Law Report: Custodial sentences were justified: Regina v Oliver and Regina v Little. Court of Appeal (Lord Taylor of Gosforth, Lord Chief Justice, Mr Justice Potts and Mr Justice Judge), 27 November 1992
The Court of Appeal dismissed appeals against sentence.
The appellants were in breach of probation orders for two offences of dwelling house burglary and were sentenced in October 1992 to 12 months' detention in a young offender institution.
Andrew J Robertson (Registrar of Criminal Appeals) for the appellants; David Calvert-Smith and David Thomas (CPS) as amicus curiae.
LORD TAYLOR CJ, giving the judgment of the court, said that the appellants appealed on the ground that the court had no jurisdiction to pass sentence for the offences for which they had been placed on probation before the Criminal Justice Act 1991 had come into force in October 1992.
The making of a probation order prior to October 1992 was not a sentence. If the appellants committed any offence while subject to probation orders they were liable to be brought back and dealt with as if they had just been convicted of the original offences under section 8 of the Powers of Criminal Courts Act 1973. Section 14(1) of the 1991 Act, by bringing Schedule 2 into effect, continued the power formerly found in section 8 of the 1973 Act.
When the appellants appeared before the Crown Court in October 1992, they were liable to be 'sentenced' as if they had just been convicted of the offences for which they were placed on probation. It was also submitted that a custodial sentence was not justified. There might well be cases where, notwithstanding that the offence itself passed the custody threshold, there was sufficient mitigation to lead the court to impose a community sentence. Nevertheless, if a further offence or offences were committed while the community sentence was in force, and the defendant was brought to court for sentence, he would have deprived himself of much of the mitigation such as good character, genuine remorse, which had led the original court to pass a community rather than a custodial sentence.
Once an offender had qualified for a custodial sentence, the court was not precluded from passing on the same occasion custodial sentences for offences which did not themselves satisfy the statutory requirements. However it would usually be inappropriate for consecutive sentences to be passed for offences which did not themselves satisfy the requirements relating to custody or for sentences to be made longer than strictly justified by reference to those offences which did qualify. The sentences passed were not excessive.
Oscar Pistorius trial: Defence witness contradicts athlete version
Oscar Pistorius trial: The case against Oscar Pistorius – and why the prosecution claims his story doesn't add up
South Korea ferry: Captain Lee Joon-seok could face criminal investigation as over 280 remain missing
Peaches Geldof dead: Private funeral for the family and friends of the socialite will take place next week
Shropshire criminals ‘using unmanned drones and infrared cameras to find illegal cannabis farms’ – and then steal from the growers
The food poverty scandal that shames Britain: Nearly 1m people rely on handouts to eat – and benefit reforms may be to blame
US Navy christens huge $3 billion destroyer ship USS Zumwalt that appears as a fishing boat on enemy radar
Scottish independence: It is the English who should be on their knees, begging the Scots to vote ‘No’
Nigel Farage fatigue? Half of voters ‘immune’ to Ukip’s appeal
Nigel Farage on Have I Got News For You: Ukip leader ridiculed over expenses and party 'fruitcakes'
Nigel Farage: I’m taking on the status quo, and the Establishment’s fighting back
- 1 Poveglia: 'World's most haunted island' up for sale...is anyone brave enough to buy it?
- 2 The Hobbit: There and Back Again set for possible title change
- 3 Video of British Muslims dancing to Pharrell Williams's hit Happy attacked as 'sinful'
- 4 24 people applied for the 'world's toughest job', here are their interviews
- 5 Andre Johnson: Wu-Tang Clan-discovered rapper severed his penis and jumped from LA building
£150.00 per week: QA Apprenticeships: This company is a company that specializ...
£153.75 per week: QA Apprenticeships: This company is an innovative outsourcin...
£150.00 per week: QA Apprenticeships: This company has been providing on site ...
£150.00 per week: QA Apprenticeships: We've been supplying best of breed peopl...