The Duke and Duchess of Cambridge warned not to 'cherry pick' privacy battles
The advise was given after the couple appear not to have taken legal action against Hello! magazine who published photos of the Duchess and Prince George
The Duke and Duchess of Cambridge have been warned by a legal expert not to “cherry pick” which privacy cases they pursue, after a paparazzi photo of Prince George was published in a magazine.
The image showed Kate Middleton and her six-month-old son George leaving a British Airways plane thought to be on the Caribbean island of St Vincent, en route to their holiday in Mustique.
The long-lense photos featured on the cover and in eight pages of Hello! Magazine from late January, marks the first time his image has been seen publicly since he was christened in the autumn.
It has sparked questions as to why the couple has not tried to stop the photo being published, when they have previously expressed concern that allowing photos of Prince George to be published would breach his privacy.
In the past the palace has taken legal action against “off-duty” photography of the couple and appealed to photographers to follow their industry's code of practice.
Last week, Kensington Palace had asked newspapers not to publish pictures of the Duke of Cambridge looking unhappy getting off a train in Cambridge.
Jeremy Clarke-Williams, a media lawyer with the firm Slater & Gordon, said: “It seems in this case the Royal Family or Kate and William have decided they can live with this particular unauthorised photo even though it shows their child's face.”
He added that while he does not think the couple’s message is “anything goes” and that “pictures will be viewed on a case by case basis," he said there is a danger they could be seen to be “cherry picking the cases they pursue”.
“The courts might look dimly on that,” he said.
It is thought their decision to not launch a case may be based on the fact that the photos are of a low quality, and do not show the baby’s face in any great detail.
The couple previously sought redress through the French legal system after topless photos of the Duchess were published in French Closer magazine in 2009, when she was not married to Prince William.
She later won £5,000 in damages and an apology from Rex Features for invasion of privacy.
Kensington Palace declined to comment on the photos published in Hello! But Royal sources told The Telegraph that it did not object to the pictures because they were taken “in a public place, without any harassment or pursuit”.
Additional reporting by PA
Returning to the stage after 20 years makes actress feel 'nauseous'
Top conservatoire offers ‘groundbreaking’ arts degree
- 1 Scottish independence: Ireland since 1919 is a lesson for Scotland in what a Yes vote means
- 2 Watch a man race the Circle line and win
- 3 A bottle of wine a day is not bad for you and abstaining is worse than drinking, scientist claims
- 4 Grandmas keep accidentally tagging themselves as Grandmaster Flash on Facebook
- 5 Daniele Watts: Django Unchained actress detained by Los Angeles police after being mistaken for a prostitute
Islamic State: Pope is 'being targeted by Isis', Iraqi ambassador to the Holy See warns
Jennifer Lawrence and Kate Upton nude pictures exhibition cancelled after artist concedes photos were 'stolen property'
Scotland independence: A nation divided against itself: Brown says SNP are liars. Darling joins in. Salmond fights back
John Travolta addresses former pilot's gay romance allegations publicly for the first time
Richard III: Two years after his body was found scientists discover how he died
Daniele Watts: Django Unchained actress detained by Los Angeles police after being mistaken for a prostitute
The political class is doing what Hitler couldn’t – destroying Britain
Scottish independence: Nationalist leader Jim Sillars threatens pro-union companies with 'day of reckoning' after independence
Scottish independence: Yes campaign feels the heat as Alex Salmond's NHS claims come under furious attack
Portuguese academic says British are 'filthy, violent and drunk'
£23m Birmingham cycle scheme is attacked by Tory councillor for not catering to the elderly
£20000 - £25000 per annum + OTE £35,000 first year: SThree: The SThree group i...
£40000 - £45000 per annum + pension, healthcare,25 days: Ashdown Group: An est...
£28000 per annum: Ashdown Group: IT Software Application Support Analyst - Imm...
£50 per day: Randstad Education Cheshire: SEN Teaching Assistant EBD , Septemb...