UK

7° London Hi 15°C / Lo 7°C

'Shoplifter' fails to halt deportation to US

By John Aston, Press Association

The High Court has refused to halt the deportation of a US citizen who fears he could spend at least 17 years in jail - and possibly life - if found guilty of shoplifting electric toothbrushes.

Miguel Sanchez could face severe punishment under California's tough "three-strikes and you're out" laws.

Today two judges ruled European human rights laws could not save Sanchez from harsh American punishment on the basis that it was "inhuman and degrading".

Lord Justice Moses, sitting with Mr Justice Hickinbottom, said the English courts should not interfere with the decision of "a democratic friendly state" to radically increase the sentences of repeat offenders.

If convicted of the toothbrush crime, Sanchez, currently held at Belmarsh top security prison, would become a "third strike offender".

The judge said this would normally result in an indeterminate sentence of imprisonment of at least 25 years.

However the Californian prosecuting authorities had given an assurance that Sanchez would not be prosecuted as a third-strike offender.

But a careful analysis of the Californian three-strikes penal code by Sanchez's lawyers showed he could, in the light of previous convictions, nonetheless receive a sentence of between 17-23 years if found guilty.

The judge said Sanchez was asking the court to overturn the Home Secretary's refusal to revoke his deportation order.

It was argued even a sentence of 17-23 years would be disproportionate to his crimes and amount to inhuman and degrading punishment, contrary to Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights.

It was the Home Secretary's case that even if Sanchez was to face a life sentence, with a minimum term of 25 years, his Article 3 rights would not be affected.

Rejecting Sanchez's application for judicial review, the judge said: "A democratic, friendly state has decided that those who repeatedly offend run the risk of sentences in which proved previous conduct will radically increase the term of imprisonment.

"It is impossible to say that to send this man back to face trial would, in all the circumstances, be exposing him to a risk of a breach of Article 3."

Mr Justice Hickinbottom agreed.

Sanchez is wanted for trial for second degree robbery. He allegedly, in September 2006, stole electric toothbrushes from a chemist in Santa Monica, and put a security officer in fear that he might use force or violence as he fled.

He came to England a month after the alleged offence. Here he received a three-year jail sentence after committing a series of offences under the alias "Zachary Tracey", including burglary and possession of prohibited drugs, weapons and ammunition.

He was recommended for deportation back to the US.

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

Democratic/Friendly
[info]kaptainkitten wrote:
Friday, 20 November 2009 at 05:53 pm (UTC)
What has that got to do with anything?

Clearly it's inhumane, that is all that matters.


Are UK judges entirely independent of politcal intereference anymore? (or were they ever?)
Re: Democratic/Friendly
[info]theelectrician wrote:
Friday, 20 November 2009 at 09:26 pm (UTC)
"He came to England a month after the alleged offence. Here he received a three-year jail sentence after committing a series of offences under the alias "Zachary Tracey", including burglary and possession of prohibited drugs, weapons and ammunition. "

How about he comes to live with you? You can give him care in your community :)
The USA Know How To Treat Criminals
[info]mike4626 wrote:
Friday, 20 November 2009 at 06:20 pm (UTC)
much better than a fixed penalty notice or community service
Law and order.
[info]headsnoface wrote:
Friday, 20 November 2009 at 07:30 pm (UTC)
Book him Dano.
Risk
[info]yambas wrote:
Friday, 20 November 2009 at 09:06 pm (UTC)
Why did he continue to steal?
[info]corporatelies wrote:
Friday, 20 November 2009 at 09:58 pm (UTC)
I might be wrong but with a name like miguel sanchez, this NON WHITE individual, had essentially zero chance of getting his way in a weak and subserviant british court which has always, with our government, kowtowed to the only superpower left. At least the Russians and Chinese, even a small country like Cuba know the importance of something called "backbone" when it comes to national pride.
[info]beenign wrote:
Friday, 20 November 2009 at 11:15 pm (UTC)
"I might be wrong but with a name like miguel sanchez, this NON WHITE individual, had essentially zero chance of getting his way in a weak and subserviant british court which has always, with our government, kowtowed to the only superpower left"

Perhaps he would have had a better chance in the "subsevient british court" if he had not come to "subservient Britain" and committed burglary and possession of prohibited drugs, weapons and ammunition.

A Bit Of Advice
[info]dreambrother28 wrote:
Friday, 20 November 2009 at 11:19 pm (UTC)
If you are going to commit a crime, run away abroad and then beg them not to send you back to your home country because you'll have to answer for that crime, don't get a three year sentence for "burglary and possession of prohibited drugs, weapons and ammunition" in the meantime.
He's not going to be specifically sent back to the US to stand trial, it doesn't mention extradition anywhere. He's going to be deported back to his home country because, in spite of the accusations of leniency British judicial system attracts, he managed to get himself sentenced to three years here, and what the US judicial system thus does with him with respect to the crime they want him for is no business of the UK government.
(no subject) - [info]elivebuy - Saturday, 21 November 2009 at 12:25 am (UTC) Expand

Article Archive

Day In a Page

Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat

Select date