UK

Partly Sunny with Showers 9° London Hi 12°C / Lo 6°C

Social worker training 'not fit for purpose'

By Richard Garner, Education Editor

Rookie recruits to social work are routinely sent out to tackle the most difficult cases - putting children’s lives at risk, according to a report by MPs published today.

MPs on the influential Commons select committee monitoring children’s services warn that the training of social workers "is not fit for purpose".

University courses in the subject are considered "easy to pass" - partly because universities face financial penalties if they expel students and partly because of an anxiety about staff shortages in the profession.

As a result, says the report, new recruits to the profession often find themselves being sent out to deal with families in the most challenging circumstances.

""Vulnerable children and families depend, often for their lives, on competent professional help from social work professionals," said Barry Sheerman, chairman of the committee and Labour MP for Huddersfield.

The report added: "It is unacceptable that social work courses, or any element of them, should have a reputation for being ‘difficult to fail’.

"A review of the funding arrangements for social work degrees is needed to ensure that there are no in

The MPs conducted their inquiry into the wake of the Baby Peter tragedy in Haringey, north London, the toddler who died after being found with more than fifty different injuries inflicted at his home while in the care of his mother, her boyfriend and her lodger.

They found also that those applying to join social work courses had lower A-level qualifications generally than students opting for similar public service careers - such as teaching and medicine.

The report concluded: "When social workers are poorly trained - lacking in knowledge, skills or experience - or left unsupported in highly pressured situations, children’s lives are put in danger.

"Nine years on from the tragedy of Victoria Climbie - (another Haringey toddler whose death exposed a harrowing tale of abuse and neglect by social workers), the lack of a coherent and prestigious national profile for the social work profession appears to us to be perhaps the most important failing of the Every Child Matters (the government’s programme for improving children’s services) reforms."

"Social workers need a high quality national training body and high profile national leadership of their profession and they need to be better rewarded," Mr Sheerman added.

The MPs also recommend a ban on sending trainee social workers on placements to authorities assessed by Ofsted, the children’s services watchdog, as "performing poorly". Earlier this month it emerged that - out of nine spot checks on authorities carried out by Ofsted since the baby Peter case - six had given "cause for concern".

The report also calls for action to improve pay and the standing of the profession from ministers - which it acknowledges they have achieved in reforms to the teaching profession.

"High vacancies and retention problems have plagued children families social work for too long," it added.

Today’s report comes the day after a government task force produced its own interim report on improving the training of social workers. It also warned that "widespread staffing shortages mean that social work is struggling to hold its own as a durable, attractive public service profession - compromising its ability to deliver consistent quality on the frontline".

A final report will be published in the autumn.

Children’s Minister Delyth Morgan welcomed the MPs’ "timely" report.

She added: "The Government is committed to ensuring that social workers have the training they need to practice to the highest professional standard."

Sir Steve Bullock, from the Local Government association, said that too many graduates of social work courses were unprepared for the reality of the difficult jobs they would face.

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

Finally...
[info]ancientoneuk wrote:
Thursday, 30 July 2009 at 12:47 pm (UTC)
And pretty much what I said to this same committee back in 2003 and is lodged in Parliaments library too.

But it ignores the atrocious standards of the veteran workers, it ignores too the wholly sinister aspect of adoption quotas, council star ratings and the highly despised family courts too.

And once again, the two bodies brought into being to regulate child protection and social work evade criticism even though they still allow workers with too long a complaint history to change their name on the register, have failed to enforce registration and qualification compliance, in short they are as much as part of the problem because the bad workers never get weeded out.

Our children, whether at risk or not deserve the very best, what they are getting are social workers that lie, social workers that falsify reports or offer mere suspicion and opinion as legal fact, social workers that have drug habits, social workers that aren't even qualified but still trade on a CSCQ certificate which is the equivalent of an A level at best, our children are not getting best service and are being failed time and time again.
Social Worker and Training
[info]rsbarker wrote:
Thursday, 30 July 2009 at 01:15 pm (UTC)
So social worker training is not fit for the purpose. This is true but what is also true that many social workers are not fit for the purpose along with many teachers, probation officers and nurses and other public. Many may have adequete educational skills but lack the natural ability to do the job. Someone once said that teachers are born. I think that is true of many professions including social workers.
Compare UK to Ireland
[info]miavlentina wrote:
Thursday, 30 July 2009 at 01:38 pm (UTC)
Ever wondered why normal frontline social workers are paid 50k a year here in ireland? its because people have to hold a degree and 3 years in house training BEFORE they can be a social worker in Ireland! they got it right i rekon and they dont have to recruit from abroad here in Ireland either like the UK do because people here actually want to be social workers as it is a well respected profession and we consider those who are those who are to be intelligent,articluate and have some common sense!
I also think that because forced adoption is illegal here in Ireland social workers do not have an incentive to take away children for 'recycling' so are able to concentrate on more serious cases than those like in UK where thousands of children are taken for 'emotional harm'.
Too much ideology, too little real preparation ...
[info]john_b_ellis wrote:
Thursday, 30 July 2009 at 04:40 pm (UTC)
Interesting to see this. Back in the mid-90s I made a career change, when I was nearly 50, in order to train as a social worker. I trained to work with adults (mainly older people), not children and families, but, from memory, the whole of the first year's training and the beginning of the second year's was common to both sets of students together. I then worked in local authority social work teams for nine years.

The training course (Diploma in Social Work) took two years, and teaching staff regularly bewailed the fact that it wasn't three. Yet, though it was a full time course, we were hardly ever in college for a full week; mostly it was three days a week, quite often only two, occasionally one, and now and then not at all! Only on placement, when naturally we worked a normal working week, was it what I would call truly full time.

Comparing it to my degree course, in a subject unrelated to social work back in the 60s, I reckoned that the academic part of the DipSW course when I did it, if taught at the pace of my degree, could have been covered quite easily in one academic year. Simply extending the time over which the training is given is no necessary guarantee of efficiency!

We had some really useful and worthwhile teaching in human psychology, law and sociology, though it sometimes tended to be a bit basic and superficial. But - despite the fact that we were then at the fag end of eighteen years of Thatcherism in government! - utterly disproportionate tracts of teaching time were spent on what was effectively a presentation of Marxist social theory as the only way of viewing the world, and on race, gender and sexuality "awareness"; presented, often truculently, by staff who made their political agenda utterly clear, and for some of whom that political agenda seemed to be their main preoccupation in teaching.

The prime aim seemed thus to turn out social workers who were "right on" in their political and social ideology, rather than competent and confident professionals. Of course, as people are all individuals, and most on my course were old enough to have a fair amount of life experience, it didn't produce a monochrome clutch of PC Marxist clones. What it did do was to make people keep their heads down and not query the ideology, for fear they'd fail the course!

So no wonder ancientoneUK speaks of social workers who lie, because class warfare justifies a lie; no wonder he says some use illegal drugs, because they're taught that the the law imposes bourgeois morality, and no wonder some offer suspicion and opinion as legal fact, because they're taught quite specifically that they are there to war against oppression, gender discrimination and racism and to transform society, and that to wage that war is the priority. And rsbarker's right too - natural ability to do the job doesn't come into it - indeed, it was normal for teaching staff to reiterate over and again that common sense and life experience should be set to one side: the theories were all!

Yet most social workers in most places don't have to face race equality issues in most of their cases; nor deal sensitively with transexuals or gays, young or old. The balance of the training was just skewed, and making social work a degree entry profession over three years won't necessarily alter that.

Most popular


Article Archive

Day In a Page

Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat

Select date