Blair 'one of two ministers who knew of cash-for-honours'
Friday 10 November 2006
Latest in UK Politics
On Facebook
From the blogs
More than half of Afghanistan’s families live in extreme poverty
Leila is watching her baby intently, as his mouth moves trying to swallow the small blob of yellow p...
Time for a new approach to alcohol
Ambulances were called and three drunk teenagers were brought to my care. One was so drunk we had to...
Bahrain: One year on
I am used to endless lies and criticism from the BNP and its favourite blogster, as well as Islamist...
Paul Volcker stands tall against the banking lobby
Why is Europe, which likes to present itself as an opponent of speculative "Anglo-Saxon" finance, li...
Tony Blair is one of only two cabinet ministers who knew the party agreed to accept secret loans from rich supporters, Scotland Yard's "cash for honours" inquiry is to be told.
The only other minister who knew was Ian McCartney, the former Labour chairman, who gave "party authority" to the system of loans but strongly denies knowing who made them.
There is growing alarm in Labour circles that Mr Blair could become the main focus of the Metropolitan Police inquiry, amid speculation that a Downing Street staff member is proving "extremely helpful" to the investigation.
Mr McCartney, now the Minister for Trade, signed certificates when four businessmen who had provided loans were nominated for peerages, saying they had not donated money to the party. He is adamant that this was not a misleading statement because he did not know they were lenders at the time.
The latest twist in the Metropolitan Police inquiry could leave Mr Blair dangerously isolated. Some Labour insiders believe the Prime Minister may have been the only politician to know that the four businessmen had a financial relationship with Labour when he nominated them for seat in the House of Lords.
The police have written to all ministers in the Cabinet at the time of last year's general election apart from Mr Blair, who is expected to be interviewed by detectives shortly. The other ministers, including Gordon Brown, the Chancellor and Mr Blair's likely successor, and John Prescott, are likely to tell Scotland Yard they did not know about the loans.
Mr McCartney has already been questioned, and is believed to have told police he was unaware the four businessmen had lent money to the party when he signed their nomination forms from a hospital bed while waiting for emergency heart surgery last year.
Alan Milburn, who headed Labour's election effort, has said he was told during the campaign the party had taken out "a lot" of loans.
A source with knowledge of the police inquiry said: "Only two ministers knew when a system of secret loans was set up. One was Ian McCartney, who gave the party's authority for it. The other was Tony Blair."
The Prime Minister has said he takes "full responsibility" for Labour's decisions but insisted that he did not nominate the four men for peerages in return for their loans.
Blair allies are worried that there is a "media agenda" to goad the police into interviewing the Prime Minister. If he is interviewed, he is reported to want the session to take place away from Downing Street to avoid humiliating television pictures of the police entering No 10. It could be held in his Commons room or at his Chequers country residence.
Alan Johnson, the Secretary of State for Education, admitted yesterday that the investigation was damaging Labour. He told journalists at Westminster: "Is it doing us damage? Of course. You do not want to see this kind of thing being written up. There is absolutely no one in the party who would not prefer this was not happening.
"I don't think there is anything at the core of this. We will wait for the end of the police investigation. I have have had my letter and sent my reply. We will have to live with it until we get to the end of the road, which I hope will be soon."
He insisted that philanthopists donating money to the Government's flagship city academies scheme were not seeking honours in return. He said: "The individuals I have seen, most want to be anonymous. They generally come from a poor background and have managed to make something of their lives. The thought they are doing it for a peerage does not ring true. they are doing this for the best of reasons."
- 1 No secularism please, we're British
- 2 Apple admits it has a human rights problem
- 3 'Drunk tanks' and minimum prices to help Britain sober up
- 4 Working as a jail torturer ruined my life
- 5 Lightning kills an entire football team
- 6 Reinstate Knox's murder charge, Italian court told
- 7 Caught in his own blast: an Iranian targeting Israel
- 1 Spotify: 1 million plays, £108 return
- 2 How Koscielny became prince of the Emirates
- 3 Apple admits it has a human rights problem
- 4 Mark Steel: If religion is 'marginal', I'm the Pope
- 5 No secularism please, we're British
- 6 Lightning kills an entire football team
- 7 Matthew Norman: There's always the Human Rights Act, Trevor
- 8 Special report: The hungry generation
- 9 I was born to be a killer. Every night I see the Devil in my dreams
- 10 Six Grammys, five years off: Adele puts love before career
Free trial of new Independent iPad app
Get your daily dose of the best of British journalism, sponsored by American Airlines
Win a three-week coastal jaunt
Spend three weeks exploring every nook and cranny of gorgeous Atlantic Canada.
Amazing restaurant offers
Three glasses of free champagne and a special menu at 46 top London restaurants.
Latest Independent competitions
Win anything from gadgets to five-star holidays on our competitions and offers page.
Commercial thought leaders
Watch the best in the business world give their insights into the world of business.
Career Services
Day In a Page
No secularism please, we're British




Comments