Senior judges criticise Government's use of secret courts
Judges also lifted 'arbitrary and irrational' sanctions imposed against Iranian Bank Mellat
The most senior judges in the land issued a damning indictment of the Government's policy on secret courts, accusing it of requesting unnecessary closed proceedings.
Alongside a judgement in which they also lifted “arbitrary and irrational” sanctions imposed against Iranian Bank Mellat, they issued a warning that secret hearings should only be used when “genuinely necessary in the interests of justice”.
The ruling comes just weeks before the expected expansion of closed material procedures (CMPs) following royal assent of the Justice and Security Act.
Bank Mellat was appealing sanctions imposed by the Treasury in 2009, which shut down its business in the UK because of alleged links with Iran's nuclear weapons programme. It denied any such links.
In March, the Supreme Court reluctantly agreed by a two-thirds majority to hold a CMP after the Treasury said that evidence it had against the bank was too sensitive to be heard publicly.
Reading out the judgement, Lord Neuberger President of the Supreme Court and an outspoken advocate of open justice, said: “Having held a closed hearing, it turned out that there had been no point in the Supreme Court seeing the closed judgment, because there was nothing in it which could have affected the Supreme Court's reasoning in relation to the substantive appeal on the 2009 Order.”
Lord Neuberger said conclusions could be drawn from the experience, adding “appellate courts should be robust about acceding to applications to go into closed session or even to look at closed material”.
Tonight the human rights charity Reprieve said the case seriously undermined the Government's claims it would only seek secret hearings only when absolutely necessary.
Corinna Ferguson, Legal Officer for Liberty, said: “Today's chilling judgment brutally exposes the Government's claims and lays bare its willingness to overstate the importance of secrecy to serve its own ends.”
Today the Supreme Court quashed the sanctions order, saying the bank was singled out in an arbitrary, irrational and disproportionate manner. It was given no opportunity to defend itself in procedures that were “demonstrably unfair”, the judges said.
Sarosh Zaiwalla, who represented the bank, said: “The judgement will put enormous confidence in the independence of the British Judiciary and sets an example that even controversial disputes can be resolved by applying the principle of rule of law through the British courts.
”Nevertheless, the reading of the closed judgement clearly contravenes the British principle of open justice, the bank's success demonstrates just how unjustified closed sessions are.“
- 1 Student jailed for hacking University of Birmingham computers to improve his grades
- 2 Smartphones are making children borderline autistic, says psychiatrist
- 3 Company breaks open Apple Watch to discover what it says is 'planned obsolescence'
- 5 The most powerful passports in the world
Student jailed for hacking University of Birmingham computers to improve his grades
Smartphones are making children borderline autistic, says psychiatrist
Nepal earthquake: More than 1,100 killed across four countries and in Mount Everest avalanche
Royal baby: Live updates as the wait continues for Duchess of Cambridge's second child
Hermann Goering's daughter fails to reclaim items looted by Nazi deputy during WWII
The sickening truth about food banks that the Tories don't want you to know
Migrant boat disaster: Ukip candidate mocks victims in sickening Twitter post
Nigel Farage wants the BBC to stop making programmes like Doctor Who, Strictly Come Dancing, and Top Gear
Global warming: Scientists say temperatures could rise by 6C by 2100 and call for action ahead of UN meeting in Paris
General Election 2015: Britain would become a 'communist dictatorship' under Ed Miliband and Nicola Sturgeon, claims wife of Michael Gove
Rupert Murdoch berated Sun journalists for not doing enough to attack Ed Miliband and stop him winning the general election
£24000 - £26000 per annum + benefits : Ashdown Group: A highly successful, glo...
£22000 - £40000 per annum: Recruitment Genius: This company is part of a Group...
£16000 - £18000 per annum: Recruitment Genius: Are you a a young, dynamic pers...
Voluntary: Cancer Research UK: We’re looking for someone to support our award ...