UK

null 7° London Hi 5°C / Lo 0°C

Safety fears over future long-haul flights

Ice in fuel system caused Heathrow crash, says report

By Michael Savage
Friday, 5 September 2008

The British Airways Boeing 777 on the southern runway at Heathrow after its crash landing in January

PA

The British Airways Boeing 777 on the southern runway at Heathrow after its crash landing in January

Related Articles

Airlines are being urged to implement new safety measures for long-haul aircraft after investigators found that the crash-landing of a Boeing 777 at Heathrow was probably caused by ice in its fuel system.

The previously unknown problem was revealed in a report into the accident on 17 January involving a British Airways flight from Shanghai. The Air Accidents Investigation Branch is urging European and US regulators to introduce interim measures for all Boeing 777s powered by Rolls-Royce Trent 800 engines to prevent a similar incident.

It also wants the aviation industry to ensure that fuel systems can cope with the potential build-up and sudden release of ice. The findings could result in long-haul flights being made to fly at lower altitudes to prevent the build-up of ice crystals inside their fuel tanks.

Flight BA038 was seconds away from touching down when it lost power. The pilot did not even have time to warn his 136 passengers to brace themselves before he realised the jet was not going to reach the runway.

In what was the most serious incident at Heathrow for 30 years, passengers were flung forward as the aircraft stalled 400 yards short of the south runway, skimmed a perimeter fence and careered to a halt on a grass verge. One person suffered a broken leg and eight others received minor injuries. It later emerged that the cockpit crew could not get the required thrust as the jet approached Heathrow.

AAIB experts now believe the formation of ice meant that fuel could not be delivered fast enough to the 777's Rolls-Royce Trent engines. They ruled out any problems with the quality of the fuel or mistakes by the crew.

The AAIB report – the fifth released so far – concluded: "The investigation has shown that the fuel flow to both engines was restricted – most probably due to ice within the fuel feed system. This ice is likely to have formed from water that occurred naturally in the fuel whilst the aircraft operated for a long period, with low fuel flows, in an unusually cold environment."

Although the Boeing's fuel did not freeze, its temperature fell to -34°C (-29°F) and stayed there for about 80 minutes. Investigators said the problems might have been caused by the length of time the fuel temperature was below zero, coupled with the sudden change in fuel flow demanded as it attempted to land.

The report added: "Although the exact mechanism in which the ice has caused the restriction is still unknown in detail, it has been proven that ice could cause a restriction in the fuel-feed system. The risk of recurrence needs to be addressed in the short term whilst the investigation continues."

The AAIB suggested the problem could be solved with the use of military technology which combats the formation of ice. It added: "Operational changes to reduce the risk of ice formation causing a restricted fuel flow at critical stages of flight could be introduced. Such changes could be implemented quickly, but must not compromise the safe operation of the aircraft."

The investigation into the crash is continuing with testing at Rolls-Royce in Derby, and at the home of Boeing in Seattle. BA said it was working closely with the investigation team.

Following the release of yesterday's report, a spokesman for the US Federal Aviation Administration said it would be issuing an airworthiness directive to all US carriers operating Boeing 777 aircraft.

This was likely to recommend "changes in procedures for pilots to follow in certain cold weather conditions", as well as "changes in certain fuel procedures on the ground". While it would not be an emergency directive, he added, it was likely to be issued within 24 hours and would have immediate effect.

Interesting? Click here to explore further

Comments

17 Comments

After almost 9 months The investigation report gave a birth to a disabled child. Comment from a Boeing pilot says I quote "On transport jets, any number of engines are fed from seperate tanks. If so better to say they forgot to fill the tanks with fuel or filled with bad fuel. I would like to know what the explanation of Boeing 777 pilots of crashed aircraft would say.

Posted by Erol Basarik | 05.09.08, 23:18 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

Going back the fuel conundrum, if the fuel doesn't freeze until -57 deg C, and the temperature was only -34 deg C, it's hard to see how ice was the cause. Also I understand the AAIB earlier reports indicated the fuel, when analysed, had less water than the limits allowed. However, the high pressure fuel pumps showed unusual and high wear rates, but not so as they'd stop working. So perhaps odd things happen to the water content at these low temps - turning into tiny abrasive pipe blocking ice particles perhaps?

Posted by Chris Clark | 05.09.08, 17:30 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

Seems odd that the AAIB reccomendations are for the RR Trent 800 engines only as they do not mention the Pratt & Whitney, and GE engines that also power the 777's.

Posted by John | 05.09.08, 17:26 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

Thanks Michael (16:20) .... I think I'll have some Valium instead...

Posted by Lola | 05.09.08, 17:16 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

I feel I should have a comment somehow but can't really think of anything that sounds like I know anything really.
Tea, coffee anyone???

Posted by michael o'leerieeee | 05.09.08, 16:20 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

I agree with your point, Gavin, but perhaps public perception of aviation and flight safety would be improved if journalists were less slapdash with their use of terminology and technical principles.

As another example, I can't see any recommendation of "long-haul flights being made to fly at lower altitudes to prevent the build-up of ice crystals inside their fuel tanks" in the AAIB report.

Posted by Sam | 05.09.08, 16:05 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

What a bunch of anoraks!

Posted by Colin | 05.09.08, 15:33 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

I suspect the article used the word "stall" as most people would understand it, rather than in the aerodynamic sense - namely, "the engine stopped".

My remark about glide potential was a shorthand way of saying that just because the engines fail, it doesn't mean that an aircraft suddenly stops moving forward and drops to the ground.

(Ask a random group of people if a 747 can glide, if you want a gauge of public perception and understanding of the mechanics of flight...)

Posted by Gavin | 05.09.08, 15:03 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

If the aircraft had stalled it would have no glide potential. In a stall the wing is no longer flying; airflow over it has become turbulent and lift significantly reduced.

Nowhere in the AAIB report does it say that the aircraft stalled. 'Stalling' in the aerodynamic sense is not a particularly technical term, and I would have expected the Independent to be aware of the difference.

Re the 777 being limited to overland flights, the AAIB report states that this is a single failure in 6.5 million flight hours, and the probabiliy of repeat is considered to be (I quote) 'remote'.

Posted by Sam | 05.09.08, 13:48 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

Not really, John. 400 yards out, the plane is not very high above the ground and it still has good glide potential. If my sums are correct, it's about 6 seconds from the runway threshold. Go to any airport and see where the aircraft is at that point.

I'm sure our Boeing pilot can provide us with better details.

(Do you remember the Sioux City crash? The aircraft cartwheeled, burst into a ball of flames and broke into pieces. People walked away from that unscathed.)

Posted by Gavin | 05.09.08, 13:26 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

17 Comments

Article Archive

Day In a Page

Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat

Select date