Law Report: Farmhouse was not "agricultural land"

Starke v Inland Revenue Commissioners. Court of Appeal (Lord Justice Stuart-Smith, Lord Justice Morritt and Lord justice Ward). 19 May 1995

Farmhouse was not 'agricultural land'

Technical requirements of

affidavit must be observed

Starke v Inland Revenue Commissioners. Court of Appeal (Lord Justice Stuart-Smith, Lord Justice Morritt and Lord Justice Ward). 19 May 1995.

The expression "agricultural land or pasture" in the first part of section 115(2) of the Inheritance Tax Act 1984 did not include buildings or other structures on the land, since they were more specifically included in the latter parts of the definition in that section.

Accordingly, a 2.5 acre site, containing a substantial six-bedroomed farmhouse and an assortment of outbuildings together with several small areas of enclosed land, used as part of a medium-sized farm which carried on mixed farming, did not constitute "agricultural land" so as to be exempt from inheritance tax.

The Court of Appeal dismissed an appeal by the plaintiffs, Colin Barrymore Starke and Peter Michael Barlow (executors of the will of Wilfrid Edward Arnold Brown) against the decision of Mr Justice Blackburne ([1994] STC 295) dismissing their appeal against the commissioners' determination, on 21 May 1993, that Highways Farmhouse, Wiggington Heath, Oxfordshire, which had been transferred on the death of the deceased on 13 May 1988, did not qualify for agricultural property relief from inheritance tax under section 116.

Section 115(2) "agricultural property" was defined as "agricultural land or pasture and included woodland and any building used in connection with the intensive rearing of livestock or fish if the woodland or building is occupied with agricultural land or pasture and the occupation is ancillary to that of the agricultural land or pasture; and also includes such cottages, farm buildings and farmhouses, together with the land occupied with them, as are of a character appropriate to the property."

Gordon Apsion (Hancocks, Oxford) for the executors; Michael Furness (Solicitor, Inland Revenue) for the commissioners.

LORD JUSTICE MORRITT said that the executors originally applied for judicial review of the commissioners' determination. That application was obviously misconceived. By their amended application they sought leave to appeal for an order that the determination was wrong. But in view of the need to demonstrate that the appeal was substantially confined to a question of law, the executors undertook not to contend that the property came within the third part of the section 115(2) as being "such cottages, farm buildings and farmhouses, together with the land occupied with them, as are of a character appropriate to the property". Nor did they contend it within the second part, as being "woodland and any building used in connection with the intensive rearing of livestock or fish". The only question was whether the property fell within the first part, as "agricultural land or pasture". The Interpretation Act 1978 required "land" to be read as including "buildings or other structures" unless the contrary appeared. The contrary must appear, if at all, from other parts of the definition. In that connection, the second part was not of assistance. But the third part referred expressly to the buildings and structures that would be most obviously included in the words "agricultural land" if the Interpretation Act applied in full. Considering the structure of the definition as a whole, with the exception of "woodland" all that followed the words "agricultural land or pasture" was concerned with the buildings of one sort or another which were to be included. In such a context it would be surprising to find that buildings were already included in the phrase "agricultural land or pasture".

Paul Magrath, Barrister

Starke v Inland Revenue Commissioners. Court of Appeal (Lord Justice Stuart-Smith, Lord Justice Morritt and Lord Justice Ward). 19 May 1995.

The expression "agricultural land or pasture" in the first part of section 115(2) of the Inheritance Tax Act 1984 did not include buildings or other structures on the land, since they were more specifically included in the latter parts of the definition in that section.

Accordingly, a 2.5 acre site, containing a substantial six-bedroomed farmhouse and an assortment of outbuildings together with several small areas of enclosed land, used as part of a medium-sized farm which carried on mixed farming, did not constitute "agricultural land" so as to be exempt from inheritance tax.

The Court of Appeal dismissed an appeal by the plaintiffs, Colin Barrymore Starke and Peter Michael Barlow (executors of the will of Wilfrid Edward Arnold Brown) against the decision of Mr Justice Blackburne ([1994] STC 295) dismissing their appeal against the commissioners' determination, on 21 May 1993, that Highways Farmhouse, Wiggington Heath, Oxfordshire, which had been transferred on the death of the deceased on 13 May 1988, did not qualify for agricultural property relief from inheritance tax under section 116.

Section 115(2) "agricultural property" was defined as "agricultural land or pasture and included woodland and any building used in connection with the intensive rearing of livestock or fish if the woodland or building is occupied with agricultural land or pasture and the occupation is ancillary to that of the agricultural land or pasture; and also includes such cottages, farm buildings and farmhouses, together with the land occupied with them, as are of a character appropriate to the property."

Gordon Apsion (Hancocks, Oxford) for the executors; Michael Furness (Solicitor, Inland Revenue) for the commissioners.

LORD JUSTICE MORRITT said that the executors originally applied for judicial review of the commissioners' determination. That application was obviously misconceived. By their amended application they sought leave to appeal for an order that the determination was wrong. But in view of the need to demonstrate that the appeal was substantially confined to a question of law, the executors undertook not to contend that the property came within the third part of the section 115(2) as being "such cottages, farm buildings and farmhouses, together with the land occupied with them, as are of a character appropriate to the property". Nor did they contend it within the second part, as being "woodland and any building used in connection with the intensive rearing of livestock or fish". The only question was whether the property fell within the first part, as "agricultural land or pasture". The Interpretation Act 1978 required "land" to be read as including "buildings or other structures" unless the contrary appeared. The contrary must appear, if at all, from other parts of the definition. In that connection, the second part was not of assistance. But the third part referred expressly to the buildings and structures that would be most obviously included in the words "agricultural land" if the Interpretation Act applied in full. Considering the structure of the definition as a whole, with the exception of "woodland" all that followed the words "agricultural land or pasture" was concerned with the buildings of one sort or another which were to be included. In such a context it would be surprising to find that buildings were already included in the phrase "agricultural land or pasture".

Paul Magrath, Barrister

PROMOTED VIDEO
Have you tried new the Independent Digital Edition apps?
News
ebooksNow available in paperback
Latest stories from i100
Have you tried new the Independent Digital Edition apps?
Independent Dating
and  

By clicking 'Search' you
are agreeing to our
Terms of Use.

iJobs Job Widget
iJobs General

Savvy Media Ltd: Media Sales executive - Crawley

£25k + commission + benefits: Savvy Media Ltd: Find a job you love and never h...

Austen Lloyd: Corporate Solicitor NQ+ Oxford

Excellent Salary: Austen Lloyd: CORPORATE - Corporate Solicitor NQ+ An excelle...

Reach Volunteering: Financial Trustee and Company Secretary

Voluntary Only - Expenses Reimbursed: Reach Volunteering: A trustee (company d...

Recruitment Genius: Senior Project Manager

£45000 - £65000 per annum: Recruitment Genius: This is a fantastic opportunity...

Day In a Page

In a world of Saudi bullying, right-wing Israeli ministers and the twilight of Obama, Iran is looking like a possible policeman of the Gulf

Iran is shifting from pariah to possible future policeman of the Gulf

Robert Fisk on our crisis with Iran
The young are the new poor: A third of young people pushed into poverty

The young are the new poor

Sharp increase in the number of under-25s living in poverty
Greens on the march: ‘We could be on the edge of something very big’

Greens on the march

‘We could be on the edge of something very big’
Revealed: the case against Bill Cosby - through the stories of his accusers

Revealed: the case against Bill Cosby

Through the stories of his accusers
Why are words like 'mongol' and 'mongoloid' still bandied about as insults?

The Meaning of Mongol

Why are the words 'mongol' and 'mongoloid' still bandied about as insults?
Mau Mau uprising: Kenyans still waiting for justice join class action over Britain's role in the emergency

Kenyans still waiting for justice over Mau Mau uprising

Thousands join class action over Britain's role in the emergency
Isis in Iraq: The trauma of the last six months has overwhelmed the remaining Christians in the country

The last Christians in Iraq

After 2,000 years, a community will try anything – including pretending to convert to Islam – to avoid losing everything, says Patrick Cockburn
Black Friday: Helpful discounts for Christmas shoppers, or cynical marketing by desperate retailers?

Helpful discounts for Christmas shoppers, or cynical marketing by desperate retailers?

Britain braced for Black Friday
Bill Cosby's persona goes from America's dad to date-rape drugs

From America's dad to date-rape drugs

Stories of Bill Cosby's alleged sexual assaults may have circulated widely in Hollywood, but they came as a shock to fans, says Rupert Cornwell
Clare Balding: 'Women's sport is kicking off at last'

Clare Balding: 'Women's sport is kicking off at last'

As fans flock to see England women's Wembley debut against Germany, the TV presenter on an exciting 'sea change'
Oh come, all ye multi-faithful: The Christmas jumper is in fashion, but should you wear your religion on your sleeve?

Oh come, all ye multi-faithful

The Christmas jumper is in fashion, but should you wear your religion on your sleeve?
Dr Charles Heatley: The GP off to do battle in the war against Ebola

The GP off to do battle in the war against Ebola

Dr Charles Heatley on joining the NHS volunteers' team bound for Sierra Leone
Flogging vlogging: First video bloggers conquered YouTube. Now they want us to buy their books

Flogging vlogging

First video bloggers conquered YouTube. Now they want us to buy their books
Saturday Night Live vs The Daily Show: US channels wage comedy star wars

Saturday Night Live vs The Daily Show

US channels wage comedy star wars
When is a wine made in Piedmont not a Piemonte wine? When EU rules make Italian vineyards invisible

When is a wine made in Piedmont not a Piemonte wine?

When EU rules make Italian vineyards invisible