Merit pay schemes 'favour men'
It accuses employers and union officials of 'an astonishing degree of ignorance, complacency and prejudice on the subject of women's pay and employment'.
Companies often use merit pay to bring rates in line with the market, according to Pay and Gender in Britain 2, prepared by the research organisation Industrial Relations Services. It says that even the most 'objective' systems of merit pay and appraisal are likely to apply more readily to jobs performed by men. The study found that performance assessments of women's occupations often focus on attitudes and behavioural characteristics and casual judgements by line managers.
'Male' jobs are also more likely to receive market supplements than 'female' occupations and a lower ceiling may be applied when the payments are made to women. Employers fail to monitor the 'gender impact' of their flexible systems of pay. Where monitoring has been introduced it has been because of union pressure.
Some personnel specialists admitted they could be doing more to rectify inequalities they knew about, but were not under pressure to do so. There was also a reluctance to investigate pay and gender issues in case the repercussions proved costly for their organisation. Although a few unions were pursuing pay equality issues by supporting cases to industrial tribunals or responding to the implications of legal decisions, most were unable or unwilling to act.
The European Court of Justice yesterday dismissed an attempt by the Equal Opportunities Commission to have the discriminatory treatment of men and women in Britain's state pension scheme declared illegal, writes Tim Jackson.
British law requires men to work for five years longer than women before they receive a pension, and requires working men between 60 and 65 to continue paying pension contributions even though working women of the same age need not.
Yesterday's case hung on the meaning of a directive agreed by the EC states in 1987. This outlawed sex discrimination in national pension systems in principle, but allowed discrimination to continue in practice to avoid disrupting the schemes' financial equilibrium.
Pay and Gender in Britain 2, available from IRS, 18-20 Highbury Place, London N5 1QP.
Commentary, page 23
- 1 Woman and two children killed by mob in riots over 'blasphemous' Facebook post in Pakistan
- 2 Christians: The world's most persecuted people
- 3 The secret report that helps Israelis to hide facts
- 4 Danish TV reporter is all business up top, all party down below
- 5 Denmark bans kosher and halal slaughter as minister says ‘animal rights come before religion’
Woman and two children killed by mob in riots over 'blasphemous' Facebook post in Pakistan
Israel-Gaza conflict: The children were playing in the street with toy guns. The missiles were tragically real
Danish TV reporter is all business up top, all party down below
Syria conflict: Syrian and Turkish Kurds unite to battle Isis threat - ‘We shoot them like sheep, but next day double the number return’
Ross Burden dead: MasterChef and Ready Steady Cook star, dies aged 45
The secret report that helps Israelis to hide facts
A day in the life of Vladimir Putin: The dictator in his labyrinth
A new Russian revolution: The cracks are starting to appear in Putin’s Kremlin power bloc
Were 'Poor Doors' added to mixed developments so wealthy residents don't have to go in alongside social housing tenants?
Arizona execution lasts two hours as killer Joseph Wood left 'snorting and gasping' for air
Opponents of Israel's military operation in Gaza are the real enemies of Middle Eastern peace
£90000 - £120000 per annum: Charter Selection: Jarden Consumer Solutions, a le...
£450 - £500 per day + competitive: Progressive Recruitment: The opportunity:Ec...
£52000 - £58000 per annum + benefits, company car: Ashdown Group: Advertising ...
£21804 - £31868 per annum: Randstad Education Chelmsford: Are you a qualified ...