campaign in support of her refusal to hand over material has grown in recent weeks with hundreds of journalists, academics and figures in the arts signing a petition organised by the National Union of Journalists.
Prominent journalists including the former Mirror editor Roy Greenslade, BBC Panorama's John Ware and the Sunday Times journalist Liam Clarke have given evidence for Ms Breen.
Ms Breen's case has wider ramifications for press freedom. Amnesty International has written to the Northern Ireland Secretary, Shaun Woodward, expressing "serious concerns" about the case, which it said highlighted the risks to investigative journalism.
Patrick Corrigan, Amnesty's Northern Ireland director, said: "There are concerns here about possible violation of Suzanne Breen's human rights. By using anti-terrorism legislation and the use of secret evidence, the government has deprived her of the right to challenge evidence used against her."
Judge Tom Burgess, the Recorder for Belfast, is to deliver his ruling next week. Colin Duffy, a dissident republican from Lurgan, Co Armagh, has been charged with killing the two soldiers.
View all comments that have been posted about this article.
Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.
- Print Article
- Email Article
-
Click here for copyright permissions
Copyright 2009 Independent News and Media Limited


Comments
Having one rule for them, and another rule for us, is the Death of the System though, is it not, and it will be interesting to read of the precedents which may be set as the Media Players in the Charade dodge telling what they know happened for speculation on what may have happened.
Which is a Crazy State of Affairs which would be Instrumentally Supportive of Anarchy and Terrorism.
J'accuse.
Go watch the film 50 Dead Men and see what British "protection" does for those it gets help from, this woman has very real reason to be fearful.
My late mother was a codetaker for the Times for many years and it puts the whole family under the spotlight, especially when those giving the codes exhibit a great intelligence network, it all comes down to the fact that the British government and the Provos are still playing cowboys and indians and never mind the human cost.
Like many journalists she is making a living out of reporting the death and misery of others but now the same has been brought to her door, by her own actions, we are supposed to treat her differently. If these people aren't jailed they will most likely kill again, perhaps another Omagh and if that happens the police will be lambasted for inactivity.
The press are quick to shout about the double standards of others but they are quiet when it comes to their own kind. This woman took a 'sexy' story onboard to help make a name for herself and now it has come back to bite her, she brought this on her own head.
Funny isn't it how Western Europe's two Catholic countries have this kind of sick organized crime? Perhaps the Pope forgot to tell them it is not nice to kill people for money?
Real IRA or no Real IRA, that is a universal principle upheld by all journalists and I hope all journalists, via their professional bodies, will support Ms. Breen in the stand she is taking.
But it is subject to being abused. It is a risk worth taking.
What I cannot understand is the stand taken by this particular journalist, Suzanne Breen: "I cannot comply with police demands that I give away my source for fear of death to me and my family".
Does that mean that if she did not fear for herself and her family she would give away her notes?
She should have said: "I won't give away my notes, because I must protect my sources", full stop. And go to jail if need be. It is unfortunate she did not and may, indeed, put her and her family at risk if the criminals see her as weak, and half-willing to denounce them.
About bringing the criminals to justice, it is the police's job, and they have means to solve crime without pressuring a journalist. Use of informants, surveillance etc. Let's hope that they do succeed, using legal means and not by threatening our liberty of being informed.
They may well be looking to solve murders here but it is very, very selective with many deaths still being blind-eyed by the police over there because they know who did it...
www.millarcrime.com
When police ask you, ?You have to repot every morning before you wake and every night before you sleep. ? You better do not sleep. Heard of the bank thieves who were lifted in the middle of the night taken to USA and Tony Blaire did not raise an eyebrow, he was sleeping fast in the drunk state like the Aladdin finding the treasures.
Do you expect to come and bail you out from this mess? No madam I am afraid of the Police. Did you see how they kicked the man in the street and he died on the day there was a small meeting when many broke the glass of RBS and police started the combing the streets hitting all with the truncheons right left and on heads. I was lucky I got this on the brain.
I thank you
Firozali A. Mulla
As a journalist/editor Ms. Breen obviously knew about the possible ramifications of conducting an interview with the terrorist(s). To use her life and the life of her family as justification for remaining silent "after-the-fact" peverts justice in the name of publishing a good story.
To be quite honest, it is Ms. Breen her self who endangered her family by pursuing the story, then publishing the story, then remaining silent. Too often journalists blur the line between journalism and crime solving. This is another example.
The facts should be released and the suspects tried with the utmost concern for Ms. Breen and her family.
Graham, Montreal, Canada