Radical plan to break up English Heritage ‘rushed’ and ‘not viable’
Nick Clark is the arts correspondent of The Independent. He joined the newspaper in June 2007, initially reporting on the stock markets. He has covered beats including the City, and technology, media and telecoms and made the switch to arts in December 2011. He has also contributed articles to the sports section.
Monday 17 March 2014
Serious questions have been raised over the Government’s plans to split English Heritage in two, after a lengthy consultation provoked a flood of angry responses.
Close to 600 replies were received in response to the radical plan, which would see English Heritage become an independent charity responsible solely for the management of 440 historical sites including Stonehenge, Hadrian’s Wall and Tintagel Castle. The rest of the organisation’s operations would remain with the Government and be renamed Historic England.
An early analysis of the responses, seen by The Independent, shows that the Government is facing a long string of fears, queries, requests and demands from organisations ranging from heritage bodies to developers and local authorities.
The proposal in its current form “does not give confidence”, one respondent said. Another criticised the plans as “hurriedly developed” and said that many of the financial assumptions were “unconvincing”. Another demanded a “more imaginative vision”. The Council for British Archaeology said the consultation had been “rushed”, leading to a document “that has errors and does not provide the level of detail we would have expected to enable us to reach an informed decision”. The three-page document that outlines the early findings of the consultation acknowledges a series of questions over the finances supporting the scheme and what would happen to properties that were not financially viable and on the verge of collapse.
Some demanded whether the new-look English Heritage could really achieve the proposed aim of becoming self-sufficient and called for clarity on what would happen if it fails to do so. While the Government has not yet published the responses, many organisations have now chosen to publish theirs online.
The lack of clarity over future funding “casts a considerable shadow over the viability” of the new body, the Institute for Archaeologists said in its response. The chief executive, Peter Hinton, wrote that the Government had failed to provide enough detail “to give confidence that the charity can become self-funding” in the eight-year period envisioned.
He added that while there may be a growth in membership, “the absence of any contingency planning in the vision is a real cause for concern”.
The Government is to give £80m to English Heritage to allow it to carry out major refurbishment across its properties, but some respondents, including the Society for the Protection of Ancient Buildings, do not believe that this sum is enough. Several responses warned that the consultation provided no clarity should Britain be hit with another crisis, such as the foot-and-mouth disease or flooding.
The concerns have prompted Helen Goodman, the shadow Culture Minister, to call for the Government to go “back to the drawing board”. Ms Goodman said: “People have several concerns. One is whether Historic England, the planning organisation, will be adequately resourced. If not, it spells disaster for the built environment over the long term; an erosion of building protection. The Government also seems to have paid no attention to what happens if there’s a disaster somewhere. That could happen at any moment and that’s irresponsible.”
English Heritage chief executive, Simon Thurley, has said the move is “the only way forward” and the majority of respondents supported the split in principle. The Department for Culture, Media and Sport said it was compiling a detailed response to the consultation and would publish its findings by the summer.
- 1 Nigel Farage: Me vs Russell Brand on Question Time – he's got the chest hair but where are his ideas?
- 2 Harry Potter fans can apply to the Hogwarts-inspired College of Wizardry
- 3 Jessica Chambers: 19-year-old woman 'doused with lighter fluid and burned alive' in the US
- 4 Russell Brand calls Nigel Farage 'poundshop Enoch Powell' in BBC Question Time debate
- 5 Orange Wednesdays are no more
Weather bomb in pictures: Storms cuts power for tens of thousands – and snow is on the way
Jessica Chambers: 19-year-old woman 'doused with lighter fluid and burned alive' in the US
Russell Brand calls Nigel Farage 'poundshop Enoch Powell' in BBC Question Time debate
Russell Brand was rendered speechless on Question Time by this man
Fury at Airbus after it hints the super-jumbo may be mothballed
Disgruntled RBS worker writes hilarious open letter to Russell Brand after anti-capitalist publicity stunt leaves him hungry
Nigel Farage's approval rating hits 'record low' as popularity suffers in wake of Ukip sex scandal
Nigel Farage defends Kerry Smith 'ch***y' comment: 'If you are going for a Chinese, what do you say you’re going for?'
Pakistan school attack live: Taliban kill at least 132 children in 'horrifying' massacre
Sony hack: Angelina Jolie branded 'seriously out of her mind' in further embarrassing leaked email saga
Panic Saturday: 13 million Britons spend £1.2bn – while 13 million others across the country live in poverty unable to afford food
£65000 - £80000 per annum: Recruitment Genius: Finance Director required to jo...
£15000 - £25000 per annum: Recruitment Genius: This is a unique opportunity fo...
£50000 per annum + 26 days holiday,pension: Ashdown Group: A highly successful...
£27000 per annum + pension + holidays: The Jenrick Group: A Quality Technician...