Law Report: Prison sentence imposed for serious offence: Attorney-General's Reference No 13 of 1993 - Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) (Lord Taylor of Gosforth, Lord Chief Justice, Mr Justice Alliott and Mr Justice Buckley), 29 July 1993
The Court of Appeal imposed a sentence of four months' imprisonment on the defendant, Karl Justin Gambrill, for an offence of attempted unlawful sexual intercourse with a girl under 13.
The defendant, who was aged 18 at the time of the offence, pleaded guilty at Winchester Crown Court. The offence was committed when the defendant, who had no previous convictions, was babysitting the victim, a girl of nine.
Judge Starforth Hill QC, when sentencing the defendant to two years' probation, remarked that the girl was not entirely an angel but that was no excuse for the defendant and said that the little girl could not be blamed at all. The Attorney-General applied for a review of the sentence on the ground that it was unduly lenient.
John Nutting (CPS) for the Attorney-General; Thomas Field-Fisher QC and Janice Brennan (Ewing Hickman & Clark) for the defendant.
LORD TAYLOR LCJ, giving the court's judgment, said that the judge's remark should not have been made and was unacceptable. However, the way it was seized upon and extracted out of context by the media was regrettable. The judge's comment that there was no excuse for the defendant and that the girl could not be blamed did not figure in any press reports before the court. The court stressed that it did not assist the administration of justice for a campaign to be mounted on the basis of a phrase reported out of context and used to vilify the judge. The effect of the campaign was that the defendant's family had been forced to move home and had lost jobs. The court had considered all the circumstances. An attempt to have unlawful sexual intercourse with a nine-year-old girl was an extremely serious matter. The two principles that a custodial sentence was appropriate for an offence of unlawful sexual intercourse, or an attempt against a very young girl, and the need for an element of deterrence required that the court should have imposed a custodial sentence. The circumstances did not justify only probation. A custodial sentence of four months imprisonment was imposed.
- 1 Venezuela Expo Tattoo 2015: Extreme body art from 'Vampire Woman' to 109mm earlobes
- 3 Ball pool for adults opens in London
- 4 Amal Clooney gives excellent response to fashion question at European Court of Human Rights
Boris Johnson claims porn-obsessed Islamic jihadists are 'literally w*****s'
Saudi preacher who 'raped and tortured' his five -year-old daughter to death is released after paying 'blood money'
Putin opponent reveals Russian President's daughter's secret identity
Ball pool for adults opens in London
Gay couple buy JebBushForPresident.com web domain, and refuse to sell
9 reasons Greece's experiment with the radical left is doomed to failure
Have we reached 'peak food'? Shortages loom as global production rates slow
Greece elections: Syriza and EU on collision course after election win for left-wing party
British grandmother Lindsay Sandiford faces execution by firing squad in Indonesia
Liberal Democrat minister defends comments suggesting immigration causes pub closures
King Abdullah dead: We can't afford not to hold Saudi Arabia's royals to account
Negotiable: Tradewind Recruitment: SEN Teacher We have a fantastic special n...
Negotiable: Tradewind Recruitment: My client is an 11-18 all ability co-educat...
£100 - £150 per day: Tradewind Recruitment: Year 6 Teacher Birmingham Jan 2015...
£20000 - £35000 per annum: Recruitment Genius: This fast growing reinforcing s...