Brown considers fixed term for PMs
Friday 12 October 2007
Latest in UK Politics
On Facebook
From the blogs
More than half of Afghanistan’s families live in extreme poverty
Leila is watching her baby intently, as his mouth moves trying to swallow the small blob of yellow p...
Time for a new approach to alcohol
Ambulances were called and three drunk teenagers were brought to my care. One was so drunk we had to...
Bahrain: One year on
I am used to endless lies and criticism from the BNP and its favourite blogster, as well as Islamist...
Paul Volcker stands tall against the banking lobby
Why is Europe, which likes to present itself as an opponent of speculative "Anglo-Saxon" finance, li...
The decision over when to hold a general election will be transferred from the hands of the Prime Minister to Parliament, under reforms being considered by Gordon Brown that could include "fixed term" governments, according to Harriet Harman, Labour's deputy leader.
Such a move was floated by the Prime Minister in the summer as part of a package of proposed constitutional changes but was firmly renewed during a televised discussion last night in the wake of the row over whether Mr Brown should have called a "snap" poll this autumn, which Ms Harman said had "thrown a spotlight on something that needs to change".
"People do feel unhappy," she told BBC1's Question Time. "[It is] not right the way that the Prime Minister can choose and swish up to Buckingham Palace and get the Queen to decide on a general election." In what appeared to be a pre-prepared attempt to regain the initiative after the row over election timing, Ms Harman said: "It's right that we should look at whether Parliament should decide on whether an election is called and that Parliament should decide... So I think we should change the way we do that."
Asked by David Dimbleby if Ms Harman had raised the matter with Mr Brown, she said: "Yes I have, and the House of Commons is going to consider whether [to] take over that right."
Ms Harman also indicated fixed term parliaments – where election dates are set in advance for every four years, as in the US – were also under consideration. "I can see the attraction in fixed-term parliaments, but I think you have to have some flexibility," she said.
Under the current arrangement, the Prime Minister can choose when to go to the country.
- 1 No secularism please, we're British
- 2 Apple admits it has a human rights problem
- 3 'Drunk tanks' and minimum prices to help Britain sober up
- 4 Working as a jail torturer ruined my life
- 5 Lightning kills an entire football team
- 6 Reinstate Knox's murder charge, Italian court told
- 7 Caught in his own blast: an Iranian targeting Israel
- 1 Spotify: 1 million plays, £108 return
- 2 How Koscielny became prince of the Emirates
- 3 Apple admits it has a human rights problem
- 4 Mark Steel: If religion is 'marginal', I'm the Pope
- 5 No secularism please, we're British
- 6 Lightning kills an entire football team
- 7 Matthew Norman: There's always the Human Rights Act, Trevor
- 8 Special report: The hungry generation
- 9 I was born to be a killer. Every night I see the Devil in my dreams
- 10 Six Grammys, five years off: Adele puts love before career
Free trial of new Independent iPad app
Get your daily dose of the best of British journalism, sponsored by American Airlines
Win a three-week coastal jaunt
Spend three weeks exploring every nook and cranny of gorgeous Atlantic Canada.
Amazing restaurant offers
Three glasses of free champagne and a special menu at 46 top London restaurants.
Latest Independent competitions
Win anything from gadgets to five-star holidays on our competitions and offers page.
Commercial thought leaders
Watch the best in the business world give their insights into the world of business.
Career Services
Day In a Page
No secularism please, we're British




Comments