Law Lords assert authority over Government in landmark ruling: Judges assert authority over executive in landmark ruling
In a landmark judgment, five Law Lords said that courts had the power to grant injunctions against officers and the Crown, and enforce sanctions if necessary.
Their unanimous decision, which overturned previous rulings, came as they upheld a finding that Kenneth Baker was in contempt of court when, as Home Secretary, he ignored an instruction from a judge in an asylum case.
Mr Baker had argued that since he was acting as a minister of the Crown at the time and that since, under English law, the Crown can do no wrong, he could not be punished.
But his claims were given short shrift in the House of Lords.
Lord Templeman said Mr Baker was, in effect, arguing that ministers 'obey the law as a matter of grace and not as a matter of necessity, a proposition which would reverse the result of the Civil War'.
Lawyers said the judgment would be of huge significance in a wide range of judicial review proceedings, but particularly those involving immigration and asylum claims.
For example, they said it opened the way for judges to order that the Home Office should not deport asylum seekers until their case had been heard. Until now, officials have been free to expel applicants as and when they liked.
Yesterday's ruling arose out of just such a case. In May 1991, a Zairean teacher was sent back to Kinshasa after his application for refugee status was turned down by the Home Office.
In a last-minute move, his lawyers asked for a judicial review and obtained a High Court order that the man, known as M, be brought back to Britain.
But Mr Baker, advised that the order was invalid, chose to ignore it, leaving M stranded in Zaire where he claimed to be at risk of persecution.
Last night, M's solicitor, David Burgess, said the Home Office had treated the case 'as a matter of no consequence'. 'They just wanted to get rid of the man,' he said.
In a hearing last year, the Court of Appeal accepted Mr Baker's assurances that he never intended to flout judicial authority but nevertheless found him to be personally in contempt.
This decision was modified slightly by the House of Lords, which said that he was guilty only in his capacity as Home Secretary and not as a private individual.
In the leading judgment, Lord Woolf declined to punish Mr Baker, saying that the contempt of court ruling was sufficient to 'vindicate the requirements of justice'. It was for Parliament to 'determine what should be the consequences of that finding', he said.
Law report, page 12
Leading article, page 19
- 1 Chelsea victory parade mocked on Twitter as 'tens of fans' pack the streets of London
- 3 Johnny Depp facing 10 years in jail for illegally bringing dogs to Australia
- 4 US warned by Chinese media to stop meddling or 'war will be inevitable'
- 5 Isis burns woman alive for refusing to engage in 'extreme' sex act, UN says
Cyclist who knocked down three-year-old girl says his life has been 'destroyed'
Australian man punched in the face for defending Muslim women from abuse on train
Johnny Depp facing 10 years in jail for illegally bringing dogs to Australia
US warned by Chinese media to stop meddling or 'war will be inevitable'
Isis burns woman alive for refusing to engage in 'extreme' sex act, UN says
As a white man, I'm surprised more women aren't tweeting the hashtag #KillAllWhiteMen
Scotland may have to leave the EU even if it votes to stay in, David Cameron confirms
EU referendum: David Cameron's rules are a 'democratic disgrace', says French-born Scottish politician set to be denied a vote
The day that Britain resigned as a global power
SNP fury as HS2 finds 'no business case' for taking fast train service to Scotland
A nation of inequality: How the UK is failing to feed its most vulnerable people
£20000 - £25000 per annum + uncapped commission, Benefits, OTE £100k: SThree: ...
£32K: Guru Careers: We are seeking a Dining Room Head Chef to work for one of ...
£27K: Guru Careers: We are seeking a Pastry Sous Chef / Experienced Pastry Che...
£20000 - £25000 per annum + competitive: SThree: Are you a recent graduate loo...