Law Report: Using reports disclosed in error: Pizzey v Ford Motor Co Ltd - Court of Appeal (Lord Justice Nourse, Lord Justice Stuart-Smith and Lord Justice Mann), 26 February 1993
The Court of Appeal dismissed an appeal by the plaintiff, Albert Pizzey, against the refusal by Judge Goldstein, sitting in Bow County Court on 15 July 1992, to restrain the defendants, Ford Motor Co Ltd, from using at the trial two privileged documents inadvertently disclosed to them by the plaintiff's solicitors pursuant to an order for discovery.
The plaintiff's action was for damages for personal injuries sustained while working for the defendants.
Robert P Glancy (Robin Thompson & Partners, Ilford) for the plaintiff; Alan H Jeffreys (Wyeth & Co, Dartford) for the defendants. (Neither counsel appeared in the county court.)
LORD JUSTICE MANN said the court had power to intervene to protect the mistaken party where, on inspection, the other party realised that they had been permitted to see a document only by reason of an obvious mistake: see Guinness Peat Properties Ltd v Fitzroy Robinson Partnership (1987) 1 WLR 1027 at 1045, per Slade LJ.
But the defendants' solicitor swore in her affidavit that she genuinely believed the reports had been disclosed pursuant to an order for discovery made in the case.
It was of utmost importance that a litigant should be able to rely on the discovery of his adversary. Exceptions to that ability must not extend beyond fraud and mistake.
Cases of mistake were stringently confined to those which were obvious, ie evident to the recipient of the document.
The onus was on the plaintiff to satisfy the court that a solicitor receiving the reports ought to have realised that there had been a mistake. The documents had the appearance of the privilege they actually enjoyed.
But though a hypothetical reasonable solicitor might have been surprised to receive the documents, the court could not be satisfied on the probabilities that they would realise that privilege had not been waived.
LORD JUSTICE NOURSE and LORD JUSTICE STUART- SMITH agreed.
Paul Magrath, Barrister
- 1 The BBC has just done more to eradicate ‘terrorism’ than all our wars since 9/11
- 2 Dog thinks owner is drowning in lake, dives in and tries to pull him out
- 4 Chilling drone footage captures Auschwitz ahead of 70th anniversary of liberation
Auschwitz liberation 70th anniversary: Woman sent to three Nazi death camps describes surviving gas chamber
Saudi preacher who 'raped and tortured' his five -year-old daughter to death is released after paying 'blood money'
Greece elections: Greek PM Alexis Tsipras takes aim at 'neo-liberal' Europe as country gears up for prolonged austerity battle
Pornhub star Mia Khalifa receives death threats after being ranked the site's top adult actress
Prince Philip set to be knighted by Australia: Celebrate by reading his greatest gaffes
'We would evict Queen from Buckingham Palace and allocate her council house,' say Greens
French court convicts three over homophobic tweets, in case hailed as a 'significant victory' by LGBT rights campaigners
Greece elections: Syriza and EU on collision course after election win for left-wing party
British Muslim school children suffering a backlash of abuse following Paris attacks
Islamic history is full of free thinkers - but recent attempts to suppress critical thought are verging on the absurd
30,000 reasons why the rhetoric on immigrants claiming benefits can stop now
£27300 per annum: Recruitment Genius: This is an opportunity to join a leading...
£22000 - £26000 per annum: Recruitment Genius: One of the UK's leading boiler ...
Negotiable: Recruitment Genius: This is an exciting opportunity to join an awa...
£38000 - £42000 per annum: Recruitment Genius: One of the UK's best performing...